You must log in or register to comment.
Let them eat each other alive. That would be a 2 for 1 offer for saying fuck off to two giant asshole companies
“allows“
They’ve been forced to and it shows because they didn’t even bother with the iPad
Typical Apple behaviour, shitting in everybody else’s bullshit pie while keeping their own bullshit pie completely pristine.
By allowing emulators on the app store… Apple Bad?
Google Play has emulators too
That’s good!
Am I crazy? Their line of reasoning is odd no?
I always feel like I’m taking crazy pills when the subject of Apple comes up on lemmy.
On android you can build any open source emulator from source code and install it on your device, you may even build app inside android device and I’ll tell you how, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76763954/android-app-development-with-visual-studio-code https://github.com/vhqtvn/VHEditor-Android
Your question whether rhetorical or not is presented as a bad faith question. And to answer your question…yes. Apple and for walled garden environment.
Yes a walled garden is bad (at least often). But I can see how this specifically is bad.
It’s a good thing.
How is it typical apple behaviour to allow emulators?
Legislation was needed to force them to change
Apple bad for walled garden environment, so when Apple eases the restrictions on their walled garden, voluntarily or involuntarily, they’re still bad?
What are you doing? Like what’s your end goal here? Are you attempting to make a point? Are you trying to say something deep? You’re on fucking Lemmy arguing that apple good for walled garden and locked down systems…
Holy shit, it’s so easy to make people on this site mad by just responding to their comments. I’m literally just trying to make sense of your shit take.
So it’s good faith to say that when Apple does something good that they are bad and it’s typical of them to be bad?
Nope. But if it takes legislation for them to change something for the better instead of offering it then yes.
Good thing that didn’t happen here, then?
Huh, I knew that Nintendo had braindead fanboys but I’m genuinely surprised anyone thinks that corporations teaming up to kill emulation is a good thing.
*Nintendo quietly shows Apple Yuzu’s corpse in their trunk while staring sternly and slowly and audibly tapping a bloody baseball bat against the ground behind their back… *
Apple showing Nintendo their mountain of cash, then cuts them from the AppStore.
Yeah, I somehow doubt that Apple could be done in like Yuzu. They’re in a different ballpark, league, and game.
Apple has make a lawsuit last long enough to not make it worth it money. The worst a lawsuit against Apple did is stopping sales of Apple Watches for a week.
I like that you portrayed Nintendo with an ambiguous gender
I think “Nintendo” should be treated like a plural noun because they consist of many lawyers.
And only lawyers.
fight asshole companies, fight
App developers are responsible for the content the emulators can include (which are called mini-apps)
So let’s say I am Square Enix. I own the rights to Chrono Trigger. I can release an emulator with Chrono Trigger SNES ROM and can sell it as Chrono Trigger. I cannot have said emulator allowed to run Super Mario World, as that would get my program delisted from App Store.
This is not limited to just emulators though. We can classify the games in roblox as mini apps; so let’s say if Roblox doesn’t remove a game that clearly infringes copyright; they too will get removed from App Store. (Which is one of the many reasons why they try to remove the games that contain these content)
The wording of the new App Store rules say developers are responsible for any software offered in an app, and there’s been a bit of debate going on as to what that means in practice.
I haven’t heard if any emulators have or haven’t passed Apple’s review process yet.
Emulation for game preservation is fine, these ones getting taken down by Nintendo aren’t doing that. They are promoting piracy, providing the keys to play games, and making a profit.
Theres ways to go about this legally, advocating piracy, profiting and providing the keys are what’s not legal.
deleted by creator
Yuzu was not a legal emulator, they pretended to be while promoting piracy. If they were a legal emulator, they would still be around.
https://twitter.com/0JMachine/status/1764707969092985085?s=20
deleted by creator
Your confusing the product and the creators of it.
They are one and the same. If you knew where to look, they provided means. This is one case that didn’t even make it to discovery before settling, that just tells you how fucked they were and how wrong they did everything.
What’s wrong with Twitter? You could also just google this and find the information yourself, don’t know why I have to provide what should be common knowledge on this subject. They were not a legal emulator, full stop, sorry.
Removed by mod
Queues arguement doesn’t work since they didn’t reverse engineer their key….
I’m not defending Nintendo, I am providing information on the subject, it just unfortunately only looks bad for one side here. I even said legal emulation has its place…. So how am I “shill” and “defending” Nintendo? Because I proved you are fucking wrong? Lmfao. Why is THAT always the comeback in this scenarios?
Objection hearsay! Some jackass on Twitter saying some crap without proof is not proof. We need screenshots of the actual incidents at the minimum.
arrrghhhh
Where can I find these emulators? I need names!
Say the line, Bart!
Ay Caramba!?
“…It is always morally correct…”
“to pirate nintendo games!!”
Can apple even legally do this lol
Emulators aren’t illegal. So why shouldn’t they allow it?
If so then how did Nintendo manage to take down yuzu?
By going after the encryption and decryption part rather than the hardware and software emulation part. And having a massive amount of money to spend on lawyers.
Having much greater lawyer force than a couple of developers. Nintendo would win even if they are not right. Or even if not win, those developers would go completely bancrupt for the rest of their lifes because of lawyers costs.
Couldn’t they outsource that decryption part to someone who is more grey area and incognito than the emulator devs?
Just make it possible to add this to the Emu and focus their development on the emu itself
Circumventing DRM is illegal under the DMCA, but the DMCA has an exception saying you’re allowed to ignore parts of the DMCA if it’s for purposes of interoperability between different computer systems. It’s that exception that makes emulators legal in the first place. However, there’s no case law setting a precedent as to whether the DRM circumvention prohibition or interoperability exception wins when both apply.
That means that the decryption is in a grey area if it’s part of an emulator, but definitely illegal if it isn’t.
We also don’t know if this is an argument Nintendo relied on to stop Yuzu. Their initial court documents claimed things like emulators being totally illegal and only invented for piracy, which weren’t true, and they settled out of court, so the public can’t see what the final nail in the coffin was. It could simply be that they’d make Yuzu’s position expensive to defend with spurious delays until they were bankrupt or shut down and gave them all their money, which doesn’t require Nintendo to be legally in the right.
Not long before this, Dolphin’s Steam release was cancelled because Nintendo asked Valve to block it, so the Dolphin team double checked they were entirely above board with their lawyers. Despite Dolphin containing the decryption keys from a real Wii, and using them to decrypt Wii games, they were confident it wasn’t at risk. The keys are an example of a so-called illegal number, but they’re generally believed to not actually be illegal (hence the Wikipedia article about them featuring several examples). The decryption should be safe as the lawyers thought that if push came to shove, the interoperability exception would beat the DRM circumvention prohibition.
Nintendo would target the easiest target, which would still be yuzu
They didn’t. Nintendo and Yuzu came to an agreement and settled out of court.
They settled because they used an illegal key instead of making their own, which is the only legal way to do this for game preservation.
You act like laws aren’t just excuses.
there are no laws against emulators. Collusion, on the other hand, there are loads of laws against that.
