• @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The website should feed your password straight into a well known hashing algorithm or key derivation function that has undergone a decade or more of careful scrutiny, without any other processing. The output will usually be a fixed length base64 or hex string.

      There’s a short list of about three options that are currently considered acceptable, and a few more are probably fine but are a little too easy to crack these days (e.g. anything that shares the same math as bitcoin… what if someone throws a mining datacentre at your password?)

      If the site breaks, maybe you don’t to be a customer of that service.

      • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        make one account with emoji password to test their system, if it break, good, go create hour account somewhere else

    • Arin
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      auth servers breaking from emojis would be hilarious, pretty sure that’s why older auth servers only allow certain symbols in passwords

    • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      If some auth server breaks because I put emojis in my password then that’s right and deserved

    • 50gp
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      and there are many trash implementations that dont recognise something like :emoticon: as shortcut and turn it into emoji, no no you have to use emoji keyboard to type them

      • Funwayguy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        Hahaha, I wish.

        You would be amazed at how ancient and poorly maintained many web servers are on the modern internet. SQL injection still consistently make the top 3 web app vulnerabilities as of 2021. If that isn’t being sanitized properly I don’t expect emojis would be handled much better.

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        For that particular bug, yes, but there have been many other variations on that theme and not limited to Apple tech. I’ve seen it nuke an email send for example because the SMTP server choked on emojis placed in a subject, to, or from line.

    • MoogleMaestro
      link
      fedilink
      492 years ago

      Security Experts probably don’t log into smart tvs all that often. Just a guess.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          That’s true for all car designers. You’re referring to the shitty designers, though.

          Architects don’t get involved in the actual construction of a building either.

    • @Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      All the apps I’ve used recently use QR codes (or similar measures, like a sync code) that has you log in from the phone, so it should work anyway!

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        But not all apps, sadly, I just experimented it with Crunchyroll, and saw my dad struggling with a crappy app called Vix yesterday.

  • @kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    No. There’s only one piece of advice that should be given to users in 2023 about how to make their passwords stronger:

    Use a password manager

    Just use 32 character random alphanumeric passwords that are unique for each site (you can do more like 12-16 characters if you’ll ever need to enter manually).

    This is it. Stop trying to create clever passwords that you can remember. You aren’t as uniquely creative as you think and there’s been bodies of research into how the various things people do to create passwords that look secure can reduce the generation space so much that they become considerably easier to crack with an intelligent algorithm.

    Test your ability to be unpredictable

    • Lupec
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I love it, Bitwarden has supported generating passphrase style passwords for a while and it’s basically that. It’s my go-to these days.

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Got a source on that?

        Edit: plus brute forcing is just one scenario. I think the xkcd comic refers to using passwords in online services, and those usually have some sort of rate limiting.

    • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I prefer picking a sentence or so that has meaning to me, using the first letters, and then adjusting for numbers/symbols. So if I wanted to make that a pw, it’d be 1ppa505thm2m,utfl,atafn/5. -looks completely unintelligible, but as long as you can remember the sentence and have some ideas of how you would have encoded it, easy enough to remember/recreate.

        • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s as easy to remember a bunch of those as it is remembering 4 random words with no association, I think. And besides, just use that for the big, important, pws like your pw manager.

      • @notapantsday@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        The whole idea is to make it easier for humans to remember and more difficult to brute force. Long passwords are much harder to brute force than complex passwords with lots of special characters. And they’re a lot easier for humans to remember.

        There are enough words in any language that it’s virtually impossible to guess the correct four words, even if they’re in the dictionary.

        • JohnEdwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Even so, most password requirements will force you to add them anyway. Quick way to do it is to just pick a number on a keyboard and add it and the symbol to the end. e.g HorseBattery2# and so on.

