• Kichae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    Not explicitly, maybe, but implicitly, absolutely, and in multiple ways:

    • Supporting the system that creates one over the other
    • Having ‘bootstrap’ attitudes about the poor
    • Worrying about property value over utilization
    • Complaining about the homeless rather than the lack of action on housing
    • Voting against people who run on public housing

    In so, so many ways, people say they prefer the latter over the former. Usually just with the caveat that the homeless people also be invisible.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think a simple law that if there is a building, it must be in a repaired state.

        In St. Louis a person opened large portions of the city where they’ve let the holes decay.

        He should have to keep them in a proper upkeep or tear them down.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eedeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            I agree. I wish I could find an article on this guy but he is just hoarding and letting it rot. Has something to do with taxes.