Is it an excuse, or an explanation?

I worked with an AS400 while in vehicle logistics, those things are optimized for simple functions but high data throughput

Wtf your username has been popping up in my brain, but i couldn’t quite remember where i read it

Great show, very funny

Sir this isn’t reddit

Embedding the features of one image into another to create an illusion is a task I’d consider AI for, IF the artist performing that task can be propelled by using the output as a base. If it takes far more manual correction by artist to the point that it takes longer to make a finished piece, or if the time spent enjoying the process is diminished, it’s no longer worth it.

AI in art should be about automating the tasks that require scale or repetition, like how 3D graphics took much of the mathematical work from artists, letting them focus on sculpting their forms precisely.

Time freed from automating one task should be spent by the artist on another task, such that the work is done faster AND is appealing in a clear and obvious way.

The most “creative” way I’ve seen this done so far is using separate prompts for different 2d image elements in still painting, which appears to take longer to make less consistent results.

It feels like prompters rely on the divided tastes of the internet to convince people that their art looks good to someone, just not the current viewer.

Image generation is often done remotely, using massive amounts of energy and water cooling. I enjoy the funny images as well, but I don’t like the massive volume of AI images that make it tougher to find human artists.

Machine learning is a net positive for technology and society, IF used wisely. The people who consume art are distressed that they can no longer filter for AI. AI images would be less controversial if we didn’t have so much of it masquerading as human art.

This technology is not the issue, it’s how people use it to the detriment of society and the environment.

Machine learning is a tool amongst many. That being said, most good art requires more than a single tool, tools should be used with care. If you use enough AI that it becomes part of your artistic identity, it’s unlikely that your work will be impactful.

I’m still waiting for someone to make art that requires machine learning and is obviously creative by our standards, instead of using AI to recreate old art. I know it’s possible to use this tool in a way that’s revolutionary, but the users and developers seem to have little interest in pushing art beyond replacing the artists.

I want to see someone develop an original ML model with an original training set that can generate something impossible by any other method. I have a feeling this kind of art would barely reach the mainstream, but it would outlast the slop.

If that dude got proper support, he could have done wonders; he made animated icons for his 16-color assembly-coded OS, and a simple 3d racer! All by himself!

The attention to detail is nice

It’s not a separate issue at all, these people would not be in Panama at all if the US had followed its own laws, and these camps would not exist.

The US is calling the shots, you admitted they might not be following the law, and yet you expect the US to follow the rules they create and break? That’s a very niave outlook on global politics.

They are both places in which the government keeps people, exposed to the elements, only barely meeting their material needs, with the idea that such an arrangement is temporary.

Tell me, what differences between these camps and the Panama ones matter in a practical sense? The side of the border the detanees were born on?

I’m guessing OP means the build quality, as defined by the mechanical and material standards that are needed to recreate the keyboard.

Putting aside the cringe, why is this common amongst specifically boomers? Why are men the ones that enjoy quiet? Was it how boomer men were raised to expect their partner to be, or conditioning from spending all day at their job, likely socializing?

Her accomplishments are erased from public record, making it hard to prove she worked where she worked and affected her career.

Oh haha cause it wouldn’t be recorded

“We have our heading” “Here we goooooooo!”

I’m dying over this

Was just watching this last night