@Clbull@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoAnti Homeless Architecturelemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imageAnti Homeless Architecturelemmy.world@Clbull@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareBlack616Angellinkfedilink4•2 years agoYes. But what we do now does absolutely not work so I would give stuff that was tested and works in a small sample size a shot.
minus-square@cricket98@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-2•2 years ago It was disproven You said it was disproven, how can something be disproved if you only tested it during a really short time period? Maybe you meant to say “evidence suggests” but that’s much different than something being disproven
minus-squareBlack616Angellinkfedilink3•2 years agoAgain, you are correct, but you already said that and it changes nothing about what I said in the second comment. What is your point?
minus-square@cricket98@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-3•2 years agoMy point is that you said the argument has been disproven when I believe it has yet to be fully understood.
Yes. But what we do now does absolutely not work so I would give stuff that was tested and works in a small sample size a shot.
You said it was disproven, how can something be disproved if you only tested it during a really short time period? Maybe you meant to say “evidence suggests” but that’s much different than something being disproven
Again, you are correct, but you already said that and it changes nothing about what I said in the second comment.
What is your point?
My point is that you said the argument has been disproven when I believe it has yet to be fully understood.