• @hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve worked at both Facebook and Google, and I’d second this sentiment. It is pretty disgusting that anyone with a passable knowledge of how to hide their tracks can basically get all of the information (messages, posts, photos, private information) they want about you. Sure, they might get fired if they’re caught, and maaaaaaaybe (read: probably not) face legal action, but they can do a lot of damage beforehand. And if they’re good enough, they won’t get caught.

    I trust the people that I worked with there, but these are big organizations, and a lot more people than I would be comfortable with have essentially administrator access to private data.

    • @Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      IMO it’s less about insiders stealing info. I’ve seen leads lists stolen and sold on the open market, etc. What we should really be concerned about is the above board, legal and absolutely promoted evil of advertising. I’ve worked in social Media and gaming(gambling) and let men tell you: the legal things these advertisers do are diabolical. The whiteboard conversations about how to structure a user journey are exploitation and immoral, unethical and downright evil and they are so by design. You’re doing a poor job if you’re not devising ways to skirt the law and use loopholes to manipulate people.

      • @thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Can you say more about those whiteboard conversations? What exactly are they doing that’s unethical? I can speculate about dark patterns related to engagement and spend escalation, but I’m curious to hear your more informed perspective.

        • @Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Youre pretty accurate wrt dark patterns but there’s other stuff like user journeys that map out for instance how much and when to deliver a casino coupon to a user based on research into addictive behavioural patterns.

          Hypothetically: how does the glycemic index of typical lunch foods impact mood and when in that cycle is an addict most likely to succumb?

          Put it like this: if it can be done, it is being done.

          I had a promising career in Datascience very early on (2005 - this was before the CUDA framework was released) and I quickly realised that there was very little good that could come of that work under capitalism. I have friends who had aspirations in aerospace who realised that all they would end up building is weapons. Similar deal. I left it behind and I have a comfortable life in good old fashioned data management now. It isn’t sexy but I can sleep at night.

    • no banana
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m glad I’m chronically uninteresting. If I had literally any information of value I’d be much more careful but now I’m just one of many in a massive crowd of more interesting people.

      I’m still blocking advertisements though. Fuck that shit.

      • @thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean you consume goods and utilize services, so in the context of advertising, yes you are interesting and valuable.

        (Also in the context of being a fellow human being, just so you know ❤️, but that’s a separate topic)

        • no banana
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, I meant more in a nefarious sort of way. Also it was more or less a joke…

    • @pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -161 year ago

      yay! you worked at facebook and google well knowing they exploit people’s emotions and tech illiteracy. Do you want a cookie?

      I hope you’re working at Tiktok now. I can’t wait to praise you about how you tell everyone they’re exploiting teenagers and spying on them that we totally don’t know.  🕵️ 🕵️ 🕵️

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This phrasing may have a chilling effect on discussions on our platform. I believe your opinion could still come through a statement which doesn’t attack the commenter as much - discouraging those who may have future job offers while not scaring commenters off in the future.