• @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 year ago

    Sounds like a hell of a lot of money for a CEO who kept insisting that he had to kill 3rd party apps because Reddit still isn’t profitable.

    • @DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      651 year ago

      “Reddit isn’t profitable because leadership is wildly incompetent, so let’s pay them an exorbitant amount of money instead of using that money to properly fix things or make any genuine improvements to anything.”

      -reddit

      • @the_grass_trainer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’ll say “to the moon” with some animation, and then they’ll take away some other feature of the site because it’s “too expensive to maintain”.

    • @space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Let’s be real, they did it because they didn’t want people training AI models without paying them. They didn’t give a shit about 3rd party apps.

      • @loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m convinced there was more to it. Otherwise they’d have worked with the app devs to find a mutually beneficial solution. Instead they just acted like massive, deaf assholes through all the drama, blackout…

        Of course, it’s totally possible they’re also insanely stupid, arrogant assholes.

        • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It makes the ridiculous prices they were quoting make sense. Because giving API access is giving a key to all that data, which they can then turn around and covertly sell access to. So they priced it so that they wouldn’t have to sell the data at wholesale value to apps that could turn around and undercut their AI training prices.

          It’s the same reason why they were considering blocking Google search because Google (or any search engine) uses a crawler to look at all that data and you can’t allow Google to continue without leaving it open to any other crawler, like say an AI training data crawler.

          Same thing with any push to make users log in to view comment threads (and it wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what Musk was thinking of when he was doing/considering the same with Twitter). If only users can access the comment data, then it’s easier to see when a user is reading too much data, or rate limit them. Also the move towards only showing a bit of a comment thread by default.

          But that data is the only reason people visit the site and provide more data, so I don’t see this problem ever fully going away for them. The problem they are trying to solve is how to give access to enough data to engage users enough to provide more data while preventing AI trainers from getting that same data for free. If I wanted to, I bet I could write something that would fill a database with comment data and metadata while browsing normally in less than a day and then a bit longer to automate the browsing entirely (depending on what kind of bot detection the site uses). There’s no way for Reddit to stop the manual browsing version and the automated one will be an arms race that will also end in no way for it to be stopped because it emulates a real user to an undetectable level.

    • Brownian Motion
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -61 year ago

      I’d pick prohibited transaction. I live in AU. NYSE won’t let me trade there.

      Either that or “hate” - all redditors can get involved, but not you because you are not from the US. Sounds like communism.

    • Stamets
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I take offense to this. I have a little dick. I don’t destroy everything for everyone around me while shitting myself violently. I say he has Caillou energy. Arrogant, narcissistic, hideous, an abject freak, a mistake granted legs and will hopefully suffer from a terminal illness.

      Fuck Caillou. Fuck Steve Greedy Pig Boy Spez Huffman

  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    They lost 93 million on 2023, and paid the CEO more than double that.

    Nope - can’t think of a single thing they could do to make reddit profitable.

    • @Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Well kinda but not really, he owns around 4% of Reddit which is where the $193m comes from because of the $5b valuation.

      Still, fuck spez

    • @Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      They paid him just shy of 400k. The stock and options he was given have nothing to do with reported losses. It’s all monopoly money until IPO, them we’ll see what it’s worth.

      • @MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Paying yourself 190 million in stock options when the company is running at a loss is pretty much blatantly admitting that the company is severely overvalued. My guess is that it will tank 90% once it goes public. If not more, Reddit produces nothing inherent of value and they are really hostile to their users.

  • @slimarev92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    He wasn’t paid that amount. He got 341,000 in cash and the rest was in stocks and options (which will only be worth that much if the company performs well financially). This us place is just like Reddit, nobody ever reads the article.

    • @nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      It doesn’t really need to perform well financially. He can sell everything as soon as it goes public and retire

      • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -71 year ago

        Still not how that works, if he wants cash he has to sell, selling stocks is heavily taxed. Now he can take a loan against the stocks but if they don’t do well then he’s not going to get much for them. It’s a risk and taxes is paid like it or not.

