• @sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I know it’s a crutch, but there’s always a USB-C to 3.5mm converter. There are some versions sold that still keep the charging port.

      • themeatbridge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        No, because I own earphones and cables and don’t want to create more waste if I can help it. Plus, I may want to connect the audio out to an existing stereo system, and plug it in to charge at the same time.

        • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I appreciate that more cables equals more waste and inconvenience. But your situation is more than likely not an issue for the majority. The options are out there. The arguments from some in here that a usbc to Aux is easy to lose is subjective. I’ve never lost mine, and it’s been just fine whenever I’ve needed it.

          If you want something to connect your phone to a stereo whilst retaining the ability to charge then there are adapters that have an auc outpit and usbc input that can work as well as systems, like one called wiim, that you connect to your wifi and aux into your stereo/speakers that can play music from most wifi enabled devices losslessly. Both of these options would be fairly futureproof as they would work with any new phone, stereo/speakers, or other device, regardless of which you upgrade.

          I know that it’s another thing to add on and costs kore money, but frankly, being angry about the lack of aux outputs on phones isn’t going to change anything.

          You can either complain and achieve nothing or adapt and make any phone you choose to buy work for you and your specific needs.

          If the audio output on this phone is the only concern you have, then i think it’s a small price to pay to support the many aspects of this phone that prevent explotation of workers and sustainability of materials etc.

          • themeatbridge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            That’s only one concern I have for this phone. The biggest concern is value to cost ratio. I’m willing to pay a premium for replaceable parts and longer support, but not if the design is substandard and the components are not there.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -352 years ago

      There are headphones that use the USB port. Headphone jacks are kinda dead tech at this point.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -172 years ago

          You can still buy DVD players, which means people still buy DVD players, but that doesn’t make it not dead tech

      • @dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Audio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.

          • @dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Oh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.

            • @SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 years ago

              If bicycles and motorcycles competed for the exact same role, with an opportunity cost allowing only one, how would bicycles not be obsolete?

                  • @potustheplant@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 years ago

                    You did, because you’re assuming that you can only choose one or the other. Even though it’s been demonstrated that the headphone jack does not require much space, can even be added to phones that don’t have it (check out Strange Parts on yt) and does not have any drawbacks.

                    That opportunity cost is not a thing.