• @sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I know it’s a crutch, but there’s always a USB-C to 3.5mm converter. There are some versions sold that still keep the charging port.

      • themeatbridge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        No, because I own earphones and cables and don’t want to create more waste if I can help it. Plus, I may want to connect the audio out to an existing stereo system, and plug it in to charge at the same time.

        • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I appreciate that more cables equals more waste and inconvenience. But your situation is more than likely not an issue for the majority. The options are out there. The arguments from some in here that a usbc to Aux is easy to lose is subjective. I’ve never lost mine, and it’s been just fine whenever I’ve needed it.

          If you want something to connect your phone to a stereo whilst retaining the ability to charge then there are adapters that have an auc outpit and usbc input that can work as well as systems, like one called wiim, that you connect to your wifi and aux into your stereo/speakers that can play music from most wifi enabled devices losslessly. Both of these options would be fairly futureproof as they would work with any new phone, stereo/speakers, or other device, regardless of which you upgrade.

          I know that it’s another thing to add on and costs kore money, but frankly, being angry about the lack of aux outputs on phones isn’t going to change anything.

          You can either complain and achieve nothing or adapt and make any phone you choose to buy work for you and your specific needs.

          If the audio output on this phone is the only concern you have, then i think it’s a small price to pay to support the many aspects of this phone that prevent explotation of workers and sustainability of materials etc.

          • themeatbridge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            That’s only one concern I have for this phone. The biggest concern is value to cost ratio. I’m willing to pay a premium for replaceable parts and longer support, but not if the design is substandard and the components are not there.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -352 years ago

      There are headphones that use the USB port. Headphone jacks are kinda dead tech at this point.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -172 years ago

          You can still buy DVD players, which means people still buy DVD players, but that doesn’t make it not dead tech

      • @dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Audio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.

          • @dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Oh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.

  • @sudo22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    Man I’m super interested in this hardware, if GrapheneOS supported FP it would be a no brainer for me.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    So the specs seem pretty good. Some are equivalent to the Pixel 7, some a little less, some a bit better like the selfie camera. But the pixel is quite a bit cheaper, nearly $200 retail. I wonder if they’re considering making a cheaper version equivalent to the Pixel a series.

    • Atemu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Sustainability has a price. You’re indirectly paying that price for the Pixel too btw, it’s just not on the bill.

    • Hydroel
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I wonder if they’re considering making a cheaper version equivalent to the Pixel a series

      I doubt it. Every different iteration of the phone means producing less pieces, which will inevitably drive the cost up. I doubt Fairphone can afford it.

  • HerraThykki
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    Will be interesting to see a comparison of the fp4 and the pf5!

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Specs aren’t too bad, doesn’t sound like a bad mig range phone and I might actually consider this if it wasn’t that they don’t sell it here 😔

  • @Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Seems really awesome and promising however I’m not really trying to have an outdated computer (read: phone) at 600 euro. Not even available in north America right now.

    I like what they’re trying to do, however 10 years is an eternity in the tech world and if this company doesn’t sell enough phones - likely enough of this phone, then whose to say this company will even be around in 10 years, much less have a dev team competent enough to take over support where Qualcomm left off?

    This is one of those huge promises that manufacturers make, with little to no evidence of being able to back it up.

    • @telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Lol, they were funded 10 years ago snd when fairephone one came out people were already saying what you’re saying.

      There are customers for this kind of phones and the idea to not throw away perfectly working electronics.

      But customers accepted to not be able to replace their batteries or being sold phone full of glue.

    • @Bread@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Outdated hardware isn’t really as important on a phone than it is as a PC. Unless you are gaming on your phone, phone hardware is plenty powerful enough these days for the grand majority of tasks.

      The software updates are the biggest concern and they intend to do 10 years of updates. That is more than long enough for this device before it becomes obsolete.

  • @synicalx1@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -42 years ago

    Sounda great, but like all previous Fairphones there’s no reason for the vast majority of the people on Earth to be interested in this because it’s only available in Europe.

    Even if I do import it here in AU; I don’t get a real warranty, I pay huge important taxes (or a markup to a reseller), and I have to go through just as much trouble for any replacement parts I may need.