• KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    359 months ago

    ah finally, i can buy a micro sd card for 500 dollars, the same price as a gazillion terabyte harddrive, and get less reliability out of it.

    • @aesopjah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      yeah, but you can carry it with you at all times if your phone takes an SD card.

      although, can they use one that large, or is there some restriction?

      • @acceptable_humor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        I think most phones have a 1tb cap … But nowadays most phones don’t have SD card slots so I don’t know where that has gone

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        this is true, my phone supports up to 400GB but it’s a bit older. Anything over about 512GB and you’re gonna run into issues writing and reading data reliably/fast enough. I’ve yet to find a way to transfer more than like 5Gb of files reliably to my android lmao.

        It’s just a shit platform with shit software implementations, there’s not really much you can do about it.

  • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    349 months ago

    All I want is higher resiliency SD cards. It must be a technology limitation with being unable to fit a good controller in there or something because I would gladly sacrifice speed and capacity for something reliable in a lot of my applications.

    • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      What SD cards are you buying, and where are you using them?

      I’ve been using a 256gb Sandisk high endurance SD card in my dashcam since 2021 (when I lost the first 2 I’d bought in 2018) and it’s still perfectly content writing a 4k + 1080p video for about 16 hours straight every single day. It wasn’t until last year I got a 512gb Samsung Pro Plus drive to split the load/act as a backup.

  • @OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    339 months ago

    I paid $100 for a massive 1TB hard drive when they first came out years ago. Thought a TB was essentially unlimited and wasn’t sure if it could ever be used.

    What a crazy advancement to get to 8TB the size of your pinky nail.

    • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      1TB may have seemed unlimited back then, but now with 8TB, if an uncompressed Blu-Ray is around 50GB, that can fit 160 Blu-Ray movies. Now, 160 movies may seem like a lot, and it is, but think of how many movies there have been overall over time. Then, consider that we’re only talking about movies and then there are other things like TV shows, music, games, etc.

      You can never have enough storage.

    • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Our first family PC had a 1,3 gigabyte drive. That had Win ‘95 on it, productivity apps, bunch of games, etc. This was a time when you could actually still run games off CD-ROM’s without needing installs.

      These days, my phone has over 200 times the memory. It’s still amazing to me.

      Same thing with SD cards. When I started with digital photography, a 32 MB card was big. My current camera takes images that are too large to fit on it! Early cameras even had floppy disk storage, if you can imagine…

      • @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        I think our first family PC had 40MB of storage, and we loaded optical discs into a caddy before inserting them. That was in the late 80s.

        • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          It gets even wilder when you tell younger people that PC’s didn’t even come with storage drives in the early days. One of the earliest I used had to have software loaded through cassette tape. That was certainly a bit annoying, as it took quite a while and was error prone.

          These days I somewhat collect old hardware. I love things like my Macintosh Plus where you need to juggle disks in order to load software in the memory so you can use it. Nowadays a single text e-mail outweighs the entire OS for a system like that.

    • @PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19 months ago

      You’re only getting 4 TB the size of your pinky nail. 8TB is the size of your thumbnail. Most people can’t be arsed to read the article, but you couldn’t even read the headline?

  • @Visstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I am slightly confused why they use UHS-I instead of UHS-II (or even UHS-III) for such a big capacity. Seems like people needing so much capacity probably write a lot of data in a short time. UHS-II is 3 times quicker.

    Then again maybe they are aiming for devices that can’t even run UHS-II

  • @SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    and both are described as SDUC UHS-I cards that are “built for tomorrow’s smartphones, gaming devices, drones, cameras, and laptops.”

    Gaming devices: ✅️
    Drones: ✅️
    Cameras: ✅️
    Smartphones: ❌️

    Basically every current flagship phone, and you know that’s what they mean, has done away with expandable memory…

    • WIZARD POPE💫
      link
      fedilink
      English
      239 months ago

      Which is utter bullshit. Especially since a lot of lower end phones have the option for dual sim or one sim and sd. There is literally no reason for flagships to not have that and make file transfering easier.

