“Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side. We will bury you,” he said quoting former USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev.

Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday Russia could have a right to go to war with NATO.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1252 years ago

    I wonder… does medvedev have enough wits left to understand that if Russia has that right… then everyone … has that right?

    They’re finding Ukraine difficult enough. Sure we’re sharing some toys (a lot of toys)… but they don’t have carriers or attack subs or missile destroyers…

    Threatening nato is not a sane decision to make. We might just take them at their word.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      762 years ago

      The toys we’re sharing are our older toys from the 80s and 90s even. Its not even the more deadly stuff we have…and they’re fighting against a force that’s getting a few weeks training on these toys and sent out into the field. If russia truly wants a 72 hour war…all it would need to do is attack NATO.

      • Ertebolle
        link
        fedilink
        282 years ago

        Yeah, Ukraine is excited about maybe getting some F-16s and how much that could help with the air war and meanwhile a couple of F-22s could take down a whole squadron of them.

        • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          A squadron of f-22s could take down most air forces.

          An air wing of f-22s could probably beat all other air forces combined, with the possible exception of china, though damn they would need to figure out how to keep reloaded.

          The USAF is the strongest air force in the world.

          The second strongest is the US navy Air wing.

          Think the marines are 4.

          Edit: this is an old listing, and russia was #3, so I think we actually have the trifecta.

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Yea I feel like all the charts with russia on them need to be redrawn… it’s clearly noticable at this point they’ve been a paper military.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            At one point I believe the Navy had more aircraft total than the AF, but they had them beat in specialization. AF does the heavy lift jobs, stealth, and up until recently, space launches and satellites. I think Navy and Marine F-18’s fly more sorties though.

          • flying_monkies
            link
            fedilink
            172 years ago

            Is the F-22 that much more capable?

            Yes, it is.

            The most successful jet fighter of the modern era is the F15 with a combat record of 104-0.

            In combat against F15s, the F22 is 41-1.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          It’s not the war, it’s the keeping.

          In any case, we’d probably bog down around the same time China and everyone else on that side got involved. I don’t think it would be as clean or as quick. But, yeah. We could definitely screw them pretty harshly without ever landing troops

          • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            232 years ago

            China and Russia have no military alliance, Xi is just taking advantage of the fantastic business opportunity that opened up for him for cheap Russian imports. If Chinese troops became militarily involved in Russian territory, it would probably be to acquire their claims over eastern Siberia, dating back to the Qing Dynasty. Otherwise he’s just be supporting a state that competes with him for the dominant regional position.

            The Tsar took that land from them, back in the day though. If you look at their current claimed territories, they never forgot. Maybe if Russia agreed to become a subject state of China, then they’d help militarily, but they’re certainly not friends or allies.

            Russia does have actual allies, but not many. And China isn’t one of them.

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            We don’t need to occupy Russia to stop them from continuing a war that they start. We can just destroy their equipment and manufacturing locations so their armed forces surrender.

          • bluGill
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            There isn’t anyone really on that side . China and NATO have differences, but China doesn’t have anything to gain from helping Russia, and nthey lose a lot is NATO loses. They will sit out. Similar with India, they will stay out . Iran or a few other small counties might consider joining, but I doubt it as most are smart enough to know that is suicide.

            • Hank
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Idk, China might see the spread of resources as a good opportunity to try an invasion of Taiwan.

              • bluGill
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                Maybe, Xi seems just sane enough not to try, but who knows. China and Russia can’t really win against NATO though they make things harder. India likely hates China enough to join NATO as well.

                Of course we are talking nuclear armed countries so everyone loses is possible.

              • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Putin made his move because Xi sounded like he was going to go at the same time.

                Xi was closing on HK and planned to switch immediately to Taiwan, even started the domestic pivot, then his navy told him they needed at least 5 years (honestly its more like 15, they are just starting carrier flight ops on the Liaoning and their newer ones aren’t shaken down yet).

                Putin had made his preparations, Xi hinted he might go anyway once the west was distracted.

                If daddy z hadn’t stayed in kyiv history would look really bad right now.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      America is not giving Ukraine the most advanced weapons and that is stopping Russia.

      Imagine if America used their pre advanced weapons.

      It’s posturing. Russia wants to look tough. They’re a paper tiger.

      • uphillbothways
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Total posturing. A few hundred of these would end the war overnight: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

        These aren’t even classified. Poland and Finland have them, today.

        Ukraine is keeping Russia in check with cardboard launched grenades. It’s pretty amazing, honestly; both how innovative Ukraine has been under duress with almost nothing, and how bad Russia has performed in this mess they’ve dumped themselves in.

        A few too many toes over NATO lines would decapitate the Kremlin, probably before anything could be done in response.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I have been highly impressed with the Ukrainian spirit and ingenuity.

          I have also been surprised at what a cluster fuck Russia has been on the battlefield. I expected them to perform better than they did. It shows how much they have declined from being a super power.

          The only issue I have is Russia has nukes and Putin is dumb enough to use them.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    712 years ago

    Good news then: If you go to war with one NATO member you get war with the rest of them absolutely free!

    • @BetaBlake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      For 4 Easy payments of 19.95 you too can get your shit pushed in by 31 different countries, with the added bonus of having someone else raise your children.

    • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      Russia is the irritating kid down the street who just broke his nerf gun so he’s threatening to throw the darts at you instead and tell his mom you’re not invited to his birthday party…

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Maxim Katz has explained that these kinds of deranged declarations are not directed at us. They are a kind of symbolic self-humiliation of Medvedev to prove to Putin that he is still loyal. It’s “look I am willing to appear so wretched and ridiculous to the foreigners, I could not possibly be a threat to you, I am not some kind of alternative that could replace you, I am such a silly man, please don’t throw me out of a window”.

    • @Epilektoi_Hoplitai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Speculation runs that Dimi has been told by the Tsar that if he acts like the tough guy he isn’t with enough bravado, he’ll be allowed to sit in the big boys’ chair and pretend to be president again.

  • @blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    War has fuck-all to do with rights. If you’re going to attack a NATO country we will beat your ass back into the stone age without mercy, your nukes won’t save you if you dare cross that line.

  • Chariotwheel
    link
    fedilink
    312 years ago

    So has Denmark.

    Though it would be funny ig Russia didn’t. Imagine Putin declaring war on Poland and Poland just saying “no, it’s against the law.”

    • Gleddified
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Being invaded? Just say no - they legally cannot take your territory without your consent.

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Poland is chomping at the bit to kick Russian teeth in right now, the first legit opportunity that comes up they’re taking it

  • @Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    I mean… he’s not wrong? They could have a war with NATO any time they wanted it. Russia could have war with NATO whenever they want it. They’ve been very careful to not actually DO that, of course. Last thing they need is to start losing another one with someone who won’t have any difficulty in bringing the full conflict right to them.

  • @Pringles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    Nobody is stopping them from exercising that right against any NATO country. What about Poland? They have been a historical nuisance, Dimi. Just shoot a rocket at a farm somewhere, but make it intentional this time.

    • @lingh0e@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      “Mister Krushchev said, “We will bury you” I don’t subscribe to this point of view It’d be such an ignorant thing to do If the Russians love their children too”

      -Sting

  • @Badass_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    I mean… I can’t see any issue with NATO not stopping Ukraine from invading its own territory… the territory the UN recognizes as part of Ukraine… and which Russia signed three separate treaties promising to respect as part of Ukraine.