• @Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 days ago

    Housing shouldn’t be an investment asset, especially in a for profit system, or you’ll just make BlackRock again.

    • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      I think that’s what s/he was trying to resolve with the doubling of tax on each additional property. It would become cost prohibitive very quickly to have multiple properties.

      • @TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        You would have to close the endless amounts of tax deductions on real estate to make it matter. If they can write off the loss as a business cost than the portfolio will just eat the tax and pass it on to the renters.

    • @TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      It shouldn’t be an investment asset.

      Homebuilding is still a business though. You still need someone to risk their money, assemble the materials and crew, complete the project and find a buyer for it.

      If there’s no demand for a product no one will build it. There’s always going to be demand for a mythical product that can’t be built. Like cheap housing.

      I just spent $2,000 on a handful of wood, shingles, and siding to patch my house up. like 1/10th of a single wide trailer. That’s just the materials i’ll be providing the labor which would normally cost $30-$60 hour.

      So it shouldn’t be an investment asset, someone still has to invest in it being built, so that a homeowner may live there.