I was pretty hyped for the new prince of persia game (the lost crown), but come to find out it’s only available on ubisoft’s proprietary launcher or epic games. Nope, and nope.

I just want to have it available on my usual storefront, Steam, but it’s been decidedly omitted. As a long time fan of the old games, this kind of hurts. Especially since many of the others -are- available on Steam.

I wonder if/when it will come out for Steam. These platform exclusivity deals need to die.

Edit: It’s also available on several consoles, my post was just from a pc gamer’s perspective.

      • @Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        481 year ago

        On their own game engine.

        Built to showcase their specific VR hardware. That they built after getting burned from multiple VR companies who abused Valves good will of providing access to their patent protected VR tech for free, to help accelerate the VR industry.

      • @TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        …a platform that works much better than the others… and a game that has been made with more love than anything in the past half a decade

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    651 year ago

    I’ve been boycotting Ubisoft for years, haven’t missed a damn thing.

    • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      I’ve been boycotting Ubisoft for years, haven’t missed a damn thing.

      Yeah, there are so many great games by non-shitty developers. Skipping Ubisoft, EA, and Activision entirely is not only possible but there are more great games left than one can play anyway.

      • technomadOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Yeah, that’s pretty much where I’m at with gaming now. Why settle for a subpar experience? I don’t have the time or finances for that.

    • @cottonmon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, they’re a pretty shitty company. Weren’t they one of the first companies to implement always-on DRM?

    • @emogu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yep. Gog is probably where we should all be getting our games tbf. Being mad that a game is available on one drm store instead of another drm store is kind of silly. In either case we’re only buying the license and not actually owning anything.

  • BillDaCatt
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    You can be sure that even the Epic version will still require the Ubisoft launcher. That is how all of my Steam purchased Ubisoft games are with the exception of the first Assassin’s Creed which predated the Ubisoft launcher. All of the others require it regardless of how I bought it.

    I’m going to wait for at least two or more years after release for the new Prince of Persia. My days of paying full price for Ubisoft’s games are over and recent statements from the CEO make me reluctant to ever buy their games again.

    • @hexabs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I tried playing the original AC games recently. They went back and integrated the launcher for those too smh

  • @MaximilianKohler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    It’s definitely convenient to have everything in once place, and Steam has way more features, but it’s good to avoid Steam becoming too monopolistic. We saw recently how badly that can go with reddit.

    Despite the widespread worshipping of Steam and GabeN, I’ve had lots of issues with Steam and Valve over the years.

    • @Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Convince other companies to be not shit competition then. Steam has its near monopoly because its competition is dogshit

    • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Avoid it in favor of GoG. Ubisoft can’t be trusted with a single drop of goodwill. As we can see by how they inject their clunky garbage manager even in games they sell through other stores.

  • @Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Cue the BUT STEAMS MONOPOLY idiots that completely ignore that Valve does nothing to stop anyone from competing with them, its just that anyone who has tried (outside GOG) has only produced anti consumer garbage

      • @Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Steams DRM is a VERY REASONABLE compromise between the interests of the devs and the consumer not wanting to be unfairly punished/annoyed. Steams DRM has literally NEVER caused me a headache aside from ONCE when steam was super new, its a non issue at this point

          • @Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Yeah, and when I show up to work, regardless of how much I like what I do or my coworkers, I expect to be paid for it, your point is? They created a form of DRM that is the least obtrusive out there, made it optional, and they gave us one of the best store fronts out there as compensation for it. Again, Ubi, EA, and Epic’s DRM is FAR WORSE.

        • @Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          People who understand nuance exists in this world. Steams DRM is a VERY RARE check to the internet that you own the game, and its an OPTIONAL thing that developers can choose. EA UBI and EPIC’s versions of DRM is FAR WORSE, and if you really want to be extreme in your hatred of even reasonable level DRM, GOG exists

  • Pyr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    I don’t know how they all manage to do it but EA, Ubisoft, and Rockstar are all my most hated companies of all time. They can make some good stuff, but I just absolutely hate how they all force people to jump through so much hoops just to play the games you pay them for.

    They force you to make accounts with them and use their stupid launchers which never work properly and are just advertisements. There have been so many times I just wanted to play a game and then forgot my password to the account and got locked out or the launcher needed an update and I had to wait like 20 minutes.

    Fuck all large game corporations.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Ubisoft make it pretty easy for me. I don’t have to worry about any of this, because none of their recent titles have been worth spending your money, let alone time on

    • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      That’s probably the best option. Considering how a Ubisoft exec said we should be “comfortable not owning games”, I wouldn’t trust anything purchased from them anymore.

  • k-rad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Ubisoft makes games for 13 year old mountain dew addicts

  • MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Most games appear on STEAM as well, some time (like 1 year) later. And they appear in much better shape with all patching and all.

  • Eggyhead
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    I’ve generally stopped buying Ubisoft games not because I don’t want to, but because of an issue with my Connect account. I think I had let my PS3 set one up for me back in the AC2 days with an email that is now long defunct (I deleted it after an acquisition that put my privacy at risk).

    Now they want me to verify that email so much that some games have actually refused to let me play. I contacted their “support” to request the option to update my email, proving that the registered email is inactive and that I am in complete control of the linked PlayStation account, but they pretty much told me to kindly F off because they care too much about my privacy (lol).

    I like some Ubisoft games, I just don’t have confidence spending money on anything they publish when I don’t know which ones might preemptively lock me out.

    I figure I’ll just replace the account entirely at some point, but only when there’s a game I absolutely think would be worth the hassle. It just sucks to see my OG account end up trashed over such a dumb reason.

    • @reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      i stopped buying ubisoft games when i noticed every single one of them just follows the same path of mediocrity. There is some story, you follow it and along the way there is some busywork like collecting pointless things. If there ever are new ideas its like something wished with monkey’s paw and its ultimately just more same old shit in new wrappings.

      • Eggyhead
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yeah I get it, but I don’t really mind that sort of stuff. You know what to do, it’s only mildly challenging, traversal is kind of fun. For me it’s relaxing.

        I can’t stand rogue-likes or arena style multiplayer games, so I never touch any of that.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I wonder if/when it will come out for Steam.

    Wait for year or two. It sucks.

    • @statler_waldorf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I heard from a “friend” that it runs very well on a Switch emulator on a Steam Deck. Some pre-rendered cutscenes are janky. It has a pretty cool system where you can take a screenshot that will pin to the map to indicate places you need to find back to once you unlock a new ability, and sometimes those don’t render right either. But otherwise, gameplay is flawless. Or so I’ve heard.