      • @SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        Or a headphone jack, yes, a large number of people have wireless earbuds…but the audio quality off them isn’t amazing, and goddammit I wanna plug my really nice headphones in, or connect to a stereo without needing to use a Bluetooth dongle or…or…fuck…idk…just stupid. The big players saw apple cutting all that away(barring expandable memory, they never had that as far as I know) and said fuck what people want, apple can dictate what their customers want, and we want to too! And then getting a device with enough on-board storage is hundreds of extra capitalism tokens. It’s a fuckin mess…

        • WIZARD POPE💫
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          It’s sad that because most people dont care about these things we dont get to enjoy them either.

      • @Godnroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        But then how will they upcharge you for additional storage or push you to their monthly cloud storage solution?

    • @Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      I still have an S9 with notification LED and expandable storage. I recently upgraded the SD card to 512gb.

      I live in fear of this phone dying, and me having to get something disappointing to replace it.

      • @SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        performs secret S9 handshake

        Mine’s in a drawer with the battery removed. If I need a backup phone it’s always there. I upgraded about a year and a half ago to the S20FE as it was the most recent with expandable memory. I don’t hate it, but it’s certainly no where near as good for it’s time as the S9 was. My major gripe? The ringtone is so quiet that I often can’t hear it from my pocket in a silent room. Which is absolutely ridiculous as the speaker’s decently loud. The only way to make notification volume louder is to put a custom ROM on it. I’m perfectly happy to do that, just need to hold off until November when warranty ends, just in case something happens that isn’t my fault.

        Edit: goddamn I miss the notification LED…

    • @jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Honestly, you can’t really compare the modern phone memory vs sd card memory anymore.

      For pure storage ya, it doesn’t really matter. For using it for anything more than that, it’s honestly too slow.

      UFS 4.0 Sequential Read Speed: Up to 4,200 MB/s Sequential Write Speed: Up to 2,800 MB/s Latency: Very low, making it ideal for high-speed data transfer and multitasking in mobile devices. Usage: Commonly used in high-end smartphones, tablets, and other mobile devices where speed and efficiency are critical.

      SDUC UHS-I Sequential Read Speed: Up to 104 MB/s Sequential Write Speed: Typically around 70-90 MB/s, though the maximum theoretical speed can go up to 104 MB/s. Latency: Higher compared to UFS 4.0, which can impact performance in tasks requiring quick access to data. Usage: Used primarily in SD cards, which are common in cameras, drones, and other devices requiring expandable storage.

      • @SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        Sure, on-board is stupid fast. I don’t need stupid fast to hold my photos and videos for work, or my 100+gb of music for on the go that I change up semi-regularly. What I use my sd for is pure storage, and I now don’t want to further upgrade to a new phone as I either have to pay through the nose for storage, or sacrifice some device power and build quality to be able to have expandable memory. You cannot with a straight face tell me phones don’t need expandable memory, because they really do. I can’t even count how many time my wife has had poor/no reception and was trying to show me a photo from years ago, but her iPhone couldn’t grab a high quality image from the cloud. On a road trip, her Spotify sometimes doesn’t work due to no signal/roaming. I currently don’t have that problem. Most of the music I am listening to frequently is on my sd card, I have backups of ROMs for if I wanna play an SNES or DS game or whatever, I have the important photos from the last decade. It’s all just there because I can slap a 512gb sd into my phone.

        • @jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          I’m def not defending the big phone companies. There could be creative ways to mitigate pure storage vs fast storage, similarly to computer DRAM vs NVME 4.0.

          I think another point I want to add is that you’re an outlier. Out of all my friends with iPhones and Android phones, they are not ripping roms and downloading their music from CDs.

          Normies are kinda dumb and don’t fully utilize their phones.

          These phones are geared towards those normies. Modern phone makers don’t consider you as part of their demographic.

  • dindonmasker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 months ago

    This is the kind of discussion i’m here for. Thanks everyone! I didn’t know SD and micro SD cards where this unreliable but i always use them for short term stuff or content that is backed up somewhere else so i think i’m good.

    • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They aren’t that unreliable FWIW. Obviously, it should not be your only copy of media, but I have microSD cards that are still readable with data intact even 10, 11, or more years later.

      If you buy quality microSD cards, expect them to last a long time.

      • JustARegularNerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 months ago

        I feel it’s worth mentioning the application of them also factors into their longevity.

        Good quality SD card holding some documents and random files? Yeah probably 10+ years. Good quality SD card being used in a dashcam, constant writes? I’m replacing my good SD card after about ~2 years of service because its showing signs of failure.

  • @RockyC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    I feel like this is a product looking for a market. Why would anyone ever trust that much data to something so fragile and easy to lose?

    • @recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      I use a 2tb (iirc) in my steam deck. Perfect application for that… Low rewrites, but totally expendable/replaceable data.

    • @TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      4k Drones, upgradeable phones, DLSR cameras, Data per weight etc.

      I own a 1tb ssd for my Steam Deck, literally 0 complaints, runs real fast, can’t feel any heat, never need to take it out other than if I’m factory resetting, it’s perfect! (though Valves next deck should just have a bigger ssd slot)

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They’re not for long term storage, they’re for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        if you want long term CCTV setup properly you should be using ethernet connected security cameras and then transmitting it back to a central server with a hdd always recording. It’s much more reliable and way more cost effective, just requires you running an ethernet cable to where the camera is.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            with ethernet the live feed is perfectly fine, and there is no remote downloading, it’s all streamed over the ethernet to a central box which handles everything from there. You might need some decode/encode capabilities, but to my understanding a lot of cameras will run multiple hardware encodes straight from the sensor over to the network already. So you probably don’t need much.

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 months ago

                personally i don’t have a cctv setup at the moment, so i can’t give any recommendations, but you’d be looking for POE capable cameras, and you’d need a POE enabled switch, and a computer connected to that switch in order to handle the incoming data, including software obviously. But it’s probably also dependent on the camera itself, nicer cameras are probably going to be more flexible.

                there are plenty of decent videos about homelab based CCTV setups out there if you’re looking to dig into them a bit more.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            yeah and at that point you’re probably not using a microsd card i would figure. You have a small computer in there already, might as well throw in an SSD or something.

            I guess if you needed the sheer capacity of 4TB you might use a micro sd, but you’re probably gambling more than you’re saving at that point.

    • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      I’d love them for my dash cam if they were affordable. My camera records in front and behind of my van in 4k, so that’s 90-100 gigs an hour. I leave it running as a surveillance camera when I’m parked, so just going to work and back in one day would use over a terabyte.

      • @RockyC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        Why would you continuously record? Just record motion events and you won’t need a card that large at all, plus it will last a lot longer.

  • @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    The mockup image is kinda misleading (article admits its crappy lol).

    afaik there aren’t any current microSD cards 1TB+ that have a u3 or even u1 speed because the increase in storage size comes at the cost of speed.

    The development is definitely cool, but the physical size of a microSD is probably very challenging to design around without sacrificing something.

  • @Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Wasn’t sandisk particularly unreliable or am I mistaken with the brand? I remember some problem with SDs failing prematurely

  • @Eiri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Huh. I can see drones, action cameras and spy cameras being able to store lots of super high quality footage with this. Like, so much footage it lasts longer than the battery.

    It’s niche, but I can see the use case.

  • @Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -19 months ago

    What would anybody even use 4 TB SD card for? Storing a shit-ton of pirated movies that you can watch on your phone? Aside from that I have no idea. 256 gigs is probably more than enough for anything a normal user would do on a phone.

    • @Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      pirated

      It’s not pirating if you own a physical copy like DVD or Blu-ray, it’s fair use. Fuck the studios for trying to take that away from us.

    • Rocket
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      Portable gaming Pcs. I would love to have my entire library of games accessible offline. My emulation folder alone is like 500gb. I also wouldnt call myself a normal user though. These definitely have a niche market and probably a price tag just as niche.

    • @kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      File size is a major limiting factor in high speed video and to a lesser extent convenient ultra HD digital film. At 3840x2160 (basic 4k) uncompressed 10-bit video 1 frame is about 250 MB. An hour of footage at 30 fps then is about half a terabyte. At “only” 1000 fps you would burn through an 8 TB SD card in… 32 seconds.

      • @tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        You’d need some way to cache that video, though, because it’d take 24 hours to write 8TB at SD card speeds of 80 MB/s.