• @MacGuffin94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1701 year ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone. I want a circa 2014 smart phone that is not expected to replace my laptop and serve as a constant data stream for corporations. I want to be able to visit a website on my phone and not have it try to get me to download an app, be ads on 70% of the screen, or just be unreadable formatting. Let me call, text, do a basic online search, play a stupid flash game, and take my money. Stop being greedy and trying to make everything I do monetizable

    • @randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      There is something about the Palm Pre or Jolla Sailfish OS that was so endearing back then. Devices that support it just don’t exist.

    • @olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Dumb phones don’t help you for tickets, boarding passes, tap to pay, etc. those things require strong security, not the latest tech. I’ve got a few teenage kids and even for them it’s not very practical to exist without a smartphone.

    • @Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I want to be able to pull up an 80% version of a website on my phone, and have a button to open the full website on my computer for when I get home.

        • Resol van Lemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I got it long after the Antennagate problem got fixed. I believe iOS 4.3 was out when I first bought it.

          • TheRealKuni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Was Antennagate fixed? Or did people just learn not to hold it in the wrong place?

            I thought it was about physical placement of the antenna, I’d be surprised if a software update fixed it.

        • Resol van Lemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I wonder why companies can’t just make something as good as these again.

    • 0xED
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This sounds good, but I’m still not downloading Tapatalk…

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People want phones that don’t cost $1000+, lack basic features and constantly prey on their personal data. That’s what they want. Some express that by saying they want “dumb phones”, but the first part is the larger driver here.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      A big part of the markup is simply the proprietary systems that run the phone. Apple’s restrictive OS, combined with the planned obsolescence strategy for older units, corral their customer base into buying newer models every 3-5 years.

      Android’s open system allows for competitor brands to compete alongside the bigger publishers - Samsung and Sony and Lenova and Motorola. But even then, we’ve lost the more modular phone design to a hobbyist-hostile manufacturing strategy that precludes people from swapping out old batteries or doing basic repairs.

      This, combined with data providers that try to bake the price of new phones into the subscription service (AT&T, Verizon, and Tmobile all offering “free” phone upgrades on painfully expensive plans) make the industry this extractive rent-seeking mess.

    • @TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I want those things and I want a phone that’s easy to use, doesn’t constantly advertise to me, and is more of a helpful tool than a distraction.

      • @JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I think that last bit is more of a ‘what you make of it’ situation, regardless of how smart or dumb a phone is.

        Unfortunately the manufacturers want the data and advertising revenue, and they’d only be persuaded to offer an alternative if they made the same amount of money.

        If each sale of a $900 smart phone gives them $100 of ad revenue over a couple years, I’d bet my bottom dollar they would charge $200 for the ‘dumb’ version.

        • @TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I think the distractions are partially a user issue and partially a company issue. Companies make their programs noisy with notifications by default that I only change it once I’ve found it annoying. They also make their program so bloated that they are slow to load and execute. By the time the app loads, I’ve lost my flow and now the tool is a nuisance. My mind is already cluttered. I don’t need tech to slow it down.

          • @JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I see what you mean. People use their devices at different levels. That may not be the best way to put it.

            My meaning is that a portion of the users will be the type to spend a couple hours digging through each setting on a new device to set it to their needs. Another group will use the device with minimal initial adjustments, and tweak things as they find things they don’t like. Then there’s a third group that will almost never open a preferences panel and just use a device by its factory settings, likely to never consider potential improvements to their user experience.

            From what you’ve said, I imagine your in that second group. I myself am in the first one I described; I look at the options of any hardware I purchase or software I download before I actually begin to use it.

            Unfortunately - in the context of this post - the number of people in that third group I imagine outnumber us by multiple orders of magnitude, and therefore companies with shareholders to appease will always manufacture devices with as much bloat and advertising and invasive data mining as they can be paid to put in.

  • 520
    link
    fedilink
    461 year ago

    Uh, they DO still make dumb phones. And people still buy them.

    • Vaggumon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      Yep, 79 year old father in law has a brand new dumb phone with a t-9 keypad, made by TCL. Works perfectly fine.

      • applepie
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Yeah but this type of story doesn’t generate click bait headline.

  • @simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    Step 1: Reformat your Android phone

    Step 2: Turn on ultra power saving mode (this disables everything in the system except a few apps such as phone and messaging)

    Step 3: Never connect to the internet

    Et voila. You have a dumb phone.

    • @danciestlobster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      You can just never connect your TV to the Internet or make it forget all networks, that works pretty well if you have a console or PC hooked into it that is doing the actual content for it

  • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    I don’t think people really want dumbphones, I think they just want apps that better support their self-control. Digital Wellbeing on Android is a start, but it’s way too easy to bypass.

    • @eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I wager some people want “dumbphones”. A phone you open and just dial into without scrolling through apps. A phone with a simple screen that doesn’t just gobble down battery life. So, like, a smartphone could fit this need with the right interfaces available.

      • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I mean, yeah, but that’s a different desire than this article is talking about because they’re more or less talking about flip phones.

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I want people to stop thinking that their little quip to me is of the utmost importance. I want people to wait a few hours to tell me something instead of calling me while I’m driving and act insulted when I tell them to hurry up because I’m either driving or pulled over.

      • @ji17br@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        If you don’t like being disturbed while driving you should use do not disturb while driving.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Ew, people call you? All my friends text, because they know we are busy adults, I’ll get to the chat when I can get to the chat. Little monster stays on vibration only or complete silence until I decide so. I control the damn thing not the other way around. Everybody who knows me or I give my phone number knows that phone call means someone died, there’s blood everywhere, or the building got set on fire. Nothing else requires phone call level urgency.

  • @mister_flibble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Not as far as “dumb” per se but I would accept “less smart” in exchange for physical buttons and a removable battery.

  • billwashere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Dumb phones don’t have all the gooey “track everything we do” goodness in the middle so I doubt it.

      • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly. If dumbphones made a comeback, companies would simply achieve it by presenting the user with a dumb UI while the data harvesting would still go on in the background.

        I guess there’s the valid argument that you’d be doing less on your phone so there’d be less to spy on, but there’d still be spying, and much of it would simply be shifted to the user’s PC instead of a smartphone. Guess what, spying is rife there too.

        The answer to stopping the spying is privacy laws that put people, and their privacy, above tax-dodging multinationals.

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I want a real software dev team for linux phones. I don’t have programming knowledge, but I can pitch in for a reoccurring crowdfund to pay them. The Pinephone is nice hardware, but Pine64 has always said that they’re leaving the software up to the community.

      • @tux7350@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        The name is silly but the Galaxy XCover 6 pro checks all those boxes as a new phone. It even has the old style notification light, different colors for notifications.

  • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone but I would 100% take a phone with a back that isn’t glass, high repairability, and full control over the OS. Make it THICC and put a big battery too.

    • @VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Legit the cheapo plastic screens on the less than $100 phones are the most resilient phones i’ve ever owned

      I had a chunk of metal fall on one, and the only thing it did was INDENT the screen, the plastic was soft enough to bend rather than just crack

        • @Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Yeah that was probably the wrong decision, following their mantra. But personally it doesn’t bother me too much. I’m pretty happy with it

          • @far_university1990@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago
            1. Make repairable phone

            2. Remove headphone jack and release wireless bud that not repairable (TWS earbud)

            3. Piss off community

            4. ???

            5. Profit?

            (i know fairbud now better, but was not back then)

      • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        From what I understand about phone design, it allows for the smallest possible design that can still do NFC and wireless charging, while keeping that premium feel.

        I don’t give a damn about premium feel, I just want a no-nonsense phone that does what it’s fucking supposed to while still being serviceable.

    • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      For now there are Fairphone and SHIFTphone but both only guarantee to work in the EU. They offer very mid hardware but I hear they do actually work.

      • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Not EU so I’ll have to wait. It cost me around $40 USD in shipping and taxes just to import a damn Pinecil to Canada, my country is ridiculous.

        • @The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Wanna to hear worse? In Turkey you can not import a phone with shipping. You have to bring it with yourself and register it with your passport after paying around 1000 dollars.

        • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not 100% sure on this but there is always the possibility your carrier could always block devices it does not recognize. I need to look more into this.

          Also, it seems that someone has already started to work on bringing mobile Linux “PostMarketOS” to the new Shiftphone. It’s not even released yet. If it’s officially supported, I’ll have a favorite brand for sure. That kind of software support would be unprecedented (except maybe the Librem as mentioned earlier but their hardware repeatability is much lower).

    • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Yup.

      In the 2000s (very young at the time) I sometimes thought about how awesome it would be if we had devices where we could go on the Internet from everywhere.

      I do not want the world back where people could only look things up on the Internet from home or work or where there is a desktop computer.

  • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    I’m pretty sure that dumb phones, aka feature phones, are still a thing.

    It’s just that nobody talks about that stuff.

    Sometimes they’re marketed as a “senior phone”… Because you know old people. I guess?

  • @rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Most dumb phones aren’t.

    Dumb, that is. Virtually all of them have some version of Android or KaiOS or some other full-fat OS cosplaying as something “simple”. Litmus test: does your “dumb phone” come with a map app? A Facebook app? Can you install apps from an external source? If so, you don’t have a dumb phone.

    The hallmark of a dumb phone is the lack of an OS that boots. You turn it on, and everything should be instantly and immediately available, loaded from ROM. No boot sequence, no waiting for anything to load.

    The only truly “dumb phone” out there - as something “new” and not actually vintage - is the Rotary Un-Phone.

  • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I don’t want it to be “dumb” but I’m fine if it’s more “basic”

    I think less technology would be pleasant.