• BezzelBob
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children… but how many children have they actually saved from this?

    • @Beaver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      They’re probably gonna put parents behind bars for a misunderstanding on their private lives

      • BezzelBob
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        This reminds me of that time google was scanning photos and reported a man to the police for being a pedophile, turns out it was a father sending a picture to his doctor

    • applepie
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Catholic clergy is sill grifting around this here country…

  • @archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    If consent mattered, governments and corporations all around the world wouldn’t be pushing to expand the global surveillance apparatus.

    Is this just another Tuesday now? Fuck me.

  • @uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    I’d vote for testing this mass chat control on politicians and CEOs of the companies that want this mass control. Let’s say for the next 10 years? Or 20? Pretty sure the results will be great. For people, for justice, for democracy.

  • @barryamelton@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Even if you don’t opt in, 99% of the people you interact with would have opted in. So you will monitored as they please.

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    As if any chat systems inteded for dubious purposes in the darknet would give a flying f-ck about this law.