• Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    The irony of literally anyone (eligible) not voting for Biden specifically because of his handling of the Gaza situation, and thereby doing their part to help Donald “Gotta Finish the Problem” Trump win, makes my bones hurt. I hate this timeline and I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed and I did the same yesterday. Will vote for Biden in the end, but I registered my complaint. As best I can tell, his tone shifted after Michigan so we’ll see if there is more change on the horizon.

        • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m usually skeptical of protest votes, but these primary protest votes are actually effective for the same reason voting is effective. Politicians aren’t as static as we want to believe- their number one priority is reelection. When you vote, you are telling the candidates that you are politically useful and they will begin to pay attention to your needs. When you vote for all levels of government, you are giving deeper detail into what your needs are.

          If a significant portion of a district votes for a Democrat as president, and then a Republican for state representative, the democratic administration will likely make more conservative decisions if they see that portion of the electorate as critical to reelection.

          This naturally reveals a big problem with the electoral college, as there are maybe 5 states with critical demographics needed to win reelection. The people in Ohio, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan are more influential to the type of administration a Republican or Democrat would run.

          If the Gaza protest vote happened in Washington State or California, I doubt Biden would have reacted as much as he did for Michigan. That said, this problem politicians face goes from the President of the US down to the president of your HOA. So I’ll acknowledge that the power of voting fluctuates depending on the specific outcome you are measuring, but there are so many variables. In political science you need to learn to live with paradoxes, and this may be one.

          Either way, I believe we should keep voting; they are paying attention.

      • Muzle84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There are primaries for Dems? I thought Biden was automatically the candidate as current POTUS.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      If any American ever has any questions about the Weimar Republic and why Germans didn’t stop Hitler when they still had a chance to do so, just point them to the run up to the 2024 presidential election. People who secretly want fascist leaders will always have an excuse, if one goes away, they already have another excuse waiting.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes and these people become excessively angry with you when you point it out. Their goal isn’t really to find a solution, it is to express discontent. They are divorced enough from reality that when you mention that Trump would be worse, they tend to lash out at you instead.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ha I was debating (?) some gradbears with the argument that not voting against Donnie would result in more suffering but their replies can be summed up as “not my problem, I’d feel worse if I did”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      The irony of literally anyone (eligible) not voting for Biden specifically because of his handling of the Gaza situation

      I left my primary ballot blank. There was nobody on the ticket who wasn’t going to continue the genocide (with perhaps Marianna Williamson as an exception, but I’m not indulging her vanity campaign). Come November, I suspect I’ll be in the same spot. Two candidates who are endorsing genocide, with the caveat that one is waving an Israeli sports pennant while the other repeatedly insists he feels really bad about it.

      I hate this timeline and I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

      Swing by Gaza. We’ll sell the Israelis the next round of ammo used to wipe you off the face of the Earth.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s a good thing that the only responsibility of a US president is deciding what to do about Israel.

        If they were the only person able to veto something like a national abortion ban, or legislation criminalizing trans people, it would really mess with your calculus.

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hey don’t blame them they just learned about Kony sorry Palestine and now it’s the make or break thing for them

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s a good thing that the only responsibility of a US president is deciding what to do about Israel.

          Hey now, that’s not true. He’s also responsible for getting his Too Woke judicial nominees filibustered, appointing a bunch of corporate flacks to the Federal Reserve, doing photo ops at the US-Mexico border while wearing tacti-cool kit and frowning through a pair of binoculars, and fucking up the handling of the next environmental / weather disaster. And who can forget the most important job of any President? Fundraising!

          If they were the only person able to veto something like a national abortion ban

          Then we’re already fucked, because that would imply all this hemming and hawing about abortion being a losing issue for Republicans failed to pan out and now a bunch of sadistic right-wing fucks are crowding into the House and Senate.

    • Nevoic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If 2024 was the last election ever, then your logic makes complete sense, and I get to liberals every election is the last election ever, despite us seeing Trump’s desperate and flawed attempts at seizing power. He didn’t get more intelligent in the last 4 years or learn from his mistakes.

      Imagine a crazy, crazy world, where Trump wins in 2024 and there’s a 2028 election. I know this is hard for some moderate libs to fathom, but you should recognize it as a real possibility.

