Grayox to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1390arrow-down185
arrow-up1305arrow-down1imageHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlGrayox to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-square@socphoenix@midwest.sociallinkfedilink23•edit-22 years agoEven if you take his statement as true it’s essentially arguing that historically genocides have happened and therefore Israel should get free rein to do one.
minus-squareGrayoxOPlinkfedilink12•2 years agoIts the exact same as when we talk about Police brutality and chuds say, ‘what about black on black crime’
minus-square@amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoEven if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
minus-square@ParsnipWitch@feddit.delinkfedilink-2•1 year agoSo instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
minus-square@amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoPalestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
minus-square@ParsnipWitch@feddit.delinkfedilink1•1 year agoDo you mean the settlements in the Westbank?
Even if you take his statement as true it’s essentially arguing that historically genocides have happened and therefore Israel should get free rein to do one.
Its the exact same as when we talk about Police brutality and chuds say, ‘what about black on black crime’
Even if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
So instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
Palestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
Do you mean the settlements in the Westbank?