A very NSFW website called Pornpen.ai is churning out an endless stream of graphic, AI-generated porn. We have mixed feelings.

  • @Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    672 years ago

    Could be interesting. I mean for one thing no real person being expolited and those with strange fetishist can be satisfied. But could be very disturbing as well. Wonder how long until AI video porn?

    • guyrocket
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think it is just a matter of time for the disturbing stuff to circulate. If people can create their darkest desires they will.

      Then cue debates and political campaigns about AI in general and if we should allow anyone or anything to create depraved images, pronographic or not.

      • gullible
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        That’s so good, sissy. You got even better after I amputated your legs.

        “We don’t intend to police the use of developing technologies at this time.”

        That’s so good, sissy, blind that billionaire with your acidic piss.

        “We cannot allow our children to be exposed to such grotesque videos.”

      • @Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Yeah, although I think part of the missing nuance is that people already did that, the difference being that now anyone can, in theory, create what’s inside their head, regardless of their actual artistic talent. Now that creation is accessible though, everyone’s having another moral panic over what should be acceptable for people to create.

        If anything, moving the more disturbing stuff from the real world to the digital seems like an absolute win. But I suppose there will always be the argument, much like video games making people violent, that digital content will become real.

      • @shortly2139@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        People have been able to draw for eons. Imagine trying to ban the public from drawing because the odd few people are a little mixed up.

        AI is just a tool, like the pencil, charcoal or paints.

        I know you aren’t suggesting we ban it from the public, just my side of the hypothetical debate that your right in saying will arrive

  • @funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    612 years ago

    “eh I’ll take a look”

    first thing I see is a woman on her back with her legs behind her head, smooth skin where her genitals should be and nipples in the middle of her buttocks.

    “alright then”

  • @sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    People who insist on real flesh porn will ultimately be viewed as weirdo’s out of touch with reality like people who insist everything sounds better on vinyl.

    Fast forward 25 years past the first Ai war and a ragged but triumphant humanity must rediscover the lost art of waxing.

    • @Harpsist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Why would I want to encourage the flesh trade where real women are hurt? And are limited to what humans are physically capable of?

      When I can have AI generated people who are able to do anything imaginable and no one gets hurt?

      They’ll be arguments that ‘once people get used to the fantasies they’ll want to try it in real life’ but we all know that that just isn’t true fr 40 years of video games. There hasn’t been any uptick in the events of people eating mushrooms and jumping on turtles or - what ever the fuck a goomba is -

  • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    At what point was porn NOT graphic, but now this thing IS GRAPHIC. Are we talking all caps, or just a small difference between the live stuff and the AI shit? Inquiring minds want to know.

  • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    “Are we ready”, in the sense that for now it’s 95% garbage and 5% completely generic but passable looking stuff? Eh.

    But, as this will increase in quality, the answer would be… who cares. It would suffer from the same major issues of large models : sourcing data, and how we decide the rights of the output. As for it being porn… maybe there’s no point in focusing on that specific issue.

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Does it say something about society that our automatons are better at creating similated genitals than they are at hands?

    • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It says that we are biologically predisposed to sex, which we are, like animals, which we are.

      It doesn’t say anything about society, it just confirms the human condition.

    • @lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They suck quite a lot at genitals too. But what makes hands especially tricky is simply that they are pretty damn complex. A hand has five fingers that can all move independently, the hand can rotate in all kinds of way and the individual parts of a hand can all occlude each other. There is a lot of stuff you have to get right to produce a good looking hand and it is especially difficult when you are just a simple 2D algorithm that has little idea of 3D structure or motion.

    • @Bop@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      On a visual level, we are more interested in genitals than hands? Also, faces.

  • @randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    When I first heard Stable Diffusion was going open source, I knew this would happen. The only thing I’m surprised at is that it took almost 2 years.

    • @lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      It went quite a bit faster than that. StableDiffusion has only been out for about 13 months and this started about three months after that with Unstable Diffusion. What this article is reporting on is already quite a few months old and quite a bit behind what you can do with a local install of StableDiffusion/Automatic1111/ControlNet/etc. (see CivitAI).

  • @RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    Meh. It’s all only women and so samey samey. Not sexy IMO, but I don’t think fake is necessarily not hot, art can be, certainly.

    • @Zerfallen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      You can change it to men, but most of the results are intersex(?) or outright women anyway. I guess the training data is heavily weighted toward examples of women.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Some things I was able to put my finger on after looking at a bunch of the images in the feed:

      • It doesn’t do skin well, treating it more like a smooth plastic than a surface with pores, wrinkles, and fine hairs.
      • It doesn’t understand lighting, so shadows don’t agree with highlights or even each other.
      • It doesn’t understand anatomy. A lot of the images were fine in this regard but others had misplaced muscles, bones, and impossible limb positioning/truncation.
      • It has no idea how to draw vaginas. Nipples are also not well understood, though it does better on average with those. They still look more like a plastic than skin, but most of them were passable at least, while I didn’t see a single vagina that looked even close to right.
    • @lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The images on the site aren’t very good (typical low-detail airbrushed-look) nor are they generated very fast. See the examples here (mostly SFW) on what you can actually do, it takes about 15sec per image on a mid range gaming PC.

      That said, one big limit of current AI models remains: It’s always images of a single subject, it can’t do multiple subjects or complex interaction. Also facial expressions still always look quite bland. It can be worked around with inpainting and stuff, but plain text prompts have a hard time generating interesting images.