      If it’s incredibly clear that Biden lost because he’s Genocide Joe, then the next Democratic candidate might be someone younger who is ready to end the genocide (which the U.S is perfectly capable of single-handedly doing).

      I’ve met people online that absolutely refuse to even acknowledge this is a possible world. They think Genocide Joe is the absolute best, pro-Gaza leader the Democratic party could ever put forth, and that losing elections due to issues like supporting genocide could never change the rhetoric and actions of future candidates in the party.

      It’s fucking mind-numbing how little thought people put into this. Like I’m happy to agree that in a world where Trump wins, the years 2024-2028 are going to be worse in about every conceivable way, but then as we get into 2028 and beyond, there are scenarios that play out better for leftists in that world (e.g we get an anti-genocide, socialist leftist instead of some moderate Republican who is a reincarnation of Biden except on some social issues). The fact that moderate libs REFUSE to acknowledge this possibility is fucking exhausting.

      And I’m not saying that it’s guaranteed to be better 2028 and beyond, it’s absolutely not, nobody can make guarantees about the future, but there is undeniable potential value in having Biden lose this election when you look beyond the next 4 years.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Removed, rule 3:

          “Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”

        • Nevoic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re speaking in certainties when you cannot. The genocide has been perpetuated, on and off, for 75 years. This is the most killing we’ve seen in the region in a short span of time, but we have seen figures close to this in the past 75 years.

          Of course there’s a world where Trump is elected, and successfully aids Israel in the extermination of the Palestinians. But you have to admit that that world isn’t a certainty, even if Trump is elected.

          There’s also a world where Biden is reelected, his campaign keeps greenlighting the genocide with periodic rhetorical criticism, and then some other fascist Republican or moderate fiscal conservative Democrat comes in in 2028 and finishes the job (the Democrats now emboldened to further ignore the genocide because it costs them nothing).

          It’s easier online to speak in certainty about the future, I understand that, but please if you’re going to bother engaging please don’t do it in bad-faith and actually admit where your knowledge ends. You’re not clairvoyant.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            Of course there’s a world where Trump is elected, and successfully aids Israel in the extermination of the Palestinians. But you have to admit that that world isn’t a certainty, even if Trump is elected.

            You just need to read the headline to this post, not even the article, to see where this argument is a non starter.

            • Nevoic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t believe Trump’s campaign promises are unwavering truisms that come to fruition 100% of the time. I’m glad you have so much faith in the promises he makes though, so much so that you’d literally call them a certainty and disregard any other possible reality just simply on the basis that Trump said it.

              I’ve met a good number of Trump supporters that don’t even have this kind of faith, only his most devout followers take his promises as premonitions of the future.

      • joenforcer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Look up Project 2025. There will not be a 2028 election if Trump wins 2024. One Day Dictator Donnie won’t stop at one day.

        • Nevoic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          He already tried to seize the capital through force. He has failed, he was the president for 4 fucking years and couldn’t figure out how to dismantle the government. He’s incredibly incompetent, I don’t know why every liberal in the world is clutching their pearls like he’s some kind of mastermind who grew and learned how to overthrow the country.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s not like he’s the one coming up with the plan. Project 2025 was written by much more cunning schemers. There are people who saw him fail to take the capital by force, and now seek to enable his success next time.

          • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Trump is a figurehead. The man himself is nothing. If her gets elected, the smart people behind him who actually DO learn from past mistakes will have four years to reshape the government, and last time, things moved FAST.

            Not voting does not send the message you think it does. It sends the message that you’re fine with the status quo and content to sit home and let things play out. “Protest” voting in the final election within a 2 party system is the same as not voting. It’s winner take all, and nothing else matters to these people.

            • Nevoic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ve responded to this exact sentiment in at least 4 comments and it’s getting exhausting. Either find my response to this or don’t engage, I don’t really give a fuck. It can’t possibly be my responsibility to educate every genocide-agnostic moderate-lib on the material reality of elections.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Lol he already got the supreme court running interference for his attempted coup. Do you think the country is safe?

