“Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side. We will bury you,” he said quoting former USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev.

Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday Russia could have a right to go to war with NATO.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1252 years ago

    I wonder… does medvedev have enough wits left to understand that if Russia has that right… then everyone … has that right?

    They’re finding Ukraine difficult enough. Sure we’re sharing some toys (a lot of toys)… but they don’t have carriers or attack subs or missile destroyers…

    Threatening nato is not a sane decision to make. We might just take them at their word.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      762 years ago

      The toys we’re sharing are our older toys from the 80s and 90s even. Its not even the more deadly stuff we have…and they’re fighting against a force that’s getting a few weeks training on these toys and sent out into the field. If russia truly wants a 72 hour war…all it would need to do is attack NATO.

      • Ertebolle
        link
        fedilink
        282 years ago

        Yeah, Ukraine is excited about maybe getting some F-16s and how much that could help with the air war and meanwhile a couple of F-22s could take down a whole squadron of them.

        • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          A squadron of f-22s could take down most air forces.

          An air wing of f-22s could probably beat all other air forces combined, with the possible exception of china, though damn they would need to figure out how to keep reloaded.

          The USAF is the strongest air force in the world.

          The second strongest is the US navy Air wing.

          Think the marines are 4.

          Edit: this is an old listing, and russia was #3, so I think we actually have the trifecta.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            At one point I believe the Navy had more aircraft total than the AF, but they had them beat in specialization. AF does the heavy lift jobs, stealth, and up until recently, space launches and satellites. I think Navy and Marine F-18’s fly more sorties though.

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Yea I feel like all the charts with russia on them need to be redrawn… it’s clearly noticable at this point they’ve been a paper military.

          • flying_monkies
            link
            fedilink
            172 years ago

            Is the F-22 that much more capable?

            Yes, it is.

            The most successful jet fighter of the modern era is the F15 with a combat record of 104-0.

            In combat against F15s, the F22 is 41-1.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          It’s not the war, it’s the keeping.

          In any case, we’d probably bog down around the same time China and everyone else on that side got involved. I don’t think it would be as clean or as quick. But, yeah. We could definitely screw them pretty harshly without ever landing troops

          • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            232 years ago

            China and Russia have no military alliance, Xi is just taking advantage of the fantastic business opportunity that opened up for him for cheap Russian imports. If Chinese troops became militarily involved in Russian territory, it would probably be to acquire their claims over eastern Siberia, dating back to the Qing Dynasty. Otherwise he’s just be supporting a state that competes with him for the dominant regional position.

            The Tsar took that land from them, back in the day though. If you look at their current claimed territories, they never forgot. Maybe if Russia agreed to become a subject state of China, then they’d help militarily, but they’re certainly not friends or allies.

            Russia does have actual allies, but not many. And China isn’t one of them.

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            We don’t need to occupy Russia to stop them from continuing a war that they start. We can just destroy their equipment and manufacturing locations so their armed forces surrender.

          • bluGill
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            There isn’t anyone really on that side . China and NATO have differences, but China doesn’t have anything to gain from helping Russia, and nthey lose a lot is NATO loses. They will sit out. Similar with India, they will stay out . Iran or a few other small counties might consider joining, but I doubt it as most are smart enough to know that is suicide.

            • Hank
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Idk, China might see the spread of resources as a good opportunity to try an invasion of Taiwan.

              • bluGill
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                Maybe, Xi seems just sane enough not to try, but who knows. China and Russia can’t really win against NATO though they make things harder. India likely hates China enough to join NATO as well.

                Of course we are talking nuclear armed countries so everyone loses is possible.

              • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Putin made his move because Xi sounded like he was going to go at the same time.

                Xi was closing on HK and planned to switch immediately to Taiwan, even started the domestic pivot, then his navy told him they needed at least 5 years (honestly its more like 15, they are just starting carrier flight ops on the Liaoning and their newer ones aren’t shaken down yet).

                Putin had made his preparations, Xi hinted he might go anyway once the west was distracted.

                If daddy z hadn’t stayed in kyiv history would look really bad right now.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      America is not giving Ukraine the most advanced weapons and that is stopping Russia.

      Imagine if America used their pre advanced weapons.

      It’s posturing. Russia wants to look tough. They’re a paper tiger.

      • uphillbothways
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Total posturing. A few hundred of these would end the war overnight: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

        These aren’t even classified. Poland and Finland have them, today.

        Ukraine is keeping Russia in check with cardboard launched grenades. It’s pretty amazing, honestly; both how innovative Ukraine has been under duress with almost nothing, and how bad Russia has performed in this mess they’ve dumped themselves in.

        A few too many toes over NATO lines would decapitate the Kremlin, probably before anything could be done in response.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I have been highly impressed with the Ukrainian spirit and ingenuity.

          I have also been surprised at what a cluster fuck Russia has been on the battlefield. I expected them to perform better than they did. It shows how much they have declined from being a super power.

          The only issue I have is Russia has nukes and Putin is dumb enough to use them.