I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

    • @pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I prefer DDG, but I hate the news search. 90% of the results are paywalled.

      Oh, and sometimes the image search will return a pile of porn for a seemingly clean search request. I once searched for “R34 Skyline” expecting Nissans, and got VERY different results without safe search.

      • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        is it? that kind of makes sense, because I still use Bing occasionally while Google is completely out of rotation, although I don’t find Bing as good as duckduckgo.

        edit: it is not! looks like the DuckDuckGo search engine is an aggregate of hundreds of search engines, including their own duck duck bot, excluding Google but including some Bing results.

        • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          77 months ago

          Their FAQ hems and haws about that, but (in the past) I’ve done side-by-side tests and found identical results. Maybe something’s changed, maybe it hasn’t.

          • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            it must have done by now, then, I get different results from identical prompts in DuckDuckGo and Bing although both are usually relevant.

            “DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.”

            are you having trouble finding something specifically or you just don’t like the quality of the search results you’re finding in general?

            definitely if you’re still on Google, stop using it.

            It’s completely useless at this point.

    • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      DDG often gives me results for individual words of the search but not results for all of the words in that order for which to have contextually relevant results.

      I often find myself forced to brave the shitshow that is google search.

      • @pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        that’s weird. the search results should still prioritize your search as is over variations, but not limit it. do you try searching in quotations to force the specific search exactly?

      • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        have you tried the duck assist thing yet?

        If you’re trying to talk to the search engine more like a chat assistant, that sort of response might be what you’re looking for.

        • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Fuck Duck Assist all my homies hate Duck Assist and I keep having to turn it back off again.

          Whoever made it should get cancer and not have their children show up or call them back.

          • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            haha, whaaat why?

            I just saw it for the first time today, it seems to mostly quote incredible sources rather than amalgamating responses.

            you got some issues huh, poor fella?

            • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -17 months ago

              I’m sorry I hurt your feelings and made you want to defend an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets, but maybe you should go eat some ass?

              • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                “I’m sorry I hurt your feelings”

                I feel only pity for you.

                reading your comments is like watching a diseased guinea pig nibble on its own scabs.

                “an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets”

                duckduckgo’s llm tool offers relevant information from credible sources.

                that is good.

                Good luck unbunching those panties.

  • @Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    977 months ago

    It’s not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

    Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every “product” they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It’s not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

  • FauxPseudo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that’s just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

      • FauxPseudo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        I have it a test with some operators from the search bar instead of using the form and it did exactly what it was supposed to. I’ll keep this on hand. Thank you.

        • Mojeek Search Engine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          let us know if you find anything which could be better also, we’re always looking for ways to improve

  • @raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    357 months ago

    The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there’s not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

  • @bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    317 months ago

    It’s not just you. At some point, search’s primary purpose went from “finding the information you’re looking for” to “getting paid to put links in front of you”. Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

  • @anttifantti@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    307 months ago

    I feel like it’s especially bad if you are searching for anything related to a marketable product. I tried searching ddg for information about using a surge protector with halogen bulbs and all I got was pages and pages of listicles on “best halogen lights 2024” full of affiliate links.

    • @bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 months ago

      And the AI is trained on the shitty search results. It just parses them many times faster than a human reader can, which does at least make it better at getting to the fucking point. Once paid advertising is fully integrated with LLM, it will be as shitty and useless as traditional search. And then the entire world will collectively hop to the next trend so it can get hyper-monetized/enshittified, too.

  • @DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

    Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

    • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 months ago

      Huh…Can’t replicate that claim (though I would believe it happening)

      On the 20th Sep. I asked my Google Home if it would be raining.
      It responded that it would rain. I asked when it would rain.
      Home responded with “Today it won’t rain.”

      Like what? 5 seconds ago you said it would. No weather report reports rain. Where did you get the first response from??
      And I could even replicate it (have it on video)

      • @DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I can’t get it to repeat it either but it was definitely an ai auto response thing from google ai overview or whatever it’s called

        Now it’s giving distance from burner and everything lol. It’s learning 👀

  • lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    167 months ago

    they overengineered it. they now give you results they think most people want instead of what you searched. for google, it helps to switch on verbatim mode and set your country to something weird like Azerbaijan

      • lurch (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        under the google search field is a row of buttons. one of them, usually far right, is “search tools”. sometimes you have to scroll the button row to reach it. it has a verbatim switch that makes google not replace your search terms with what it thinks most people mean when entering that

        • lurch (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          under the google search field is a row of buttons. one of them, usually far right, is “search tools”. sometimes you have to scroll the button row to reach it. it has a verbatim switch that makes google not replace your search terms with what it thinks most people mean when entering that

  • @VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    137 months ago

    Whats funny and kind of sad, is that they know exactly what you’re searching for, and don’t give any fucks about showing you that, and instead will show you this cool other thing that they’re getting their beak wet on thats like, eh… kinda related to what you typed in. Google didn’t get dumber, they just don’t have any meaningful competition which would force them to deliver high quality results, and instead of enshittified their results to the point where they’re practically useless.