      • asim0v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        If Trump wins in 2024 there won’t be a 2028 election, or at least a not a real one.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      2 years ago

      “I don’t want to live on this planet anymore…” oh please, just stop. How horrible is your life? You sound like a whiny liberal. People are dying all over the world, being murdered for religious beliefs, sexual preference, politics…etc…and you don’t want to live because “that big bad republican might become President…” Please…

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ohh, just how will our little “But Biden saporz Genocide”-crybabies now explain away their “both side is bad” bullshit?

    • StantonVitales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The fact that people legitimately act like Trump is a better option for president than Biden because he hadn’t up until this point actively voiced support for Israel speaks volumes about how fucking doomed and politically ill-informed our country’s voter base is.

      • StantonVitales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What a uniquely disturbing inability to have any awareness of context whatsoever!

        Are you actually incapable of reading things as they’re written and just see words and react, or do you actually know what they’re saying and are just trolling? The issue they were very obviously addressing is that many people are acting as though Trump is somehow a better option because Biden supports Israel, so the question now becomes how will these people respond when they see that Trump (obviously) also supports what Israel is doing. I find it very difficult to believe that you don’t know that, but if you somehow don’t, how do you get around the world with such a limited capacity for extracting meaning the things people say?

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        Using the G word for the situation = instant disqualification from any serious discussion.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sorry. This ethnic cleansing is clearly genocidal by now. They want the Palestinians in Gaza gone, and neighboring countries are not capable or willing to take them. That leaves death as the most likely fate for almost all Gazans. A million kids live there for fuck’s sake. It’s evil Nazi shit being done by the very fuckers who claim criticism of Israel is antisemitism.

          They are Judeo-fascists, because no fucking group will ever be immune to fascism: Socialists, feminists, African Americans, trans people, every conceivable group of people for the rest of human history. There is no identity that cannot lead to fascism.

          • suction@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            have to say you’re being pretty colourful with the lingo here, but at the same time that reveals you’re not a serious person.

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Oh, got it. I can only use the term genocide after the genocide is fully completed. I guess it helps you virtue signal by saying “never again” without actually having to put in work when “again” comes around.

              Last time I listened to the “boy who cried wolf” argument, I was proven wrong. We should have listened when Trump was called a fascist in 2016. It was unpopular to use that F word then, but what else can you call the Republicans now? It’s just what they are.

              If you can’t use the word “wolf” until after it’s eaten all your sheep, you’re not a good Shepherd.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    But sure, yeah… go ahead and just not vote. Letting Trump in will be so much better for the Palestinians.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      A week ago, the difference between the two would have been that Trump would enable Israel in every way, while Biden would enable Israel in every way, but staffers would leak stories about how much Biden didn’t like Netanyahu from time to time. Now, Biden has started sending aid to Gaza while Harris is calling for a ceasefire, and this is entirely because 100K voters in Michigan voted uncommitted. When done properly, threatening to withhold your vote can be an effective way to make your voice heard.

      • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think you make a great point, but I would add a caveat. There IS a difference between Biden and trump. One will listen to protesters, and the other won’t. You can pressure Biden and he will change his position because he seems to care what voters think, and Trump doesn’t.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I agree with that. And, to be clear, I think there have always been tons of differences between Biden and Trump on almost every issue besides Israel/Gaza. I was just saying that, on this single issue, the difference between Biden and Trump would have been mostly rhetoric, not policy, up until the Michigan primary voters convinced Biden to change. I definitely didn’t mean to imply they were generally the same.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I’m not saying there’s been enough change, just that there has been some change, and it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

            Its definitely been a wake-up call to the party. Watching Biden shed 20% of Democratic voter turnout in a fucking primary is something. Obama and Clinton never had these kinds of problems in '12 and '96. And guys that did - Carter getting burned by Ted Kennedy in '80 and Bush to Buchanan in '92 - should have been a warning to the party as a whole.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah, I’ll be honest, I’m very worried about this election. I’m still unhappy with Biden’s approach to Israel, but at least now they can credibly argue that voting for him would be harm reduction for Palestinians. Maybe that will be enough to drive turnout.

      • stinerman@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        this is entirely because 100K voters in Michigan voted uncommitted

        Objection. Assumes facts not in evidence.

