President Joe Biden was asked by a reporter in Israel on Wednesday what made him confident that the Israelis weren’t behind the explosion that killed hundreds at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday.

Biden responded that it was “the data I was shown by my Defense Department.”

Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded the Gaza hospital blast was likely caused by an errant Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket that fell short of its target.

  • @Daiken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    732 years ago

    The problem I have with this narrative isn’t who dropped the bomb. Tbh they’re probably right it was a Palestinian missile. It’s the sheer audacity for all these western countries to be shocked and say let’s figure this out, as Israel just dropped like 6000 bombs in 6 days. They’re worried about one bomb but not the 6000 others, cause ya know, those were killing only Hamas and not injured people in a hospital /s.

    While the Muslim world looks on in horror at more bombing in a conflict that has been going on for decades, the western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people. Only the US can pressure Israel to accept a two state solution. That’s the only peaceful solution possible for this conflict imo. The other solution is to wipe out Gaza and the West Bank and everyday we’re getting closer to that.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      The western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people

      Misinformation on the scale of “a building was destroyed that clearly is still intact” deserves focus. If they’ll lie about shit that can be confirmed with a tiny bit of research, what else is getting exaggerated?

    • @feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t know, most of the papers in the UK led with a front page item on how Israel had killed 500 people by bombing a hospital. So if that wasn’t actually true, it’s quite important.

      • @frederick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        I doubt that Rishi Sunak speak correctly.

        This is the most global headline nơw.

        If you have a little deep heart inside, you can think twice. See what difference between two sides. Who is support Israel, the world’s most powerful militaries that every country don’t want take risk to war with. Then, who is support Palestine. There is many country but still behind.

        The latest statistics on the Israel-Palestine conflict as of October 19, 2023, are as follows:

        Gaza: Killed: At least 3,478 Injured: Over 12,065 Occupied West Bank: Killed: At least 69 Injured: More than 1,300 Israel: Killed: At least 1,403 Injured: At least 3,800

        These figures have been reported by the Palestinian health ministry, Palestine Red Crescent Society, and Israeli Medical Services. Please note that these numbers are subject to change as the situation evolves.

        And what the trembling moments 1 child killed in Gaza every hour. Precisely more than that. 😥

        When 12 of The Council drafted a statement calling for a ceasefire on Wednesday, but the statement was vetoed by the US. WHAT THE F***

        Millions of lives hang in the balance, including the 2.3 million civilians half of whom are children in Gaza civilians in Israel, and Jews and Muslims around the world.

        I can write more but let just world knows who is the really war criminal.

        You don’t have to be Muslim to support Palestine 🇵🇸 … you just have to be HUMAN … 😥

        • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          what can third parties do to reduce or eliminate Hamas’s hold on Palestine?

          I’m all for Palestinian rights, and the constant encroachment of fundamentalist settlements is a war crime that went unpunished for Israel - but Hamas’s charter is explicit, there’s no middle ground or two state solution, just the destruction of Israel.

          So how can third parties help the Palestinians in the one way that would make a significant difference in their QOL and interactions with Israel?

          Honest question.

          • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -32 years ago

            You’re not going to get any magical solution because Israel is a country founded on stolen land by entitled religious extremists. People always leave that part out when they talk about this situation.

            • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              You’re not going to get any magical solution

              and yet they all believe in their invisible friends and holy books so much… ironic that.

              Israel is a country founded on stolen land by entitled religious extremists. People always leave that part out when they talk about this situation.

              funny how you’re leaving out the near extermination of their people and world recognition of their state, kinda glossing over most of history even. guess you decided to leave those parts out too. It’s almost as if both sides are completely full of shit.

              Huh.

    • @ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      A two-state-solution doesn’t work in part because extremist Muslim groups want the are to be purely Muslim. They would continue to attack Israel with terror tactics, Like they did from the start. What is your solution to that?

      • @Pogbom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        Swap Muslim with Jewish and Israel with Palestine and it’s the same problem… to be clear I think both are true but it’s kinda weird to single one out.