        Still a shit system, but that’s a different discussion, but they pay taxes.

        • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          I wouldn’t say heavily taxed. If he exercised his options more than 6 months ago he’ll pay the flat 15% capital gains tax. Whereas his effective tax rate on his salary will be around 30%

            • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              I have read that that’s one of the wealthy’s “big secret” ways to avoid taxes. They allegedly live off of those loans as their spending money, while the value of the investments they use as collateral increases over time, but they don’t pay taxes on the Unrealized gains. And they can keep borrowing more as needed with those same investments as collateral.

              I don’t have the whole scam figured out though. I’m not sure how they pay back the loans without having to cash out something that would generate a tax burden.

              • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                71 year ago

                I’m assuming s long s they spread out payments over time and roll lots of the debt into the next loan.

                That’s how they become too big to fail at their banks. At least that’s the Donald Trump method. His problem is that he has fuck all for collateral at this point.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          The interest rate on taking loans against assets is usually less than paying the taxes for selling the same assets

          • falsem
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            It’s taxed as income when you receive it. If you hold onto it for over a year then sell it you pay capital gains (which are lower) on the difference between the grant price and current price (if it went up).

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If they sell after holding it for more than a year, if they short term sell the stock under a year it’s a normal income tax on said stock.

              • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I’m not disagreeing with you, I think it’s a shit system as well, I’m just pointing out what a lot of people seem to think is 0 taxes on stocks.

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            That still requires you to make sure the stock are worth something, and you have to pay interest on that loan.

            I think people are thinking I’m defending the system, I’m not, I’m just pointing out how it works.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This place is also just like reddit in that comments like yours seeking to seem smarter than everyone else by pointing out technicalities in the article as evidence everyone has the wrong idea, without appreciating the full context, and deliberately ignoring the overall point.

      Executives paid in stocks and options are completely normal, and those stock options have a value. Moreover, those things were not given to other employees nearly as much as they were given to the CEO.

      The actual dollar amount he receives from Reddit is not what matters. What matters is the amount of compensation given to him in comparison to everyone else at Reddit and to other CEOs at other companies, especially when taking his performance into account.

      The point is Reddit is effectively giving way too much of its value to one person who has done little to actually make it profitable in all the time he’s been there while routinely making mistakes and allowing scandals that have hurt Reddit’s reputation.

      • @fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        The context is important since it informs us about why he’s doing this, which is probably to further inflate his stock value

    • TheOneCurly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      But also Tim Cook’s total compensation for 2022 was $99 million and Satya Nadella’s 2023 was $48 million. Paying him more than CEOs of actually profitable companies and what amounts to nearly 1/4 of revenue is a pretty big outlier.

      • @slimarev92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Arw you suggesting that reddit shares are going to be worth a lot of money? I see a an 18 year old company that still can’t turn a profit, so I don’t exactly see how the IPO can be a success.

  • @JonnyRobbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Honestly, I’m kinda looking forward to the IPO - because it might be the last enshittification straw that breaks the camel’s neck that will finally drown reddit for what it has become.

  • @answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    So why does your CEO get paid quarter of a billion a year if they had to hike their APIs unreasonably and kill all 3rd party apps because “reddit wasn’t profitable” despite not paying a dime to the mods running their website niether to contribitors, posters nor users ?!?! Reddit is scummier than Uber

  • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    This is such an amazing grift. I can’t wait until more social media firms start trying to direct-market their stock to their user base.

    • AutistoMephisto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      And watch as being a shareholder confers no tangible benefits for owning stock in the website of which you are a user, or worse, you get benefits, but they are limited to how much stock you have.

  • @dezmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    So my 16 year account with 90k legit comment karma wasnt good enough to be invited?

    Now I dont get to early participate in the fomo panic IPO being forced by investors?

    I could’ve made or lost tens of dollars.

    • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m at 10 year with about 500k combined. They sent me one. I laughed. Made me feel about as special as being given a pizza Friday at a job I’d been working for just as long. Actually, I would have been happier with the pizza.