The intitial investigation is in.

In a “bizarre and unprecedented” cyber-attack, hackers had remotely overridden the temperature settings on thousands of freezers, fridges and chiller cabinets pushing them from as low as -27C (-16.6F) to well over 50C (122F).

If shop managers first assumed it was an isolated failure, it soon became clear up to 700 stores – including those from the Intermarché, Coopérative U, Carrefour, Leclerc and Monoprix chains along with a number of smaller independent shops – had been victims of a cyber-attack.

The hackers had pirated the controllers supplied by the Danish company Danfoss that controls the freezers and fridges. Most supermarket cold aisles are connected to the internet to allow remote maintenance and alerts for system failures. Initial investigations suggest the hackers disabled alarm systems before tampering with the thermostats, or extended the defrost programme by several hours to avoid triggering alarms.

Danfoss said it had identified security flaws last year and had “long recommended” that customers install updates or replace obsolete unsupported systems. The affected refrigeration units were “running outdated firmware”, it said. In the days following the first wave of attacks, France’s cyber-attack alert centre ANSSI confirmed supermarkets using controllers from two other companies were also targeted.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hacked? This term applied to this is an insult. The user name was “admin”, and the password changed daily - it was the current date.

    This is not hacking, this is a complete and utter failure on behalf of the company who set this up, and their fault entirely.

      • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        // TODO: Change this to a time based crypto key deriving algo before release

        char *passwd = curr_date

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Do you have a source on this? The other article I had seen on this said the password changed daily and was algorithmically based on the date. So if someone analyzed past passwords they could derive future passwords, but not that it was literally the date.

      • thallamabond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/117429502412235079

        https://ironhackers.es/en/danfoss-ak-sm-800a-cve-2025-41450/

        The “code of the day”

        Many industrial devices include a service access so the vendor’s technician can get in without the customer’s password. A classic —and dangerous— way to implement it is the code of the day: a code that changes every day according to a formula that, in theory, only the vendor knows.

        The problem shows up when that “secret formula” is the only thing protecting access (security by obscurity) and it can also be recovered from the firmware itself. That is exactly what happens here: sm_app ships unobfuscated, with function and variable names in plain sight. The one that validates the code is called, literally, check_code_of_day.