        • @ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          I single them out because the extremist Muslim groups on Palestinian side have openly admitted, repeatedly, that the goal ist to exterminate all Jews from the area and make it a pure Muslim country.

          If you have some sources that show the same was said from Israeli side about Palestine, please show me. Because what I see in this conflict is not as simple as people like to make it out to be. It’s not just evil colonizers trying to snag land from a victim country that wants a two-state-solution.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Yeah, the people of Palestine haven’t exactly been pushing for a two state solution and they back/vote in groups that want to exterminate the jews and enforce Sharia law wherever they can.

            Even if Israel wanted a two state solution they’re not going to get it. Not until Palestinians can come up with a functional government that isn’t made up of a group that has genocide as one of their stated political goals.

            And I mean actual genocide, the attempt to end a genetic lineage through violence, not the “genocide” of lemmy which essentially just means “cultural disruption/assimilation”, a widening of definition that allows them to pretend that it’s equal on both sides cause “they’re both committing genocide!”

            • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              72 years ago

              Sorry man, it’s not a “Lemmy” definition, that’s literally a type of genocide as defined by the UN.

              • Spzi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Yes, the definition is vague: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

                genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

                • Killing members of the group;
                • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
                • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
                • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
                • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

                It hinges on “intent”, which needs to be inferred and interpreted. It includes terms like “in whole or in part”, and does not specify how many “members of the group” are the lower limit.

                However, the main point of R0cket_M00se still stands. There is a significant width in the spectrum of acts and intents which can be classified as genocide, with Hamas proudly on the upper end.

              • R0cket_M00se
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                If the word you choose to describe forced cultural assimilation and mass slaughter for the intended purpose of annihilating an entire group of people based on their race are the same, your definition is useless.

                That’s like calling a playground fight between kids attempted murder, it makes the word worthless when you water it down to mean any violence at all.

            • @sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              It’s kind of funny to me listening to people who advocate for separate states. I mean, sure, do it. But don’t expect that to stop religious zealots from firing peace rockets at each other.

              • R0cket_M00se
                link
                fedilink
                English
                52 years ago

                It won’t stop anything, a two state solution is a joke.

                The best case scenario now is for Palestinians to assimilate into other Muslim countries, it’s not ideal but it’s probably the way fewest people will die.

          • @Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -42 years ago

            So not a defense of Hamas but because you ask. Here are a few news articles demonstrating genocidal action by Israeli government or calls for genocide by political/religious leaders in Israel. In addition there was a real chance of a two state solution with the Olso Accords but they were never completed with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 by hard right Israelis opsed to any peace agreement.

            I am sure that there are plenty more examples, they tend to just be not as widely reported. Also because someone is going to say something. Both the wide spread killing or the wide spread displacement of the group of people is genocide.

            https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14836.doc.htm

            https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-60197918

            https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/concentrate-and-exterminate-israel-parliament-deputy-speakers-gaza-genocide-plan

            The Facebook post from the article with with translation below(Google translate)

