• sab
    79•1 year ago

    I’m not sure I see the benefit of this. The point that Wikipedia might eventually become corrupted is made moot by the permissive licensing of the information there. The main challenge of the Wiki format is with fact checking and ensuring quality, which is only made more complicated by having a federated platform.

    ActivityPub is great for creating the social web. The added benefit of ActivityPub for non-social services is not obvious to me at all.

    That said, it’s a cool proof of concept, and I’m sure it can be useful for certain types of federated content management - I just don’t see how it could ever make sense as a Wikipedia alternative.

    • fᵣₑfᵢEnglish
      0•1 year ago

      I can definitely see it being a better alternative to that Fandom wiki site

      • @zarenki@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1•1 year ago

        The main reason people use Fandom in the first place is the free hosting. Whether you use MediaWiki or any other wiki software, paying for the server resources to host your own instance and taking the time to manage it is still a tall hurdle for many communities. There already are plenty of MediaWiki instances for specific interests that aren’t affected by Fandom’s problems.

        Even so, federation tends to foster a culture of more self-hosting and less centralization, encouraging more people who have the means to host to do so, though I’m not sure how applicable that effect would be to wikis.

  • @AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.worldEnglish
    36•1 year ago

    Rather than starting from scratch, would it make more sense to make an ActivityPub plugin for the open-source MediaWiki software Wikipedia runs on? MediaWiki already has some “interwiki” functionality that such a plugin could expand on, and you’d have the advantage of being able to fork content from WP and other MW projects without having to re-format it. Plus you’d be able to leverage other MW plugins—Semantic MediaWiki in particular could add a lot of useful functionality to federated wikis, like articles that could query and aggregate information from other federated articles rather than just linking to the text.

    • NutomicOPEnglish
      24•1 year ago

      Mediawiki is an extremely complicated project with 1.2 million lines of PHP. For me it was much easier to implement this project with technology Im already familiar with. But of someone wants to create a Mediawiki plugin I would be happy to see that.

  • GhostalmediaEnglish
    11•1 year ago

    This is a cool idea, but I highly encourage you to target mobile first. Reference works will get a LOT of mobile traffic. More than 80% of Wikipedia’s traffic is mobile.

    • NutomicOPEnglish
      7•1 year ago

      I’m not good at frontend development or webdesign so I definitely need help in those areas.

  • @nutsack@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4•1 year ago

    i was going to screenshot the mobile browser view but it looks like half the comments are ripping on it already

  • @spaduf@slrpnk.netEnglish
    2•1 year ago

    This is super exciting. I think one of the things a lot of people are missing here is the potential for wikis to augment existing fediverse communities. Reddit’s killer feature has always been the massive treasure trove of information for hobbyists and niche interests. There is huge potential in the fediverse to take advantage of that sort of natural collaborative knowledge building process.

  • ShadowRam
    1•1 year ago

    Interesting idea,

    But search sites currently can’t find anything in lemmy.

    So how will they link to this?