        To be clear, I have no problem with people in Michigan voting uncommitted, I just don’t think you can draw that line.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m afraid that there was a near instantaneous shift in his rhetoric after Michigan.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Biden’s entire approach to Isreal changed almost on a dime after that primary. He started aid drops to Gaza, Kamala Harris suddenly started using the word, “ceasefire,” he brought Netanyahu’s chief opponent to discuss the humanitarian crisis in Gaza…Biden obviously didn’t come out and say, “I’m changing my approach to Isreal because I’m afraid of losing Michigan,” but it’s pretty clear why this shift is occurring.

          • stinerman@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s certainly possible. My opinion has long been that politicians are not really all that responsive to public opinion.

            • joenforcer@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              When your representatives are Republicans, that’s pretty much true. My blue representatives actually seem to care and I have first-hand experience with this.

        • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          The ‘uncommitted’ voters will think that they changed Biden’s mind, but most likely he was going to start sending aiding to Gaza anyway. He doesn’t like Netanyahu and probably genuinely does want peace.

          At the same time the ‘uncommitted’ stunt has turned voters against Biden. Remember the average voter is functioning at grade 8 or grade 6 level. Educated voters will see this as the political maneuvers that it is, the average ‘grade 6’ mental age voter will think ‘Biden sucks’, and not vote.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Letting Trump in

      Winner-take-all electoral college means you never really had a voice in the matter.

      You should have moved to a Blue State before 2020, so your physical presence could be used to tip how many electoral votes that state produced, if you really cared about stopping Trump in 2024. That’s the only consequential method of putting a (very tiny) finger on the scale of a Presidential contest.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    So he openly proposes the Endlösung? Wherever you are in the US, kick some grandpa’s ass (provided they helped rid Europe of Hitler) and stump their noses into this topic so they see what Trump is.

    • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are only about 325,000 WW2 veterans left alive in the US. They are not a significant voting block.

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They will never see what Trump is. Orange Hitler could break into their house in the middle of the night and rape their wife while beating their children while they look on in awe at the honor of being visited by Satan’s enforcer. It’s what cults do.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Biden: We’ve been reluctantly supporting a very close ally, but it’s gone too far, and now we’re publicly condemning while admittedly still funding them. It’s a complicated situation, and I’m a cautious centrist.

    Trump: Why are there still buildings standing in Gaza? That won’t happen on my watch. May as well wipe out the West Bank while we’re at it.

    For the life of me, I can’t tell the difference. I have no idea who to vote for to help the Palestinians.

    • Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is that what Biden has said or is that what you want him to say?

        • Nudding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          What about his actions? How many bombs used in this genocide were sent by the US?

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            We live in a democracy. Maybe you’re thinking of the Arab states surrounding Israel, where one guy decides everything?

            We don’t send bombs to Israel because they need them to kill Hamas. Israel makes all the weapons they need to do that without America. It is a nuclear power. America sends weapons to Israel because of the threat of Iran. And it’s not going to stop doing that because of a local land dispute. Our alliance with Israel is about avoiding a war with Iran, which would result in tens of millions of deaths.

            10,000,000 > 30,000. Simple as that.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Trump is so dumb he destroys the carefully crafted russian narrative that actually might have won hin that whole thing, because some leftist are just to dumb. It’s stupidity all the way down and up.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah but deciding not to vote for Biden just feels like a good trendy way to express my sympathies with Palestineans… /s

    • Kiryu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hope this gets posted in all the leftist boards. People need to understand Biden is a continuation of the United States’ wishy-washy policies on Palestinians whereas Trump is pedal to the floor full acceleration towards genocide. Biden has shown he can at least be pressured into taking minor steps in the right direction. Being able to claim moral purity at the expense of a genocided Palestine will ring pretty hollow.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Plus the fact that Biden is definitively anti Ukrainian genocide, and Trump would not only pull US support of Ukraine, he would actively try to discourage NATO

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The “ppl” pushing the narrative ur complaining about arent on Ukraines side, nor or they on the side of NATO. Theyre busy convincing everyone they can that literally all western news is propaganda and the only true news will come from state sources in russia, china, etc.

          The goal when engaging that side should, for the sane, anyway, always be not to convert the person ur speaking to, bc even if they arent bots/shills, their bad faith arguments turn aggressive incredibly quickly. Instead, the goal should be to demonstrate to the onlookers the absurdness of the tankie’s position, and who it benefits/who is responsible for fabricating the position in the first place.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Theyre busy convincing everyone they can that literally all western news is propaganda and the only true news will come from state sources in russia, china, etc.

            you made this up

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean if we start talking about all the horrible things that will happen under a Trump presidency, we’ll never stop.

