• @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1942 years ago

    As a reminder, Brave was created by the guy who brought you JavaScript and was later fired from Mozilla for donating to hate groups. Brave also profits from multiple forms of fraud including NFTs and affiliate hijacking.

    • Ian@Cambio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -392 years ago

      This is misleading. The BAT was a reasonable idea not really a scam.

      • @fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s not just BAT; Brave also supports NFTs, which are even more unambiguously a scam.

        The company is in bed with the cryptocurrency “industry” which cannot exist without constant fraud, ransomware, and other crimes.

  • Pxtl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    Uh I’ll stick to Firefox thanks.

  • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    Just a reminder, Brave was using people’s likenesses to solicit donations without their consent, and without necessarily give those people the donations.

  • @Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Damn the negative stories just keep coming in regards to Brave. It’s a shame, I liked using their iOS app but I said fuck it awhile ago already. Firefox is my main b rowser

    • @LukeMedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’m still not sure what to use on my iPad for adblocking. Someone please tell me what to use instead on iPad! Everything else is Firefox + uBlock Origin, of course.

      • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Apple makes it quite difficult. Honestly, I don’t think there’s a good option. Maybe try DNS based adblocking, by either setting your DNS to one that blocks ads or by setting up a Pihole, which gives you more control.

  • @Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    Stop using Brave, jfc. Please use Firefox, it’s not the best, but it’s better than this trash my goodness how many more scandals do people need to get rid of this crap?

    • @phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Yeah the first time I tried Brave it the a bunch of ads for their services - and asking about providing info to their partners - at me constantly. I don’t understand why people use that PoS

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    the brave experience was less than ideal for me, the brave search is unusable, i switched back to firefox, which i had moved to from chrome

    also, related, but a side note, word to the wise, never ever ever use a free vpn ever, someones gotta foot the bill for the exit server bandwidth, and either they’re keeping logs or they’re not keeping logs, but you’ll never know, and you won’t know when they sell their settup to the next guy. always use a major vpn service who’s audited and shown proof they’re not keeping logs, they’re in the business of secure and private vpn service. free vpns like what brave are offering are not in that business, and server, rack space, bandwidth costs actual money

  • @notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    The only chrome variant that doesn’t seem sketchy to install is chromium. The built from open source chromium. And that’s just because some sites barely function unless you’re using chrome’s rendering.

    For everything else, Firefox.

      • @notannpc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I don’t know that I’d call that a chromium browser but I’ve only looked at its docs for 10 minutes. Hard to say where chromium integration begins and ends there without digging into the code. Seems like, at most, it’s using the web rendering engine from the chromium project. But it also seems to suggest it has its own modules for executing/rendering js/css/html.

        Probably not included in the “should be avoided” category.

        Now I’m curious what it’s used for.

        • @pastermil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I’m currently using it in a browser called Falkon. It’s not as big as Firefox or Chrome, but it is endorsed by KDE. Also, Apple’s Safari is using something similar.

          • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Not at all.

            Safari is using WebKit, which they based on KDE’s old KHTML engine, which is now discontinued.

            Falkon uses qtwebengine which is Chromium’s web engine + integration with QT user interface.

            A Linux browser that uses WebKit (like Safari) is GNOME Web.

    • ripcord
      link
      fedilink
      312 years ago

      Very few people do. Better to just get Firefox.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Or some variant of it as Firefox also has its owned bundled stuff; I recommend Waterfox

  • sebinspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    The amount of people I see shilling for Brave like it’s God’s gift to privacy is frankly kind of disturbing given how many issues they’ve had with privacy

  • Engywook
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -54
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The usual anti-Brave hate wagon, with FUD and pitchforks. They’re already working on it:

    https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/33726

    VPN is a paid service, it doesn’t connect to anywhere if one doesn’t pay. This is just a service installed just in case. And complaining about this while using Windows , the OS with unavoidable telemetry, spyware and ads is just laughable.

    Mozilla did far worse “mistakes” over the time (Pocket , Cliqz, Mr. Robot, deal with the worst privacy offenders on the Earth such as Google Facebook, Amazon, CEO pay rise while firing devs and losing market share, while begging for donations… and so on) but they somehow always get a free pass, with people swallowing Mozilla’s corpo PR every single time.

    • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Mozilla have some immunity because they do the hard work and actually develop a browser, while for Brave everything that matters is leeched from Google’s Chromium.

        • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think you meant Brave is a scam here.

          I mean, it’s not like Mozilla runs their own crypto wallet with the browsers keeping a mayor cut for themselves only because they are distributing the browser.

          Mozilla does not run a crypto based ad network and inserts it into webpages.

          Mozilla has never been caught inserting their own affiliated links into crypto related websites to receive a cut.

          So you probably misplaced Mozilla with Brave there.

          Sure, Mozilla is not perfect and they deserve criticism when they do things wrong (and they tend to). But Brave is just a chromium skin + a crypto based scam built-in.

    • @Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Mozilla isn’t some paragon of free open source non-profit charity like everyone is claiming, they need to make a profit just like everyone else to keep themselves up there as a competitor to Google. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation

      Currently use Firefox and Brave for different applications but I am considering switching to Vivaldi, I definitely want to do more research on all of them though.

      • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I’m no fan of either Mozilla, Brave or Vivaldi.

        Each of them is trying to make a cut with the browser.

        I’d advise against Vivaldi because they have telemetry and it’s proprietary.

        What I suggest instead are free software, community managed projects that have no monetary interests in distributing the browsers: Librewolf and Ungoogled Chromium. Unlike Brave, Vivaldi or even Mozilla, these devs don’t have incentives to put anti features into their browsers.