Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

      • @phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        871 year ago

        But if they force Google to open their app store, I hope that do it for fucking everyone.

        At least on Google devices you still can sideload apps, and fairly easy TBH. My biggest annoyance is the “you can’t buy stuff in apps without giving us a cut” which fucked up stuff like ebook apps etc

        • @Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          371 year ago

          Yeah, the Kindle app pretty blatantly tells you why they removed in-app purchases.

      • Ann Archy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Sir, SIR, we are a nonprofit? Please leave or I will have to launch the facility into iFreespace and stay hovering a foot above ground for the rest of time as per the iNflanational iFukU-nion that is a slight inconvenience for anyone not part of the of the 23.000.001 iToUrPPs living aboard the ilolTax Inflationstate iLevitate CorpoHappytat KZ-23”

    • MrSilkworm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s not an apples to apples comparable situation. Pun intended!

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    731 year ago

    ITT: lots of people wondering why Apple won and Google lost, but not reading the article, which explains the difference of the cases.

      • @bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        381 year ago

        Yeah, fuck that. I definitely don’t agree with the ruling. iOS is far more restrictive than Android, because at least Android provides the ability to easily install alternatives (F-droid app store is an awesome alternative for many types of apps and it’s all free). Sure, Android dominates the market globally, but in the US–nd many other countries-- Apple has the majority of marketshare. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ios-vs-android-market-share-135251641.html

        It’s just bullshit to me that Apple gets a free pass for clearly being anti-competitive. I’m glad this trial struck down Google’s app store monopoly, but all phone OS’s should be forbidden from doing it.

        • @bigFab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Totally agree with your idea, but so you know Apple has lost another legal fight. Europe condemnes it for monopoly of not only App Store, but also Safari and other services. About a month ago.

          • @yamanii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            The browser monopoly really is a stupid thing, what even is the point of installing any other browser if they have to be reskins of safari?

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t, it just says that the case was different and that it wasn’t in front of a jury, it doesn’t give the details of the difference. You have to go read the entire article from a few years ago

  • @candle_lighter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    So odd that the open source platform that allows sideloading and doesn’t even come with an app store by default is the one that is a monopoly but the locked down one with total control over your device is not.

    Some Android flavors even come with other app stores. Samsung phones have their own Samsung app store that even includes Fortnite.

    • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      They do control Play Services, however. That’s not open source and includes proprietary apps basically essential for an operating smart phone such as Google sign in, Maps, and of course the Play Store. Google used their market dominance in those fields to prevent third parties from launching or installing competitors to the Play Store by denying Play Services to those who didn’t comply; paying them off directly or brokering sweetheart deals. That’s appears like an obvious abuse of their market position.

      • @nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        They do control Play Services, however. That’s not open source and includes proprietary apps basically essential for an operating smart phone such as Google sign in, Maps, and of course the Play Store.

        Wtf is this? You do not need google sign in for running a smart phone. Hell, one of the features of stock AOSP Android is being in no way tied to Google.

  • TheMurphy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    I’m pretty sure this has nothing to do with the EU lawsuits, right?

    Both Google and Apple would still have to open up soon (at least in EU)

    Sorry if it’s a stupid question.

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Finally a big W. Google backdoored Android with Google Play Services and gives itself special permissions that no other app can do. They should be under the same limitations that other apps are reserved to. That’s why projects like Sandboxed Google play is really awesome.

  • @localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I run e/OS, I don’t have google app store or any of the related service software installed. Yet I am able to use a cleaned up version of android and still have access to the google app store through an anonymous account using the in built app.

    Epic won this case against google…

    Epic lost the same case against apple, with which none of the above would be possible.

    I’m not advocating for google, obviously I avoid them. But that’s BS, I hope this is used as precedent to bring a new case against apple.

    • @COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Seriously this is crazy. Apple somehow winning is way worse as there is simply no way to install third party apps on IOS. Android makes the risks clear but it’s still at least possible if you click install anyway.

      In terms of being a monopoly, in the US ios has more market share anyway. Google’s lawyers must have really made some big mistake.

  • @SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Epic never sued for monetary damages; it wants the court to tell Google that every app developer has total freedom to introduce its own app stores and its own billing systems on Android

    This seems like a poor choice instead of monetary damages. I have the Epic Games Launcher free game downloader for games I forget I own. I’m very unlikely to start using Epic’s services over Google’s.

    I’d have taken the money and run

    • @nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 year ago

      I think their goal is to let people buy in game currency for fortnight without the play store cut.

      • @SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Ah ok that’s def a good move for them then. That would probably be more than any payout, long-term.

        Hadn’t considered it.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d have taken the money and run

      That would have been penny wise, and pound foolish.

      Sometimes it’s okay to swing for the fences, even if you end up missing, it’s usually worth the try.

    • @Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      This whole thing stinks. It’s the kind of lawsuit where you wish both parties could lose. The whole walled garden concept sucks, but this doesn’t exactly benefit consumers. Nobody wants a dozen different app stores where we need to set up accounts and payment info - not consumers and not small to medium size developers.

      If Epic gets what they’re asking for it sure as hell won’t be what they want. Google still controls the OS so they can just make some shitty third party app store API with requirements just as onerous as IAP that puts everyone else at a disadvantage. If I’m Google, my new motto is “Android’s not done until Fortnite won’t run”.

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    But Epic v. Google turned out to be a very different case. It hinged on secret revenue sharing deals between Google, smartphone makers, and big game developers, ones that Google execs internally believed were designed to keep rival app stores down. It showed that Google was running scared of Epic specifically. And it was all decided by a jury, unlike the Apple ruling.