• @MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    Huh, some commenters raise a good question. What are the non-capitalist countries doing to fight climate change?

    China is building out massive renewables and massive coal.

    My list is short, please add to it.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      What are the non-capitalist countries doing to fight climate change?

      https://electrek.co/2024/07/16/china-on-track-to-reach-clean-energy-targets-six-years-ahead-of-schedule/

      Lots of solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear energy investment in the public sector. Huge investments in mass transit and electric engines. Conversion of old coal powered steel production to electric. Dense urban real estate department. Disposable waste reduction. Big efforts at tree planting along the Gobi Desert.

      They’ve been very “all options on the table” about climate change. Some work. Some don’t. But the progress is undeniable.

    • @ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      “Massive coal” was twenty years ago. India is “massive coal” now.

      They have an electric car that costs $10,000.

      They are quickly switching from Li batteries to Na, which will not require Ni or Co either.

      They have a mixture of capitalism and central planning, so it’s not entirely fair to call them “non-capitalist”.

      • @MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Not far in the past.

        https://www.carbonbrief.org/china-responsible-for-95-of-new-coal-power-construction-in-2023-report-says/

        In China, 47.4GW of coal power capacity came online in 2023, GEM says. This increase accounted for two-thirds of the global rise in operating coal power capacity, which climbed 2% to 2,130GW.

        China’s 70.2GW of new construction getting underway in 2023 represents 19-times more than the rest of the world’s 3.7GW. As the figure below highlights, the country’s trajectory (red line) is diverging significantly from the rest of the world (orange line).

        • @ZMoney@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I was considerably happier before I knew this. Hopefully coal prices will continue to increase, and they won’t end up burning more coal even though their capacity has increased. From what I’ve read, it’s mainly provincial governments trying to boost their economic statistics that are responsible for this building spree.

      • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Run by communists with a majority public sector and control of private enterprise? Hmm. Doesn’t sound correct.

          • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            “Common sense”, aka you don’t know shit about how to define capitalism or about the political economy of China and insist that your poorly developed ideas are self evident.

            • @khaleer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Told person who do not know the difference between authoritarian capitalistic dictatorship and commuism state. Go swallow your copium pills. EDIT: I just lurked into your account, this explains a LOT xD

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                You might want to read the article China Has Billionaires. The economic case for China being Socialist is not unfounded. Nobody believes China has reached full Socialization of the economy, but it is largely Socialized, and appears to be increasingly Socialized as compared to the Dengist period.

              • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Told person who do not know the difference between authoritarian capitalistic dictatorship and commuism state.

                Gonna throw out the word authoritarian because it is an empty signifier.

                If China is a capitalist dictatorship why is the economy mostly publicly owned, with the percentage growing? Why does its government have a 95 percent approval rating according to a Harvard study, and why do innovations in participatory democracy emerge from China?

                I just lurked into your account, this explains a LOT xD

                Wow, what a vile little weirdo treating me being openly trans as some own.

          • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            All capitalism requires a state, the fact that you call an alternate system “state capitalism” just goes to show that you need to do more research on what capitalism is.

            • The Stoned Hacker
              link
              fedilink
              -111 months ago

              According to DuckDuckGo

              State Capitalism: An economic system that is primarily capitalistic but there is some degree of government ownership of the means of production.

              Basically capitalism managed and owned by the state. This is not communism, nor even socialism. China is communist in name only.

              • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                Oh my god I didn’t consider what the brilliant minds of a duck duck go- wait you didn’t even cite where the definition is from?

                Lol