• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Management spent two years demanding everyone use AI, then discovered everyone was using AI. Now they’re shocked the office is a conveyor belt of hallucinated PowerPoints reviewed by other bots. The real productivity breakthrough will be executives learning that buying subscriptions isn’t a business strategy.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I just wish my company would start hiring again. I have been using the AI out of necessity, because we are short-staffed in certain areas. I’ve asked several times, directly, how much my AI use is costing and nobody is in a position to know. It’s certainly helped in some areas but I want to build a case that hiring a college grad or two can help more…

      • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Being short staffed is the whole point. They believe (where they are right or wrong) AI will replace large number employees. For example in my company where that are pushing vibe coding, my boss said that now they believe that the large projects need less people.

        If you use AI and still have to work overtime you are your own problem. As long as you deliver why would they change anything? Don’t deliver. It is not worth sacrificing your health for someone’s else’s profits. You have only one life.

        I see people who embraced vibe coding still working overtime and over weekends, more than before.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Careful they might just hire two AI using interns to replace you. Maybe bad mouth how much the AI is making mistakes and get them to make you stop using it and then ask for help when production slows.