          • @Jesus_666@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            And requirements like that are why my password strengths are completely out of whack:

            • Random websites get 24 randomly generated printable characters stored in my password manager. This is essentially unbreakable with conventional methods and can easily be adapted to fit whichever counterproductive rules the website enforces.
            • My password manager and my home computers get memorable but long phrases. A particular favorite is to start in the middle of a line from a song and continue from there. Nobody’s going to guess “make you swear and curse when you′re chewing on” but it’s easy to memorize of you already know the song. Even a dictionary attack is going to have trouble with that many words.
            • My work accounts get the bare minimum that complies with whichever rules the admins came up with. Numbers, special characters and mixed capitalization? No thirty letter phrase for you, then; you’ll get the minimum eight characters so I have a chance of memorizing the thing. Regular password changes? Great, now the last two chargers are going to be incrementing digits, just like for everyone else.

            There’s a reason why experts these days argue against anything but minimum length restrictions.

          • ゴン太
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            You can even make a complete sentence that makes sense with symbols and numbers.

            “Ronaldo doesn’t grill 76 Canadian Tacos.”

            Or whatever

      • @djdadi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Not 4 of them in a row. Keep in mind the attacker doesn’t know " look for exactly 4 words"

        • @Killing_Spark@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          That’s just security by obscurity. It’s one other strategy of choosing passwords that a bruteforce attack is going to try if it gets popular

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    I’d rather staple my forehead to a telephone pole before I ever think about using an emoji in a password. Those things are abominations!

    • @snek_boi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Out of curiosity, what makes you say so?

      Edit: Oh. Did a “Wooosh” happen to me right now? Are you being ironic and referring to the XKCD thing about how to make a secure password using words in phrases?

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        I think OP is conflating the use of emojis in passwords with the use of emojis by the general public.

        Yes, it’s annoying to read stuff like “Hi 😃😃😃😃 I am Bob ♥️♥️♥️😎😎😎😎,” but that doesn’t mean that using them in passwords is a bad idea.

  • Sparking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    Until you get to a prompt that doesn’t support unicode.

  • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    Sounds great where it works but I’m sure most systems would reject an emoji or make you type out some overly complex password in addition to your emoji.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      People who use them tend to spam the hell out of them. Like, 8 of the same emoji. And they use them every other sentence. It’s obnoxious, you only need one or two to get the point across.

    • Polar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Antisocial people.

      It was the same on Reddit. All of the people who despised emojis were often posting in really cringe and incel related subs.

      My use of emojis sky rocketed after I started dating. They are fun and convey emotion really well.

    • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      They didn’t exist yet when I was an early teenager, all we had were emoticons that might be replaced by images by the forum software, so of course I think they’re stupid /s

      Without sarcasm, it is a good thing we have standardized symbols now and don’t have to implement emoticon replacement into forum or chat or social media software. If only because half of such implementations replaced any occurrence of the number 8 followed by a closing parenthesis with 😎 even when that wasn’t the intended meaning (one can think of many other times one would end a parenthetical statement with the number 8).

  • Cosmo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As a software developer who has worked with a lot of symbols and emoji… PLEASE DON’T DO THIS.

    Software doesn’t all handle these symbols the same way, and without tech knowledge (or even with) , it’s very possible to not be able to log in easily. I’m kinda drunk rn, but I’ll try to explain as simply as I can…

    For example… skintone emojis are actually two characters, a face and a skin tone modifier. I think those ones are always two characters but some of these “multi-char” characters can be normalized into a single character. But not everyone handles this the same way. For example, Safari might normalize the emoji, but Firefox might treat it as two separate characters… And this would probably make your password not match. But basically… text has lots of edge cases; I’d advise to use normal passwords please (also maybe a password manager)

    • @banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Was gonna say… you’re relying on the consistency of external emoji handlers that you don’t control. Ascii emojis are one thing.

      • Cosmo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Is my explaintion ok? The hard kombucha was… harder than I anticipated

        • @banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          It was pretty normal lol. Basically everything between the visual of an emoji and what “text” is entered is not in your control. So it’s great for security but not in practice as a password. What brand was the kombucha I want some.

          • Cosmo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            I didn’t realize NYC has a physical Juneshine location. So I got a flight… and a Juneshine cocktail…