Penn and Teller said they love being cheerleaders of science and I’ve always liked that take when discussing the difference between science and science communication.
Actual peer reviewed articles are usually 3 paragraphs of new content then 95 percent boring math and graphs to try and prove that. The popular articles written on them are more interesting and useful.
I like it when other people do science and then tell me about the exciting parts.
Penn and Teller said they love being cheerleaders of science and I’ve always liked that take when discussing the difference between science and science communication.
Actual peer reviewed articles are usually 3 paragraphs of new content then 95 percent boring math and graphs to try and prove that. The popular articles written on them are more interesting and useful.