• rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My favorite part of the Bible is Matthew 21:33-45; basically killing landlords is cool and the people who do the work deserve the reward

    33 “Listen to another parable: There was a landowner who planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a winepress in it and built a watchtower. Then he rented the vineyard to some farmers and moved to another place. 34 When the harvest time approached, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his fruit.

    35 “The tenants seized his servants; they beat one, killed another, and stoned a third. 36 Then he sent other servants to them, more than the first time, and the tenants treated them the same way. 37 Last of all, he sent his son to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said.

    38 “But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance.’ 39 So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.

    40 “Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?”

    41 “He will bring those wretches to a wretched end,” they replied, “and he will rent the vineyard to other tenants, who will give him his share of the crop at harvest time.”

    42 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:

    "‘The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes’[h]?

    43 “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit. 44 Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed.”

    45 When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard Jesus’ parables, they knew he was talking about them. 46 They looked for a way to arrest him, but they were afraid of the crowd because the people held that he was a prophet.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      Yeah, but also Jesus, also in Matthew, just 4 chapters later:

      For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master’s money. Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’”

      Jesus was kind of a dick.

  • human@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I saw a movie several years ago (name below to avoid spoilers) that was “based on a true story” and involved two people stranded in a dangerous situation with no way to communicate with anyone. I watched this whole movie, invested in the characters and the story, and then at the end they died, bodies never recovered. I was so annoyed. I get that biopics take a lot of liberties, but how tf could they say anything but the first ten minutes were in any way “based on a true story”?

    Tap for spoiler

    I think it was Open Water

  • BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    My favourite thing about the Bible is that every time it’s been translated the people doing the translations include they’re own nonsense.

  • Acid_Burn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I still think it’s wild that no one really talks about how the order of the books after the gospels is shortest to longest with Revalation (some truly crazy ass shit) tacked on at the end.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Official explanation: The Holy Spirit narrated to the author. This can be quite removed, some books were written many years after the event, some were passed down.

    A few centuries later, the Council of Nicea went through all of these texts and decided, “This is real, we can tell, we’re putting this in the Bible. That… that other stuff is fake, yuck! Gross. Heresy.”

    They also resolved a pressing issue for the new church. “Priests, please stop cutting your balls off, that is a metaphor, not literal instruction. Even though He said that they were literal instructions, that was also a metaphor.”

    “Oh, just one more thing… you can’t get married. No, He didn’t say that, but we’re inspired by the Magic Bird, so mote it be.”

    You probably think I’m joking… but sadly, no.

    p.s. the church pays no taxes womp womp

    • America@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My favorite bit of Christian lore is the time that predestination became a widespread belief. People cursed god and the church and sinned 30x harder, recognizing that if they did it, they were always meant to. In the absence of choice, people found hedonism not just agreeable but compulsory. Then the church solved that issue by telling people that they could actually get into heaven by paying. People got so pissed off that a sect splintered off, and I think that how we got Protestants.

      Someone please tell me how many different events I erroneously mixed together.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Official explanation: The Holy Spirit narrated to the author.

      You mean the four authors who all wrote the same story but slightly different?

      Holy spirit talking to people must have been common back then. Strange how it just stopped.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          So, everyone had, until 3000 years ago, schizophrenia induced by gods and were comanded by gods? That’s some wild mental gymnastic he did…

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      “Oh, just one more thing… you can’t get married. No, He didn’t say that, but we’re inspired by the Magic Bird, so mote it be.”

      Didn’t that one come later because certain members of the clergy were having kids and functionally turning their positions into hereditary fiefdoms?

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        IiRC it was more so that the Church got actual fiefdoms and wanted control so that potential priestly families wouldn’t just distance themselves into secular noble houses, taking lands with them.

        Fiefdoms and related duties originated from kings, so the church wanted similar parallel rights over their vassal priests.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My favorite part is how well it can be used to light a fireplace. Just tear out some pages, put some wood over it and light it. Secundair use is rolling paper when you’ve run out.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The part where Moses writes down his own death and funeral is also pretty trippy.

    I also like how John keeps saying “BTW Jesus totally liked me more than the other disciples. Beloved, even.”

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    new testament is obviously bullshit

    the old testament has some really great stories but it’s unfortunate the Jews rewrote all the stories to fit their narrative

    still not a bad book

    7/10

    • SourDragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The first few books of the old testament are just bad fanfiction based off the Epic of Gilgamesh

      The book of Job is about Adonaiyahwehjehovahbob bragging about torturing an innocent man.

      And I’m sure a lot of the other old testament books (both protestant and catholic) are just as problematic.