SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 2 years agoWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?message-square32fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down14
arrow-up132arrow-down1message-squareWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-square@NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink8•2 years agoC’mon dude. As a history teacher, I can tell you that it is definitely possible to fire a gun without arms.
minus-square@HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoI’m not even a gun dude and I’ve heard of those guns that shoot if you look at em funny. Hi points? I don’t remember.
minus-squareTesterJlinkfedilink8•2 years agoJust FYI, factoid has been misused for long enough that it now has an official second, contradictory definition: A briefly stated and usually trivial fact. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/factoid
minus-square@scutiger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•2 years agoA gunman doesn’t cease to be a gunman if he’s disarmed. Though he can’t be a gunman if he wasn’t armed in the first place.
minus-square@MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.calinkfedilink4•2 years agoMost people have at least one arm, so aren’t all gunmen armed?
deleted by creator
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
C’mon dude. As a history teacher, I can tell you that it is definitely possible to fire a gun without arms.
I’m not even a gun dude and I’ve heard of those guns that shoot if you look at em funny. Hi points? I don’t remember.
Just FYI, factoid has been misused for long enough that it now has an official second, contradictory definition:
A briefly stated and usually trivial fact.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/factoid
A gunman doesn’t cease to be a gunman if he’s disarmed. Though he can’t be a gunman if he wasn’t armed in the first place.
Most people have at least one arm, so aren’t all gunmen armed?
Nice.