          Until the men with guns put black bags over our heads and shove us into vans in the middle of the night.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Looking forward to what the Republicans cosplaying as leftists use instead of “genocide Joe” now that Donald is calling for a final solution.

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Along with what everyone else is saying, I think they could probably still try to make an attempt at taking like, a false moral position, along the lines of an accelerationism-style “oh, well, trump seeking to escalate the war would end it more quickly, thus, saving more lives in the long run” kind of thing. Obviously based on kind of false pretenses, but then, I think a lot of their political positions kind of assume war and resource extraction as an inevitability, and power as an ultimate moral good, on a deeper level, and the fascism and propaganda mind games they play are just kind of a stupid extension of that.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Pick one:

          • Geriatric Joe, the president too senile to make up his mind on which side to support.

          • Gray-area Joe, the weak president that refuses to take a stance on foreign affairs.

          • Bystander Biden, the president that did nothing to end the Israel-Palestine war.

          And so forth. They’ll always find some other stupid thing to blame him for.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyzdeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s an election year, they’re just trying to get their favorite orange fash in office. Horseshoe theory is a bitch.

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Its not republicans, its russian shills/bots… ok wait… yeah, guess ur right.

          And for the life of me, his correct name that ive been pushing since 2019, is Status Quo Joe. It was an insult then, cant believe its a vague defense now.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Biden is a continuation of the United States’ wishy-washy policies on Palestinians whereas Trump is pedal to the floor full acceleration towards genocide.

        If these are the only options that our system offers us, then why shouldn’t we demand our system be replaced?

        Democrats are inadequate, Republicans are worse. If this is the only choice available within the United States, then why do we citizens allow the United States to continue?

      • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        United States’ wishy-washy policies on Palestinians

        Wishy-washy policies is my favorite way to say “apartheid ethnostate”

      • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have a strict “no genocide” policy. Candidates that promote, endorse, allow, or sit idly by and let others do genocide are gonna be a no go from me.

        It’s not going to change unless we make demands.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I have a strict “no genocide” policy.

          That’s not one of the options though. You get to pick which genocide. You either get restrained genocide, or full genocide with a side of dismantling American democracy.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              If I have kids, I genuinely hope they ask me that. I hope they get angry at me, because the concept of a tacit genocide supporter being the lesser evil is unthinkable. I want them to live in a world where there aren’t moral conundrums like that, and the closest they come to them is in gritty video games and academic hypotheticals.

              I’m willing to support the lesser evil and have blood on my hands so they can live in a better world and condemn me for it. I will be thrilled if that comes to pass.

            • skeptomatic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              You mean critical thinking?
              As soon as it’s assured Trump loses, and the subsequent cou de tat is quelled, you can all camp the White House front lawn and shake the fences, throw red paint, call old Biden an accessory to murder. Fill your boots.

              But not before.

              Balancing on the tightrope with hell yawning below, is hardly the time to consider changing your shoelaces.

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                As soon as it’s assured Trump loses, and the subsequent cou de tat is quelled, you can all camp the White House front lawn and shake the fences, throw red paint, call old Biden an accessory to murder. Fill your boots.

                None of that will cause any structural change, which is why it is permitted

                How can we reshape the United States such that genocide is never permitted again?

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Happily, and I’ll teach them how to do the same, when necessary. Unlike your parents apparently.

              Sometimes there’s no good choice, only bad and worse. That’s how life works and I’m sad your parents never prepared you for that.

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Sometimes there’s no good choice

                Why?

                And what conclusions can be drawn about who does and does not hold power in the United States?

                And what should be done to the United States to correct this?

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am convinced a good chunk of the “genocide Joe” crew are agents provocateurs.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It must feel amazing to be held hostage by a ineffective political party that knows that if you don’t vote for them then the alternative will be much worse.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m sure some people are having the same sentiments about Donald Trump right now.

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Trump loving other countries doing “strong man” types of atrocities? Who would have thought!