            https://www.facebook.com/MFeiglin/posts/695450140534104

            in her in honor of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Mr. Prime Minister It has just become known that Hamas took advantage of the ceasefire to kidnap an officer. It turns out that this sale is not going to end so soon. The failures of the operation were inherent in it from the beginning because: A - He does not have a correct and clear goal. B - There is no proper moral envelope that supports our soldiers. What is required now is to realize that Oslo is over, that this is our country - only our country, including Gaza! There are no two countries and no two peoples - there is only one country for one people. As a result of this internalization, a deep and fundamental strategic change is required - both in the definition of the enemy, both in the definition of the mission, both in the definition of the strategic target and of course - in the definition of the correct and necessary fighting ethics. 1 - Defining the enemy The strategic enemy is radical Arab Islam in all its metastases from Iran to Gaza, which seeks to eliminate all of Israel. The enemy in sight is Hamas. (Not the tunnels, not the rockets - Hamas) 2 - Defining the task: The occupation of the entire strip and the elimination of all the fighting forces and their supporters. 3 - Defining the strategic goal: turn Gaza into Jaffa. A flourishing Israeli city with a minimum of hostile citizens. 4 - Definition of fighting ethics: “Woe to the wicked and woe to his neighbor” In light of these four points, Israel must immediately carry out the following actions: A - The IDF will define open areas on the Sinai border and close to the sea where the civilian population will be concentrated - away from the built-up area and the launch and tunnel areas. Tent camps will be set up in these areas until relevant immigration targets are located. The supply of electricity and water to areas that were inhabited will be cut off. B - The areas that were populated will be bombarded with maximum firepower. All civilian and military Hamas facilities, means of communication and logistics - will be completely destroyed. C - The IDF will cut the strip lengthwise and wide, greatly expand the axes, take control of controlled areas and destroy the nests of resistance if any remain. D - Israel will begin locating countries and immigration quotas for Gaza refugees. Those interested in immigrating will receive a generous financial aid package and will arrive in the receiving countries with significant financial capacity. E - Those who insist on staying and prove that they have no connection to Hamas, will be required to publicly sign a declaration of loyalty to Israel and will receive a blue identity card similar to that of East Jerusalem Arabs. And - with the end of the fighting, the Israeli law will be applied in the entire strip, the deportees of Gush Katif will be invited to return to their settlements and the city of Gaza and its daughters will be built as Israeli tourist and commercial cities for all intents and purposes. Mr. Prime Minister! This is a moment of fateful decision in the days of the State of Israel. All enemy factions, from Iran and Hezbollah to Daesh and the Muslim Brotherhood - are now rubbing their hands with pleasure and preparing themselves for the next round. I warn you that any result that is less than what is defined here means encouraging the continuation of the offensive against Israel. Only if Hezbollah understands how Hamas was treated in the south, will it refrain from launching its 100,000 missiles - from the north. I urge you to adopt the strategy suggested here. I have no doubt that like me, the entire nation of Israel will overwhelmingly stand to your right - if you only dare. With great respect and appreciation Moshe Feigli

            • @ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Did you read those articles? The first two don’t address or hint at genocidal plans from Israel against the ethnic group “Palestinian” at all. The third article is about one (!) extremist politician who’s party didn’t even get into the parliament because they didn’t have enough votes. That actually goes against your notion that Israels goal is a genocide against Palestinians.

              This is not about disputing war crimes from Israel. It’s specifically about the question whether or not Israel wants an ethnical cleansing on Palestinians. And that this is the reason for the actions from their side.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        There isn’t a solution and just to be clear proto Israelis take part in a civilian bombing campaign inside of mandatory Palestine because they also do not believe any other religion should exist.

        If you’re going to paint a picture don’t just throw shade at one when both deserve it.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        It’s almost like they went through two attempts to end their people in a twenty-ish year period of time.

    • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Part of the problem is that Hamas won’t accept a two state solution, either. The people in power on both sides have made it clear that they want the other eradicated. If Hamas and the Israeli government were to disappear then maybe that could happen, but even then there is so much deep rooted hatred amongst those populations for them to realistically live in relative peace while being in such close proximity to each other.

      I don’t honestly know of a great solution besides Israel replacing their government, and the ultra nationalistic conservative half of the Gaza strip moving out, or vice versa.

    • @ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I like your take. Most actors involved in this conflict have tunnel vision and that will only lead to more violence.

      Even some victims of Hamas’ violence are calling on TV for reflection instead of seeking revenge. Revenge only feeds a never-ending cycle of violence with no end in sight. Israel’s Government will have to own up to having allowed/encouraged Hamas with the single purpose of derailing two-state efforts and that has failed horribly.

      • @iegod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        It really doesn’t matter what you call them or how you feel about it, Israel is in the position to call the shots and the US is their most influential ally on this. Israel isn’t going to magically go the peaceful route without external pressure, and you have to be fucking joking to think they care what Palestinians care.

