• @zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    Tom Bombadil was supposed to be in the movie but he forgot to actually appear and went a galavanting elsewhere during filming

  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 year ago

    Why didn’t just Tom wear the Ring as he makes passionate love with his wife, so he can force Sauron to watch.

    Sauron, who is a virgin, who never had a gf and was dismembered and reduced to a giant eye by a fucking human would realize he is nothing compared to Tom, whose girth is beyond even Eru Ilúvatar’s comprehension.

    Wishing to die but unable to kill himself as he doesn’t even have a fucking hand to pull the trigger, he would order his orc armies to piss on him, so that the flames of his eye can be extinguished and his mind can be set free of Tom’s all encompassing girth. His spirit would be released to the boundless void that ripples and contorts with Tom’s mighty thrusts and he would find no solace.

    Edit: When Tom thrusts his final thrust and shoots a billion Bombadillos deep into Goldberry’s loins, the impact would shatter Sauron’s soul into a billion Saurodillos and he would be free. When this happens, not even the wisest can tell.

  • @Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    TLDR?

    Sorry yes I only watched the movies, I read the Hobbit and gave up at LOTR 1 page 80 or so, when it was still random stuff not in the movies.

    • @Yamainwitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol. This might not be popular BUT there’s a reason he doesn’t make the cut in the movies or extended cut releases. Tom Bambodil is basically middle earth’s “MyStErIoUs WaYs.” This is a hot take but I would almost go so far as to say his existence in the world ruins the book, his songs/poetry are terrible and he’s just kind of there. He is meant to be a mysterious figure that lends to the overarching mystery of the world, one who has always been around and is so powerful he is basically a god, but doesn’t actually give a shit about the world outside of himself or the suffering of others. I see him as a vestige of JRRT’s catholicism seeping through, this ultimate force that could end the war but didn’t because reasons.

      Edit: grammar is hard after wine

      • @Bangs42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        his songs/poetry are terrible

        To be fair, Tolkien’s songs/poetry are terrible. He was a great writer, an amazing storyteller, and an unparalleled world-builder. But he was not a lyricist or poet by a long shot.

        The songs and poems do convey a lot of information and help build the world. But that doesn’t mean they’re good.

      • @whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The question of giving the ring to Bombadil to take it out of the equation is asked and answered at the council of Elrond - at no point he could or would end the war.

    • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Tom Bombadil is a weird character that appears early in the Hobbit’s journey in the first book.

      He lives alone in the forest with his wife and lives very carefree, despite potentially being the most powerful entity in all of Middle Earth or Arda in general. The ring has no effect over him, and he didn’t turn invisible when he wore it.

      Tom Bombadil is just sort of… A thing that happens. It has no real bearing on the story and contributes to almost nothing. He does save the Hobbits, twice; once from some grumpy tree and once more from some restless dead, but cutting him out entirely doesn’t change the story of The Lord of the Rings in any way, which is why he’s not in the movies.

      The only other mention of Tom Bombadil in all three books is Elrond hoping he would’ve accepted his invitation to his Council.

  • @mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I know some consider this basically heresy, but I think the books would have been better off without Tom as well. I love the trilogy to bits, but the first book suffers from pacing issues and the amount of space the Tom Bombadil section takes up is a major contributing factor to that.

  • @SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I saw the movies first. When I tell you I was shocked by tom bombadill I thought I had lost my mind or had a wrong version of the book. Maybe this was a prank. I had to google it to find out it was in fact reality

    • the_weez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I read the books as a youngin’ I was so pissed that they left my favorite character out of the movies. So I kinda had the opposite experience from you.

      • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I watched the movies first then read the books and was subsequently pissed when I realized what they left out lol.

        • @ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I read the books first, and while there are plenty of omissions and outright changes from the source material that I disagree with, cutting Tom Bombadil is not one of them.