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve asked it before, but I wonder how Hitler would react to Israel. Probably be beaming with pride, like a master does when their apprentice surpasses them. I imagine when Netanyahu finally shuffles his way off this mortal coil, and his soul goes wherever Hitler’s is, Adolf will probably shake his hand.

      • joenforcer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Unless I’m getting wooshed on sarcasm… you realize Israel is full of the descendants of the Jewish people Hitler displaced, right?

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, no kidding he would. All the tankies acting like “both sides” is a legit position probably cannot see just how much worse he’ll be…

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are people really surprised about his attitude about this? From Mr. “You have to kill their families!”?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      The general election will be a competition between two senile goons shouting “I love Israel more than you!” at one another from across a debate stage.

      Then we’ll all get an earful about how voting is a civic duty and you need to choose which one is the lesser of the two evils.

    • dasJot@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Given his ties to Russia, I believe a fall from a hospital window would be more realistic.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That might spark a civil war as his followers lash out, at the very least a wave of terrorism for the death of their messiah

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        That might spark a civil war

        Considering how Trump loves alienating the military it will probably be a very short one.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Pretty sure they’ll cower behind their AR15s and talk loudly, and do nothing.

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Me thinks it would be the fastest civil war in history.

        My estimation of how this might go: Goods stop arriving in stores, diabetics can’t get insulin, critical infrastructure gets targeted first. Good luck maintaining internet connectivity. The masses would do more damage to themselves than either political opposition.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Would be fun to shrug it off like that but they are infested in the military, courts, police, and the Republican party

          You can look at the history of white America getting away with murders of coloured folk to see why it is a scary prospect

          • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh, I’m by no means shrugging it off. Thousands would die. I’m simply saying, it would end quickly and stupidly. We are too interdependent on our institutions to have an effective civil war.

            It would also take a seperate opposing body to attack another. How would republican actors know who is ideologically to the left of them?

            Unless they employ some type of guerilla warfare but, I don’t think there are enough people committed to trump to get that done effectively.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        We’re near the cusp anyway, though not on the precipice. The worst thing though is knowing the Maga cult is likely to try and rise up if anything happens to Trump they don’t like, including not winning the Presidency. This is depressing because on the other hand I do NOT foresee the Left doing the same.

        They should.

        They won’t though.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Republicans don’t view him as a “messiah.” They view him as the opposite of Biden.

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Meh, there’s some idiots out there that take it too far…just like how some of ya’ll truly believe Biden is a good President…

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      Only on Liberal Lemmy and Liberal Reddit can you threaten to kill a Republican politician, and everyone just laughs it off…

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        We don’t rejoice in the mass-murder of innocents like your ilk does, right-winger - we prefer the violence to happen to those who deserve it.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Rejoice? Lol…if it was up to the RIGHT, anyone who commits murder, child molestation, rape…etc…would be hung on the spot. It’s you liberals that try and see the silver lining in all the horrible things that people do…

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            anyone who commits murder, child molestation, rape

            You want to see right-wingers hang? So do I!

            It’s you liberals

            Where did you get the idea that liberals aren’t right-wingers?

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Oh geez…

                “Geez”?

                Careful there… some of your christofascist brethren might see that as idolatry. You wouldn’t want to differentiate yourself from that crowd, now do you?

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh, good.

    So the only reason to not vote for Biden is also a reason to not vote for trump. At least Biden seems to be at least signaling for cease fires.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s not much, but at least Biden is malleable on this. He can be persuaded to make the attempt to try to slow the Israelis down, maybe even stop arms shipments to Israel altogether (or at least add conditions). If Trump comes in, he’d probably go in the complete opposite direction out of spite for liberals and would try to help the Israeli genocide even harder. It’s not a great choice, but the choice of least harm in this case is still Biden.

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Trump also repeatedly claimed that if he were president, there would be no war between Israel and Gaza. “It would have never happened if I was president,” he said of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack against Israel, in which more than 1,100 Israeli and foreign nationals were killed. “They wouldn’t have done it to me, I guarantee you that. They did this because they have no respect for Biden and frankly they got soft,” he added.

    uh huh

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel_in_2017 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel_in_2018

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_airborne_arson_attacks

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel_in_2019 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel_in_2020

    They would never have done it if he was president. They only attacked because of biden.