If you have the Brave Browser installed on your Windows devices, then you may also have Brave VPN services installed on the machine. Brave installs these services without user consent on Windows devices.

Brave Firewall + VPN is an extra service that Brave users may subscribe to for a monthly fee. Launched in mid-2022, it is a cooperation between Brave Software, maker of Brave Browser, and Guardian, the company that operates the VPN and the firewall solution. The firewall and VPN solution is available for $9.99 per month.

  • @9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    702 years ago

    Brave, owned by Brendan Eich who has donated to homophobic charities and whose browser promotes a load of crypto bro shit on the new tab page.

    Unironically, using straight up Google Chrome is better IMO

    • @HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Why is a server in Washington DC not safe and secure? I’ll give you private against government snooping it’s not, but it can still be safe and secure.

        • @HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          But it isn’t the entire point tho, I use it when connected to public wifi networks to keep my connection secure. Sure, not letting your local ISP spy on you and report it to the gov is one but not the entire point.

  • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    And spyware for free, and I would not be surprised if they included an insecure backdoor at no extra cost.

      • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Both shitty, yes, but an unsecure backdoor is opening the door to every hacker on the planet, not just one group.

        • @SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I was disagreeing that a backdoor can ever be secure, because by definition it’s a way to bypass security protocols and if one person can bypass them, there’s no guarantee others can’t too.

          • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Of course, no backdoor is secure, but among them, there are the just plain bad and the even worse.

  • donkeystomple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Well I feel better about making the switch to Firefox now, and doing a custom user.js

    • chris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I’ve posted a similar question to asklemmy but more over the focus on preference than privacy. In short the search engine Kagi is really good, Brave search was what I had used for a while. I think search engine choice is a case by case kinda thing, each person uses what they like. There are some other engines I forgot from my post which are more privacy centered.

        • chris
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Yes it is 10 dollars a month, but you can create an account and try it for free to see if it is for you. It also does not use your data nor push advertisements which explains the cost.

          • 👁️👄👁️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            ddg does that for free

            $10/mo is also crazy overpriced for a search engine, they’re really not resource intensive at all

            • @SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              ddg relies on Bing so it isn’t really comparable, idk about kagi’s costs but they claim 1.2 cent per search and an average of 700 searches per month (as what they are serving and hence pricing for)

    • Kras Mazov
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I use Brave Search on Firefox, but I mostly use the shortcuts it provides like !yt and !g. A few months back I mostly used it over google, but the search results more times than not have been worse in comparison for me.

        • Kras Mazov
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Oh, thanks I forgot it was called bangs. I used DDG a few years ago but missed some features from Google, so I ended up giving up on it, maybe I’ll try again soon.

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    -82 years ago

    u/@Max_P said this at the !technology thread:

    Software installs services to make its features operate, including optional default off ones. More news at 10.

    This is just like any other optional feature of Chromium you don’t use

  • @ser@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -122 years ago

    Check out thorium.rocks It is a fork of Chromium with performance and security improvement. Chris Titus recommends it.

  • @hottari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -172 years ago

    I don’t use Windows but if you install a program that requires a service on Linux, the service will be written to your system’s services daemon awaiting your activation. I don’t see what the issue with that is.

    • @citytree@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What’s to stop the installer on Linux from configuring the service such that the service always runs on boot? e.g. systemctl enable malware.service.

      • @hottari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You still need to manually enable the service. The configuration of the service has zero effect on its activation or lifecycle.