Also I want to hear from you, is it ethical and why?

  • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1169 months ago

    I mean you have to buy it on your own accord, culture your own cells, and then successfully cook and eat them. As long as you aren’t stealing other people’s cells to eat them without their consent it seems more ethical than the current meat industry.

      • @x4740N@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        3D printed cell scaffolds combined with this mean you can shape them

        Now I wonder if someone has actually tried making a dildo from cultured flesh and skin

    • @Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      219 months ago

      But it’s still cannibalism, yeah? If someone consented to be eaten before they died or even wished for it, would you be OK with eating them?

      • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We have to draw some sort of line here though. Will this give you prions? Does this end the person’s life like traditional cannibalism usually does? Theres a lot to unpack in these tiny man steaks. I’d still rather people be growing their own meat at home in a petri dish than having animals locked in cages for eternity.

      • @garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This is unironically one of my favourite questions to ask new friends. I’ve gotten a variety of answers, but my own response has always been yes, if the person was healthy and had clearly consented.

        In my opinion, cannibalism is bad for two main reasons, 1) it can be unsafe if the person was ill, the meat has spoiled, or if it’s done too often (this has been studied in cannibalistic rituals) and 2) it’s unethical if the person doesn’t consent to it.

        Eating animal meat is non consensual and there can be diseases in there too - many people have died from it. Just because it’s more socially acceptable, I don’t really see it as an ethically better decision.

        I would 100% at least try my own home grown meat cells.

        • @Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          Damn, I love your response, even though I don’t know of I agree! Are you Vegan?

          I personally see it as No, because I see us humans as special. Speaking as an atheist, end of day, we are special as humans.

          I eat meat, I try to limit it to the ethically harvested. Hunted, family farm grown, it even tastes the best, any concerns aside. But eating a person is WRONG, consent or no.

          • @Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            It’s interesting that you ask if they are vegan, as if understanding the ethical problems of eating meat would only be valid if you are also strictly vegan.

            You evidently understand it is not completely ethically correct to eat animals in all circumstances, as you say you only eat ethically harvested meat. But you also say you believe humans to be special as a reason to eat animals, so why not eat all animals under all circumstances?

            The main point though, why would it still be wrong to eat human meat if lab grown and consensual?

          • @garbagebagel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            I’m not vegan or vegetarian anymore because I have a lot of allergies that prevent me from eating plant based anything. But I also try to limit it to locally and ethically harvested when I do eat meat.

            I identify as agnostic and definitely don’t believe that any one living being is better or more special than the others (except maybe cats).

      • @Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So, if it were the original cells, then it would be autocannibalism, since these are cloned cells (from what I gather) it’s technically not the same thing. [Edit: Personally, it’s a bit of a tossup in my mind. I don’t think it’s unethical, but it’s still a weird thing]

    • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      As long as you aren’t stealing other people’s cells to eat them without their consent it seems more ethical than the current meat industry.

      Even if you did, while super weird as long as you didn’t get the cells through violence it’s probably still more ethical than the meat industry.

  • @edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    539 months ago

    without causing harm to animals

    • Humans are animals
    • Growing me-steak and eating it causes psychic damage
    • Therefore, an animal was harmed
    • @Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      309 months ago

      If we cultured cells from someone with an autocannibalism fetish, would it then be OK?

      Like I take 1d4 psychic damage whenever I see furries at cons, but I don’t think they should have to be banned

    • Ziglin (it/they)
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      I don’t think you can generalize that. I’d love to have little me-steaks and I’d even share them with friends, especially if they can be a Möbius strip.

      As long as the human chooses to grow their me-steaks themselves I see no issue.

    • @Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      nonconsensual meat grown from samples illicitly taken against someone’s will.

      Meat is already produced without consent and much more violently then taking samples.

  • @Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    409 months ago

    Haha I’ve been saying for fucking years that boutique lab growing meat outlets will pop up selling exotic animal meats and celebrity human meat. We are getting close to that future

  • @Soulg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    409 months ago

    Of course it’s ethical, unless I’m seriously misunderstanding something you literally have to make the decision to buy it and then partake in it.

    I guess you can use it unethically but by default intended usage it’s fine

  • @LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    389 months ago

    I would be worried about disease first, but if it’s your own cells maybe there’s less chance? Prions are terrifying

    My second question would be taste

    If there’s no disease and it tastes good then fuck yeah all in

    • @areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      Unless you already have prions from CJD you can’t catch Kuru by eating yourself. You have to actually eat someone who already has prions to catch it. Even then you have to eat nervous system tissue to be at a significant risk.

  • @JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    369 months ago

    I bet I taste delicious!

    This is ethical despite it walking the line of taboo. It hurts no one, and if the tissue sample can be extracted at home without causing damage to the donor I see no issue with it.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s unethical because you can’t safely perform muscle biopsies at home, thus it is a violation of the duty of care, and culturing stratified squamous epithelium and calling it meat(and steak no less) is lying without any benefit to others, which is a fundamental ethical violation.

  • @x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    269 months ago

    Don’t you get prions from canibalism

    Also if this costs less than supermarket meat I could buy some beef and clone it

    • @areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      299 months ago

      Yes and no. You get prions from eating a person that’s also infected with prions. Basically if you eat cloned meat of yourself it should be fine as you either already have prions, or you don’t already have prions. Prions manifest as either CJD if you got it naturally or Kuru if you got it through canibalism.

  • @devAlot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    229 months ago

    fetal bovine serum (FBS)… is derived from the blood of calf fetuses after their pregnant mothers are slaughtered by the meat or dairy industry.

    I did not know this… and after reading the wiki, I found it rather disturbing…

    The first stage of the production process for FBS is the harvesting of blood from the bovine fetus after the fetus is removed from the slaughtered cow. The fetus dies from the lack of oxygen by remaining in the protective environment of the uterus for a minimum of 15–20 minutes after the cow is dead

    • ✺roguetrick✺
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The whole point of this art project is to suggest that using expired human blood serum is acceptable for growing lab meat btw. That’s what they used to culture the cheek cells. Took them several months to grow that amount though and cheek cells have very different requirements to muscle cells, so I dunno why they were presenting it as an option. Guess that’s why it was an art project and not a presentation at a conference.

    • @rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      Well it’s not actually available yet (and perhaps won’t ever be), so it’s more cantibalism.

    • @Sunrosa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t think the people that came up with the word for cannibalism ever imagined it could come from a petri dish. I’d say it’s undefined as or as not cannibalism