• FireWire400OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Is there even a stable version for Linux? Last time I’ve checked it was still in beta

              • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                Closest thing I can think of would be back in the day when colour palettes were small enough that paint had colour blends in its palette, if you filled with one of those, it didn’t treat that filled area as one colour so that you could fill it again with a different colour.

                But I wouldn’t even call that a bug so much as a lack of feature. And it was kinda satisfying to fill one of those blended colours and then alternatively fill with the two colours that made the blend and watch it slowly creep out to fill the entire space. Lol I didn’t even realize I still had that memory in the archives.

    • @loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Just installed Edge on Arch after a disastrous Teams call with Firefox and Chromium, figured it was worth trying MS’ browser next time but I’m not holding my breath.

    • funkajunk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I use it for work - it allows me to keep things separate.

      EDIT

      For those telling me to change what I am doing, thanks, but no thanks. I use this solution because it works best for me.

    • @aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Used it for a while. One very nice feature is that when you use multiple profiles, you can specify in which of those external links open in. Every other browser opens them in the window that last had focus so I regularly have work related links open up in the private profile.

      Also the performance was quite nice.

      But since they continuously rub new services in my face with new versions, I ditched it again.

      • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It’s like they want to drive away the experienced users who don’t need their hands held and rarely need support to focus on the part of the market that will still find ways to break things no matter how much they dumb it down.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You can do that in Chrome too, if you have multiple chrome profiles right clicking on links give you the option to open it in a different profiles window

        • @aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yes, but with “external” I meant opening links from other apps like Slack.

          • MrScottyTay
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah that’s what I mainly used it for. I would right click links on slack and make sure it would open on my work profile or not depending on the context of the link.

            Although this could potentially have been when I used the web app rather than the installed app, so i may be misremembering

            • @aksdb@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              In the WebApp this would work. Across apps it’s a different story, since they just invoke a system command to open the URL in the associated application. From there it’s in the hands of that application, how to deal with it.

      • @kewjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        One very nice feature is that when you use multiple profiles, you can specify in which of those external links open in.

        is this similar to Firefox containers? dunno why mozzila makes it as a plugin and hasn’t bundled it in yet as a standard feature, literally can’t live without it.

        • @aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Not quite. Let’s say I have two profiles: “work” and “private”. If I have both open at the same time, they are separate browser windows with different tabs, different settings and different extentions.

          I can now specify that external links open in “work”. If I now click on a link in Slack or in Thunderbird, they open up in the window with the “work” profile, even if the “private” window was the last active one.

    • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Only thing I can think of is if you are developing a website or extension and need to make sure there isn’t some subtle browser difference. Though since it uses the same engine as Chrome, that use case should be a lot more niche than it used to be.

      • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Heh reminds me when I was doing web development back in the day and had IE running on Linux. It actually made more sense to test compatibility with IE by running it through wine on Linux than actually doing it on Windows because I could have multiple versions of IE installed at the same time.

    • FireWire400OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mainly use Firefox but have Edge to test website with, can’t really uninstall it anyway.

        • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Damnit! Now I’ve oiled my pitchforks for nothing. Ah well… gues i’ll be visiting the political subs again…

          • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Hey, I saw someone ask an innocent question about something they don’t know in a post down the street. Wanna go make fun that guy?

      • @Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Why not just use Ungoogled Chromium for your tests? It’s the same browser anyway, just without the spyware.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Well, I managed to uninstall it fully through Safe Mode and regedit but that made the fingerprint reader stop working. (It’s my sister’s laprop, okay? I use Mint on mine.)

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        not with that attitude you can’t. (C’mon. You know you wanna convert to linux.)

    • @TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      It got way better in the past few years. I think everybody hates it, because the internet explorer was that slow. So it just stayed in our minds that the Microsoft browser sucked.

    • nicman24
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      One browser to actually use and one without anything to test shit on

    • @tidaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      The experience in the enterprise as well as the management of it make sense for any company who are a m365 shop. Native seamless single sign on with corporate identities, along with syncing the browser make it a no brained for me to use for work. For personal stuff though I stick with Firefox.

    • Whisp
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      You get free credits for Dall-e for using edge (or maybe you just need to be signed into a msoft account 🤔)

      Also the bing AI chat is pretty good.

      Not my daily browser, but those are two reasons.

  • @br3d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    As it’s Microsoft, you can be pretty sure the option to turn off the new look and feel will be removed in 6 months

  • @SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    If you’re lucky, it’ll follow along with Chrome and start sharing your browser history to advertisers, too!

  • @BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    I sort of understand rounding outside edges for aesthetics since there’s nothing lost and it might be easier as a target for resizing, but inside corners are just stupid. You’re arbitrarily cutting corners out of content for no good reason.

    • FireWire400OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Remember: less viewport and more whitespace = somehow more ergonomic

      • papalonian
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        I mean you can like or dislike it of course but are you really complaining about a viewport 20 square pixels smaller than normal

        • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yes, that’s what redditor/lemmy users do. None of these people know anything about UX design or the tens of millions of dollars companies pour into user research.

          Any minimally decent website already has margin along the viewport edge, at worst you’re shaving off a few pixels from an image that the user probably hasn’t finished scrolling to anyway. There’s no real loss in content with this change.

          • Tanza
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            apart from that it ruins any website’s unique design by forcefully shoving it’s rounded corners into it, or making anything in the corner look odd

            • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              How does it ruin unique designs? Nothing important should be so far in the corner that it gets cut off

              • Tanza
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                i’ve designed a few websites recently which really favour sharp corners, and when one of my sharp objects randomly has a rounded corner, when none of the others do, just because it happens to be in the top left corner, in my opinion that’s a bad thing?

                • papalonian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Are you able to show us an example of what you’re talking about? I genuinely cannot picture a situation where this would be remotely as bad as some of y’all are making it out to be, how do you design a website in such a way that very slightly chamfered edges completely ruins the look?

          • papalonian
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            That was my takeaway.

            THeSe mOroNs dOnT knOw What ThEYre dOIng! WHo thOUgHT thIs wAs a GooD IDeA?!

            Probably the hundreds of focus groups that were behind the decision shrug

      • yukichigai
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Gosh I love scrolling through 7 pages just to read two paragraphs!

  • I_Miss_Daniel
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    Guess they’re going for the CRT look? Next up, all pages default to 4:3?

    • Pyro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      “This website looks best on Microsoft Edge at a resolution of 800x600”

    • @Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      When you close a tab everything shrinks to a tiny square and then blinks out of existence.

      If you hold a magnet too close to edge it goes all weird.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    I’ve noticed that there’s a shift in UI design currently back to the 2000s style of round UI design, which eventually moved out of the way for nice straight crisp corners when we shifted from CRTs to LCDs which could render pixel perfect images at last.

    We never limited the viewport on a browser of course, that’s madness. But just look at XP’s bubbly design and interfaces of the time vs Win8/10’s very angular, clean crisp interface.

    I do hope we’re not descending back into an age of curves, I’m not a fan. But styles come and go every few decades, and maybe younger people today are ready to experience their “age of curves” for the first time?

    • FireWire400OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It might just be down to nostalgia, especially when it comes to the early 2000s Windows XP style aesthetic. Just think about all the Vaporwave stuff (although that seems to be mostly late-90s-ish).

      I’m more of a Windows Aero fan, myself. Frutiger Aero in general has a very dystopian vibe for me but I’m a sucker for transparency.