Basically just what the title sais

  • @sia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    93 years ago

    How is Matrix centralised? It’s federated, just like email. If anything, mumble and IRC are more centralised.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      73 years ago

      Like 75% percent of the network runs on the official matrix.org servers and small scale selfhosting is not all that feasible, given how resource hungry Synapse is (although that is getting slowly better).

      • @sia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        43 years ago

        That’s not a technical but a social issue though. Matrix doesn’t have dozens but hundreds of installations. I guess your 75% are exaggerated.

      • @Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        43 years ago

        With that argument you should not like Lemmy. Way more than 75% of the network is from Lemmy.ca . It takes time for things to decentralise as long as the ability is there.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          53 years ago

          Matrix isn’t a super young project like Lemmy though, and Lemmy has the explicit goal to be lightweight to self-host. Oh and Lemmy doesn’t have a (basically) centralized identity server like Matrix.

    • SnowCode
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I know that, but I never seen any instance of Matrix that’s not matrix.org. Also email is becoming more and more centralized because almost everybody uses Gmail or something else from GAFAM. I mean, on paper it’s decentralized, but the fact everybody uses Matrix make it more and more dependent on one server.

      The centralization of IRC doesn’t matter though, the fact there is no chat history makes it irrelevant to be centralized or not, if Freenode dies, something else can replace it without any problem.

      Also a tiny note again about emails, due to the difficulty to setup an email server yourself (that doesn’t end up in the spams of everybody), I don’t really think emails are so decentralized in practice.

      TL;DR, there is a difference between the things on paper and the things in reality.

      • @sia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        13 years ago

        I know that, but I never seen any instance of Matrix that’s not matrix.org. Also email is becoming more and more centralized because almost everybody uses Gmail or something else from GAFAM.

        I like to quote myself on this one.

        That’s not a technical but a social issue though.

        • SnowCode
          link
          fedilink
          13 years ago

          There is a part of technical stuff though. If you have a very resource consuming technology, it’s obvious that less people are going to install it, which is the case of Matrix.

          Also, “social issues” can be managed, for instance, the main Framasoft closed the registrations of the main Mastodon instance because they thought the network was becoming too centralized on their instance.

          • @sia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            13 years ago

            If you have a very resource consuming technology, it’s obvious that less people are going to install it, which is the case of Matrix.

            Nobody in the real world cares about resources. I do, but that’s not the reason for people not adopting Matrix. It’s rather silly reasons like “it doesn’t have sticker packs!” or “I don’t understand where I need to create an account and why”.

            • SnowCode
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              I mean, people with low-end servers aren’t going to install a matrix server. So it’s limiting the decentralization of Matrix.

                • SnowCode
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 years ago

                  That means you will be more dependent on Matrix.org server, unlike in Mastodon, where there are many different instances.