• PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They gonna ban the usage in cinemas, then super markets, then the gyms, then they gonna ban guys to buy them, ban dogs to buy them, ban…

      They gonna “ban” everything else but the glasses selling itself… Can’t touch big corpos you know…

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        See, the whole joke was that Mark was the sex offender. It was a bit of a sideways jab and can be missed.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A completely unenforceable idea driven by moral panic. We’re already seeing plenty of cheap ones on temu, and other more covert types of cameras have been available for years. (Look up pen cameras on Amazon, you’ll look at anyone with a pen in their shirt pocket very differently for the rest of your life)

    Not to mention there’s already open source 3d printed smart glasses. Which means this would no doubt lead to calls for ID checks to buy a 3d printer.

  • laserm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I would agree only if the responsibility to not carry smart glasses is on the offender only, so vendors wouldn’t have to check their ID, but the perp could be arrested and charged for having them.