      • silly goose meekah
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        what makes you think anything would change if nobody did anything? of course there needs to be an external pressure to change something about the situation. otherwise israel will just keep on decimating palestine population and it will end with a singular state. is that what you want?

        • @nephs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I added an Al Jazeera video argument of a single state. It is not a defense of the zionist fundamentalist terrorists state.

          It’s a defense of a multi ethnic state, run by the people for the people.

          If nobody did anything maybe in 50 years the social indexes may improve by collective work of the people that live there, and know the right priorities, like Vietnam is recovering after the US simply stopped bombing the shit out of that land.

    • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Both of those estimates come from Hamas sources (well the 1000 people one IDK where you got that from).

      JFC people you can criticize Israel without gobbling up a terrorist organization’s fat propaganda dick. For now we just have no way to know how many people died in that hospital. Find another war crime to criticize Israel for, they’re not that hard to come by.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Yeah if they’d said a dozen people died I’d believe it. That crater looked like a stick of TNT went up, not a 2000 pound bomb.

          If it has exploded directly overhead in the center of 500 people packed like sardines I don’t think it could have killed more than a couple dozen.

        • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ooh gotcha. Unfortunately I’ve read some wild conspiracy theories about this in the last few days so I immediately thought this was more of the same… sorry lol

        • @blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah, the hospital wasn’t filled with civilians hurt/running away from bombings after Israel told them to run away because they’re gonna bomb them again.

          No way it would have had +500 humans in there.

            • @blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -12 years ago

              The parking loot is a part of the hospital.

              Does it seem out of this world to you that there would be +500 humans in the parking lot of a hospital in a crisis like this?

              • Spzi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                52 years ago

                Yes, that might be the case under the current circumstances. The above picture helped to imagine what 500 people look like crammed squarely in a space. I doubt the 500 hypothetical people resting in the parking lot were placed more tightly than that.

                Next, look at pictures of the detonation crater, which has the size of a sewer manhole. Imagine that explosion going off in the middle of the audience of 500 people. Would they all die from that? The sheer amount of body mass and flesh would shield the people in rows 20+ from the explosion.

                I bet you couldn’t kill 500 people with whatever exploded there, if you tied them directly onto the bomb, or rocket, or whatever. Is there any precedent of a terrorist attack or military strike or anything which killed that many people with a similarly small explosion?

                • @blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  You can’t imagine people running away from being bombed being more tightly packed than people attending a conference?

                • @blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  You have never seen a parking lot as big as the conference in your image?

                  You can’t possibly imaging 500 hundred humans running from being bombed staying together in a parking lot of a hospital that is smaller than the conference in your images? You can’t imagine that at all?

  • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago
    1. He was asked on the street by a random reporter.

    2. His quote includes “likely”

    3. For the last couple years Bidens off the cuff remarks haven’t exactly been reliable.

    Yet people are treating this as an official stance of the US Government…

    • @vertigo3pc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      “Iraq has WMD’s” is a similar statement, backed by an entire administration, that also led to unnecessary deaths.

      Its a political statement, because if Israel did attack the hospital, then that’s another outright war crime right after Israel was threatened by Jordan, Lebanon, and Iran.

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      262 years ago

      Uh, did you miss this part?

      Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded

      • @gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Wow shocker the pentagon is defending its close partner in the war. Ill beleive them when they actually release evidence not just “The pentagon said so.”

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        The embedded tweet:

        While we continue to collect information, our current assessment, based on analysis of overhead imagery, intercepts and open source information, is that Israel is not responsible for the explosion at the hospital in Gaza yesterday.

        So the investigation isn’t concluded, there might not have even been an official investigation, and all they’re saying is Israel “isn’t responsible”.

        None of what OPs headline claims.

        • iAmTheTot
          link
          fedilink
          142 years ago

          That’s a tweet from the white house national security council. That’s completely independent of the article’s claim that two pentagon officials gave them info.

          • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -142 years ago

            So those two officials haven’t officially said it…

            And even if they did say it to journalists, there’s nothing to back it up?

            • iAmTheTot
              link
              fedilink
              132 years ago

              What exactly are you trying to get at? I’ve literally rebuked every claim you’ve made, but your stance just seems to boil down to “they are lying.”

              • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -122 years ago

                I’ve literally rebuked every claim you’ve made

                Many antivaxers and trump supporters have thought the same thing…

    • @Stamau123@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago
      1. He was asked on the street by a random reporter.

      Out of anything this is the strangest complaint. Why wouldn’t he answer a street reporter?

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -282 years ago

        Because Biden’s biggest fans have spent years defending his misspeaking by saying his stutter makes him get words mixed up when he’s randomly asked questions…

        So when he’s stopped to get asked a random question, we need to wait a day or two to see if that’s what he really meant to say, or if his stutter made him somehow say the wrong words again.

        • @NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          If the administration comes out with a revision or clarified updated statement then I’ll likely accept that too. For now, words out of the presidents literal mouth are as much of an official statement that I need.

              • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -32 years ago

                For now, words out of the presidents literal mouth are as much of an official statement that I need.

                The most recent seven…

                I didn’t think I needed to specify that

                • @NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  102 years ago

                  Admittedly Biden is old and boring and sometimes confusing. Trump was a gaslighter whose words also represented the office, but that I couldn’t trust.

                  I don’t have to wake up worrying about some dangerous shit that Biden tweeted though. I’ll take this any day of the week.

  • halfempty
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    I don’t consider the Pentagon to be a reliable source for information when they have a vested interest in the conflict. Remember when they said Saddam Hussain had “weapons of mass destruction” which was used to justify the Iraq invasion? Well there never were any. The Pentagon manufactured that disinformation, and media parroted it like loyal puppets.

    • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Yeah why are people believing this? I’m sure someone will quietly peddle it back just like they did with the “40 beheaded babies” lie. This is blatant information warfare.

      • halfempty
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        The US State Department has a long-standing strong alliance with the Israelis. Billions of dollars of weaponry is sold to the Israeli military yearly, with a direct profit for the US defense industry.

        • @rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Israeli airstrikes killing civilians hasn’t stopped weapon sales before, so why would the pentagon lie about this one instance?

      • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        Same as any other conflict… maintain the interests of US govt. and by extension rich oligarchs who have the house and Senate in their pockets.

    • Karyoplasma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Nah, fuck both is enough. I will never support jihadists and I will never support apartheid states.

  • @nephs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    Pentagon. The security agency of the country vetoing ceasefire agreement in the UN security council, in favour of Israel attacks.

    Independently of whom, exactly?

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      It is a different group. How much they align with each other and/or cooperate, I do not know.

  • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    The video seems pretty clear tbh. An aircraft dropping bombs would be quite loud, and a missile would be visible.

    • @eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I haven’t seen anything personally convincing, there’s a photo of a pothole that’s supposed to prove something I guess?

      And the US government has a long and costly history of making up accusations against Arab Muslims.

      • @Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I’m not sure if you’ve seen the videos released by IDF of them bombing Gaza, but those bombs literally bring down entire buildings. They’re massive. If one like that fell on the hospital parking lot there would be a huge hole in the ground and the buildings around would be obliterated. Also if it was JDAM it would not have hit the parking lot unless for some reason that’s what they were targeting. It’s a guided bomb unlike the unguided rockets Hamas is using. JDAMs are accurate to 10 meters or so.

  • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Ah, if the CIA says it’s true, I’m sure they’re neutral and definitely not trying to push an agenda. The CIA famously never lies about the military capabilities of organisations against US interests.

    Seriously, you all fucking believe this? Shame on you all for your lack of pattern recognition skills.

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    i believe Hamas would do it on purpose just to make Israel look bad… it probably wasn’t even a mistake… i mean, they use their own people as meat shields all the time, it wouldn’t be a surprise if they bombed their own kids…