The issue isnt how to figure out. The issue is you’re suggesting checking people’s bits, which is patently invasive. Also, most leagues that are inclusive have a surgery requirement. The Olympics for example require you be post op for at least two years, and have hormone levels at a cis womans average. Not one trans woman has even podiumed because were less than a percent of the population, and become the subject of a news frenzy if we try
I’m not qualified to answer that. I assume a doctor might be able to answer.
But not having a dick is a start.
And how would you like these women to prove they don’t have a dick?
Don’t you think they know if they do or don’t?
So this is just a “circle one: do you have a penis Y/N” thing on a form and as long as they choose N, they can be on the women’s team?
Wouldn’t really prove anything, but if they lied there would be evidence? Are you stupid?
The issue isnt how to figure out. The issue is you’re suggesting checking people’s bits, which is patently invasive. Also, most leagues that are inclusive have a surgery requirement. The Olympics for example require you be post op for at least two years, and have hormone levels at a cis womans average. Not one trans woman has even podiumed because were less than a percent of the population, and become the subject of a news frenzy if we try
I’m going to ignore the insult and ask you what evidence there would be.
In your example, there would be evidence that they lied on a form. Obviously anyone can put whatever they want on a form.
Again, what would that evidence be? What sort of evidence?
I think you’re trying to lead into some existential “what even is gendered sex” like its not obvious.
If you’re born with women parts you can be om womens team, or mens team for all i care.
If you’re born with mens parts, you may not compete against those that were born with womens parts.
Anything beyond that would need a doctors expertise.