• @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7211 months ago

      It is just incredible to me that we have the ability and knowhow to send instructions to a 40 year old transistor computer to reprogram itself and get it working again with just radio signals.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7311 months ago

        What they did was close to wizardry.

        With no way to fix the chip, the team instead split the code up so it could be stored elsewhere. Initially they focused on reacquiring the engineering data, sending an update to Voyager 1 on 18 April 2024.

        It takes 22.5 hours for a radio signal to travel the 24 billion kilometres (15 billion miles) out to Voyager 1, and the same back, meaning the spacecraft’s operations team didn’t receive a message back until 20 April.

        But when it arrived, they had usable data from Voyager 1 for the first time in five months.

        https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-missions/how-fixed-voyager-1

        • @Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1811 months ago

          Here’s a fun fact that I think of every time I read about light delay.

          We assume the speed of light is the same in all directions but there’s no way to prove that it is.

          It could be light speed is instantaneous in one direction, and half the speed we think it is in the reverse. Any test we could devise depends on information traveling in two directions, nullifying any discrepancies in light speed.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1811 months ago

            The speed of light in a vacuum unaffected by external forces such as gravity should be the same no matter what direction it is in. I’m not sure why it wouldn’t be. That’s like saying a kilometer is longer if you go East than if you go West.

            However, it’s actually far more complicated than that, and much of it beyond my understanding.

            https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html

            That said, direction should not matter.

            • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1211 months ago

              There’s no reason it wouldn’t be. The point is that it’s impossible to prove that it is. There is no conceivable experiment that can be performed to prove the two-way speed of light is symmetric.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                511 months ago

                That’s not how anything works. It’s impossible to prove that the universe wasn’t created last Thursday with everything in place as it is now. There’s no point in assuming anything that can’t be proven has validity.

                • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  511 months ago

                  It’s just a thought exercise. There are several reputable YouTube videos on this topic. None of them claim that the speed of light isn’t the speed of light. They’re just demonstrating that we can’t prove it with current technology. Similar to the difficulty it took to finally prove that one plus one equals two. We know that’s correct, but it took years to prove it.

                • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -111 months ago

                  …but that’s exactly what you’re doing. The fact that light travels at the same speed in all directions cannot be proven. You’re the one insisting that it does.

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    5
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I’m not insisting anything. I’m saying that, based on everything we know, the direction of light has no bearing on its speed.

                    Suggesting that it does just because we don’t have evidence that it doesn’t is no different, as I said, as claiming the universe was created last Thursday.

                    Maybe the speed of light doubles when it goes through the exact right type of orange. You can’t prove it doesn’t.

          • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 months ago

            Another interesting way to conceptualize it is that the speed of light is infinite and it’s causality/information that is limited to c. You shine a light at the moon and it takes 1.3 seconds for the “fact” that the light was turned on to propagate that far.

            • @Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              Cixin Liu imagines exactly that towards the end of the Three Body series. Among other things, which make the series worth absolutely slogging through at points.

      • @ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3611 months ago

        …from 15.2 BILLION miles away.

        And it can reply by basically shining a (very high-frequency) flashlight back at us.

      • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Incredible is the right word, how does this still work after more than 47 years? How do they even still have energy to send and receive signals? That’s one heck of a durable power source. How do the computers and sensors still work? The reliability and durability of these probes is amazing. NASA truly had some reality wizards doing what seems like magic to accomplish this.

        Either that or, aliens have been helping out and repaired it from time to time.

        • @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          How do they even still have energy to send and receive signals? That’s one heck of a durable power source.

          It’s literally decaying plutonium-238. And because it decays, it’s putting out less power than when it started. They’ve shut down certain operations to conserve power, and obviously prioritize things like communication back to earth.

        • @Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          How do they even still have energy to send and receive signals? That’s one heck of a durable power source.

          Nuclear power, it packs a punch!