• @MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    681 year ago

    I’m no fucking predator or pedophile

    Well… If the person was a minor, and you weren’t, and you knew they were young and the messages were ‘leaning inappropriate’, you’re a pedophile.

    Also a predator.

    • @weastie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I hate to get so semantical but using the word pedophile incorrectly just desensitizes the word. Pedophilia means being attracted to children, primarily meaning before or in the early stages of puberty, usually younger than 13. In fact, many pedophiles would not be attracted to someone aged 15+ because they are typically exclusively or primarily interested in prepubescent bodies.

      That doesn’t mean this guy isn’t a total asshole, but he’s not a pedophile, and I think anyone can understand an adult sexting an older teen, while still absolutely horrid, is quite different from sexting a child.

      Once again, absolutely not defending this guy, I don’t even know who he is… but I think it’s important not to desensitize the word.

      • @MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        I know the distinction, but hebephile doesn’t carry the same weight. Also, I believe I read the minor was 12. So… Pedo.

        I stand by what I said. We don’t need to be apologistic towards the scum of the earth. Kids are kids.

        • Asherah
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          Oh fuck. I heard she was 17 and that was fucking bad enough as is. Fucking hell this man is awful.

      • Christian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        Yeah I would totally agree with this if the word wasn’t already desensitized a very long time ago. The language has changed. (I’m assuming people were ever differentiating, I don’t really know/remember the history.) Colloquially it means interested in teens unless it’s clarified to be worse than that.

        I recommend not trying to make this argument, anywhere. It will not change the way people use words, even if it could there would not be a point (attraction to pre-teens is so egregious that it will always be clarified), and a lot of people will assume that someone who doesn’t accept the colloquial usage is themselves interested in teens and in denial about how the public actually views that to the point where they think only interest in prepubescent children is problematic and handwave everything else away as a language issue.

        • @MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Colloquially, it’s a catch-all nowadays. Like I said in another reply, we don’t need to differentiate between lowest common denominators. That gets into sounding sympathetic to these fucks, and anyone who sympathizes might as well be one themselves.

      • @skittlebrau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I’ve attended a seminar for child protection before that was delivered by a former cop (that worked in the sex crimes division) and they said the exact same thing - in the context of correctly making the distinction between paedophile and sex offender.

        Sounds like he was grooming her.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    3811 months ago

    wop wop wop wop wop

    I have this feeling this is probably not the last controversy involving minors we will see shake out of his mustache this week. Justin Roiland had his empire also collapse from grooming. Guy is done.

    • @BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      That’s why drake is done too? The guy who beat the shit out of a woman and tattooed it on himself? Drake the groomer with his new album? That done?

      • @shapesandstuff@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1911 months ago

        That’s the thing right. Nobody gets “cancelled”
        They get called out and shamed… and then carry on with business a few weeks later.

        Rammstein is filling stadiums again, drd will come back from his vacation and keep on trucking on.

        They never face consequences and yet they cry about a woke cancelculture that only exists in their heads to hype up their own bullshit

        • @Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          Did the allegations against rammstein ever amount to anything? I remember seeing the initial story, but then never any follow up about how the court cases went or whether it turned out to be true or not

          • @shapesandstuff@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Legally, no. But there was zero intention to investigate, or clear up anything from the band. No comments, distancing from such actions.

            They just threw c&ds at the women in question and buried the topic. Ah and made fun of it of course.

  • @Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From the article, it sounds like he knew they were a minor and still leaned into the conversations. Why? Why TF would you even be curious about it?

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    Fine. I won’t pick a side. I won’t crucify anyone without evidence. So…release the transcripts. That seems like the logical step.

    • @Master@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1311 months ago

      Twitch settled with him instead of losing in arbitration for banning him. I want to see the the transcripts. It sounds like part of his settlement was that he couldn’t talk about it but ex twitter employees violated the nda. That’s a lot of work on twitches side to keep it hushed which makes this weirder.

      He’s a massive pos so it Wouldn’t surprise me if he did do something worthy of this witch hint but damnit i want to see the texts before i burn him when twitch is being so weird about it.

      • @saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        That’s a lot of work on twitches side to keep it hushed which makes this weirder.

        I don’t think that’s weird, twitch really doesn’t want the pr of being wrong or having a pedo on their platform, its a lose-lose and I would expect them to try and cover it up regardless.

  • @catalyst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    I keep thinking back to years ago when someone at work tried to tell me this guy was good and I could just tell on vibes alone to stay clear.

  • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    When you act erratic like that, you got caught. If you were innocent of even intention no long winded explanation of “they want me to disappear” would be necessary as the messages wouldnt even exist. The dildo of consequences has arrived for Guy Beahm.

  • @Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Seems like I have to add this moron to the ignore list right next to Musk, so I no longer see posts about him.

  • @pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    I’m shocked that yet another anti-woke pos who gets triggered by pronouns turned out to be a predator. would’ve never guessed!

    • @LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      17 after being groomed for ~3 years when dingus tried to meet up and the parents went loud with twitch. Grooming a 14 year old girl is generally considered in bad taste.

  • @hexadence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -3711 months ago

    Ah, there it is. The sponsored hate train. Like reddit, but cheaper. But hey, thanks for keeping this site running.