• @k_o_t@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    doesn’t worldwide just mean news from countries all over the world (including the us), doesn’t necessarily have to be anything specific that applies to all countries worldwide, no?

    • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Okay but then the title is completely misleading, because it says “worldwide”. So you could say that the title is misinformation.

          • @uthredii@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I would prefer not to change the title because:

            1. It does include comments from WHO that are not specific to the US:

              The World Health Organization on Thursday pushed back against the consistent chatter that the ultra-transmissible omicron coronavirus is “mild,” noting that the variant is causing a “tsunami of cases” that is “overwhelming health systems around the world.”

            2. The post title is the same as the article title.

            • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              It doesnt mention any specific country besides the US where health systems are currently overwhelmed (and i havent heard about that anywhere else). And i dont think we should keep the original title if it is clearly misleading like in this case.

              • @uthredii@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                I’m sorry but I still disagree.

                The article is quoting the world health organisation which is a global organisation. WHO is looking at data from the whole world, not just the US.

                • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Then you should link an article which talks about the whole world. The title doesnt reflect the content of the article at all.