@bekkaboo@girlcock.club Linux itself is heavily using AI models. Therefore, every Linux distribution moving to recent kernel versions is heavily built on top of using AI models. Creating a Linux distribution not heavily using it would require a hard fork of the Linux kernel and many other projects.
It's unclear what would be accomplished by banning AI for a tiny portion of the code while continuing to use Linux, AOSP, Chromium and hundreds of other projects heavily using it. We'd still be benefiting from it.
GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.
We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.
You slop garglers really are wonderful people.
Also, didn’t Debian declare that AI generated code is not compliant with their policies?Also also: organic foods, human-powered bicycles, acoustic music, manual transmissions, etc
who’s “we”? I don’t happen to write any OSes myself, but yeah, tribalism is a powerful thing.
it doesn’t matter what debian declared, the kernel is what matters. but also no, they didn’t https://www.theverge.com/tech/986789/linux-debian-generative-ai-policy
An AI supporter would link The Verge instead of the source itself. 😒
You’re right, they allowed AI generated code.
https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte
I was posting from mobile, so I linked the page that’s readable on mobile, unlike the source ;)
But yeah, no, sure, keep seething
I read the source on mobile.
Maybe you’re too used to having ChatGPT summarize things