• lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 days ago

    HUMANS are accountable for 100% of this.

    Start slapping cuffs and it stops. They want regulation - regulate them into 6’ cells

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is 100% the case. If an engineering firm fucks up and a bridge of building collapses or a CPU lacks working floating point arithmetic, they’re going to pay out the nose for it.

      They’re running around pretending they can’t control any of this, but without giving a language model access to a shell or something, what the fuck can it do?

      We have to deliberately grant these abilities. Otherwise, they don’t exist.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    OpenAI staff have been attacking public databases with various internal tools. Charges have yet been laid.

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Seems a little too convenient that a company, which desperately relies on data to train its models, has an oopsy involving its agents hacking numerous databases and stealing data.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Do the computer intrusion and hacking laws require intent? If not, these should be open and shut cases of criminal acts stemming from negligence.

    “But nobody was harmed and nobody profited!”

    Degrading access to databases harms the authorized users. The AI firms are profiting from this daya theft.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Smoke em while you got em. They gotta secure their competitive edge before legislation catches up.