• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Bro that’s fucked up. That is… not right. This type of heavy vehicle would require a special license in my country.

    • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you’re interested about this, here is a video from Climate Town about this topic. He mentions it less than two minutes in: SUV’s are regulated as “non passanger work vehicles” and don’t have to hit the same standards as regular cars and manufacturers can make much more money selling them.

      Of course this is absolutly insane. How does it make sense that 40+% of all vehicles on the road in the US are “non passanger work vehicles”.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean cause and effect is the other way around. Non-passenger work vehicles were mostly work vehicles until they started being regulated differently. Those regulations were clearly a problem long before they created the current situation

        Massachusetts was one of the holdouts: not that they could regulate the vehicles but I still remember when they required a commercial license