

pretty sure they are options
pretty sure they are options
sorry! i’m new here…
both can be true?
they were trying to get out of the Find Out part of the timeline, i think the suggestion is that we’re in the prequel movie where we are Fucking Around.
has it? source?
sure, you can use a passkey as a primary authentication, but only “a device” or “system”(keypass/1pass etc) knows the passkey detail. with only passkey, if my passkey provider/ device is compromised then everything is lost. having single factor auth seems like a bad idea.
a password is something that I can know, so is still useful as a protection mechanism. having two factor auth should include password and passkey, which seems entirely reasonable whilst also providing an easier path forward for people used to TOTP.
how refreshing :)
“… too much more power than me”
and google isnt? and meta / facebook isnt? etc
<citation needed>
about having salt and vinegar in a food combo
whaaaaa? are you… sure?
good answer :)
its the point where people say “but a sneaky vpn will get around so we may as well do nothing” is equivalent to “my friend can buy me a sneaky drink so we may as well do nothing”… just because you can exploit a law doesn’t make it invalid. enforcement concerns are valid, but it seems reasonable to start with “i agree there is a problem” and go for the 80% rule
nope nope nope.
good commentary, covered a lot of ground - appreciate the effort to write it up :)
if you secure debt against them, they should be taxed?
you need cm level accuracy?
does anyone actually want that? seems beyond the original use case
you think the developers will continue building if nobody gives them money at the end of the build? either through pre- (“give us money and we’ll build you a thing”) or post- (“come give us money for this thing we built”)
why do bakers even charge for the bread they made?!! its just sitting on the shelf doing nothing?!