• GrayoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      So most homeless habe jobs and most homeless dont have substance abuse issues. Lmao you must be a few crayons short of a full box.

      • @ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        -62 years ago

        You provided a source that says most of the homeless people are unemployed (53% of sheltered and 40% of sheltered have jobs). I provided a source that says 2/3 of homeless people have a history of drug and alcohol abuse. Do you not know what the words “most” and “majority” mean?

        • GrayoxOP
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          YOUR source said only 1/3 have a current substance abuse issue. And my source said that 53% of homeless folks in shelters have jobs while 40% of unsheltered folks have jobs. Most homeless folks start out using shelters and then transition to living on the street as they loss hope and ergo lose employment as their Material Conditions worsen. I am done arguing with your surface level understanding of a complex crisis. I pray you and yours never experience the crushing hopelessness that is living on the street and not knowing where you will rest your head.

        • @Mesophar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          The statistic says 1/3 of homeless population has issues with drugs/alcohol, and 2/3 of that 1/3 (or 2/9) have lifetime histories of abuse…

        • @radroot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          Your task is not to prove that drugs exist in the homeless community. For your point of them “fucking their lives up with drugs” to be true, you have to prove that their personal drug use was the catalyst for their living conditions. Do that or take the L.

          And to check yourself, you might want to look up the prevalence of drug use in more affluent communities. Hint: it’s a lot.

        • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          So even if you’re right, you’d condemn the other 1/3rd to homelessness to spite the others? People that made bad decisions are still people. I hope you’ve never made any bad decisions…

          Also, you’re condemning entire communities. People in desperate situations often have to turn to crime. Paying for their incarceration (or healthcare for that matter) COSTS MORE THAN JUST PROVIDING FOR THEIR BASIC NEEDS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

          Your stance is stupid, cruel, and shortsighted.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Two major schools of thought:

            We should help everyone, even if it means “bad people” can take some from the system.

            We should not help anyone but a tiny fraction of people so that no “bad people” can benefit from the system.

            Personally, I don’t really favor making the world that much worse to avoid some spoilage. We can do better than hurting a lot of people so we get the “bad” ones, who in my view are responding to material conditions, neurology, and history.

            I don’t know that any particular person said it, but I agree with the notion that the first sign of civilization was a human corpse, with a femur that had been broken, and then healed. A human with a broken leg is pretty screwed on their own. Someone had to help that person get food and water long enough for it to heal. Civilization is when we help each other fulfill our needs, and that’s beautiful.