Researchers found low concentrations of so-called forever chemicals in various “eco-friendly” straws, raising doubts about whether they’re an appropriate alternative.

  • @StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1392 years ago

    Disposable products are gonna have problems to keep them cheap. The solution to straws is non-dispossble straws, always was.

    Also this is still a silly topic, straws won’t save the planet.

    • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      662 years ago

      Or stop using straws all together. Cups/lids can be made differently, so they are more like a sippy cup. You don’t NEED straws. Humans are totally capable of drinking directly from a cup, even without a special lid.

      • @Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        My mother is up there in age, every time she drinks from a cup she ends up spilling it on herself. Im not saying she NEEDS straws, but it sure makes it easier on her.

        • @Mythril@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I wouldn’t say that nobody ever should use straws, but there are definitely a lot of people who use straws even when it’s not necessary, like when they’re just sitting in a restaurant eating.

          I can agree that having a straw is easier for takeaway eaten on the go or in the car too, for example.

      • @Chiyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Costco food court lids come to mind. They have a hole near the side where you can either use a straw or drink directly.

        • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I’ve never seen those in person, but after an image search, yeah, exactly. I only used starbucks as an example because they are everywhere, and most people have seen them before.

      • @phobiac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Straws are an accessibility need for some humans, not everyone is actually physically capable of drinking directly from a cup.

        • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          That’s fine, they can have their own non disposables for their own needs. We do NOT need to keep polluting the planet (yeah I know there are plenty of other ways we do it) with EVERYTHING being disposable.

          • DessertStorms
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Single use bendy straws were literally invented to help keep bedbound and other disabled people alive. There are also many reasons people can’t use different alternatives.

            You personally not using something, doesn’t mean others don’t, and to deny access to a literal lifeline for the sake of 0.003% of the plastics in the ocean (literally a drop in an ocean) because it makes you feel better and requires zero effort or sacrifice (from you), instead of actually acting to resolve the problem (like being anti-capitalist rather than just trying to apply band aids to its symptoms) is not only gross and ableist, but also a colossal counterproductive waste of time.

          • @phobiac@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 years ago

            I’m not in disagreement regarding moving away from disposable goods, especially plastic based ones. Just trying to point out the problem isn’t as cut and dry as you suggested. Straws are popular partly because they are more accessible so any solution that involves getting rid of them should take that need into account.

            • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              No, straw are popular because that’s what we have always been given, and people want convenience. Yeah, a small subset of people may need that assistance, but let’s not pretend that most people are being altruistic.

        • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          So, your suggestion is to continue to kill the planet, because we might inconvenience a small subset of the population? I get it, I really do, it’s not fair for them, but those people can carry reusables if they need a straw.

          • DessertStorms
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            So your suggestion is to let disabled people die because you can’t be bothered to fight the actual problem and just want a feel-good campaign to take part in and to feel superior to others with?
            At least be honest…

            • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              No, as I have said in MULTIPLE other comments. Straws exist in other flavors than plastic or disposable. Non disposables also come in a variety of shapes. People can use those. Where did I say they shouldn’t have something they need.

              Like I also said in another comment, people who “need” straws now all just died of dehydration before plastic/disposable straws existed?

        • @AttackBunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          As I said, I hate using Starbucks as an example, but they have drinks that are roughly the same consistency, and they are fine to drink out of their newer lids sans straws.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Yes, but some people actually depend on them to live, and considering jut how little of the plastics they made up, the crusade to get rid of them is nothing but a superficial feel good endeavour that has absolutely zero impact on the crisis we face, and just leaves disabled people lacking access to a literal life line.

        • @bentropy@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It can’t have zero impact if you replace 50-300 million straws per day in de US alone. Could we do more? Of course we could but a start is a start and this is better than nothing.

          Besides that I don’t get how and why someone’s life might depends on plastic straws but I’m sure we could find an alternative for that poor person.

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      We really need to change the way that consumers consume things. People need to stop acting entitled to everything they want immediately and with every convenience available.

      Maybe people should start travelling around with their own straws. Have a craving for an iced coffee?? Well either bring your own metal/silicone reusable straw or deal with drinking straight from the cup. Be responsible and stop expecting corporations and government to solve every issue and maintain the lifestyle we have had the past few decades.

      Things need to change in order for the world to get better, and maintaining the same level of convenience and consumption is unfortunately not something that we can afford.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        -12 years ago

        Single use bendy straws were literally invented to help keep bedbound and other disabled people alive. There are also many reasons people can’t use different alternatives.

        You personally not using something, doesn’t mean others don’t, and to deny access to a literal lifeline for the sake of 0.003% of the plastics in the ocean (literally a drop in an ocean) because it makes you feel better and requires zero effort or sacrifice (from you), instead of actually acting to resolve the problem (like being anti-capitalist rather than just trying to apply band aids to its symptoms) is not only gross and ableist, but also a colossal counterproductive waste of time.

  • @ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    No comment on the level of PFAS aside from

    though the levels were low

    This is just feeding the outrage machine to get clicks. If it was a story they’d be citing concentration guidelines and telling you what concentrations were found in the products. It’s not a story, it’s rage bait.

    • volvoxvsmarla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I agree 99%. The 1% left is that, honestly, it is shitty that they contain any kind of PFAS to begin with. If PFAS in any kind of concentration are part of the production process, then it just isn’t sustainable in the long run.

      But the question is why do we need straws at all. I doubt that back in 1970 anyone would drink a latte macchiato with a straw. I found it strange just 15 years ago. If you fancy straws, you can get one high quality reusable one (steel, bamboo whatever) and carry it with you - I find this proposition much less offensive then expecting me to always carry a huge reusable cup with me. And for the most part you can consume drinks without a straw.

      Now, there is people who have disabilities that require them to use a straw. For them, have some in store as a vendor, and hand them out if requested.

    • @silentknyght@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Agreed. If it was “intentionally added” PFAS, it would say that, and that might be a big deal. I read through the article and didn’t see that. Just speculation that it might be. PFAS is everywhere.

  • @bentropy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    Once in a restaurant I got some longe macaroni pasta as a straw and I still think this was genius.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If I’m not mistaken, manufacturing facilities spray PFAS agents on various conveyor parts to prevent pulp from sticking to them and therefore require stoppage and cleaning. In other words, PFAS reduce the time and money spent on cleaning manufacturing equipment. Congratulations shareholders!

    • @Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I’m glad someone is thinking of the shareholders. It’s about time we focus on them and not such pesky abstractions like “the environment” or “the future”

      /s

  • 🇨🅾️🇰🅰️N🇪
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We have a couple metal straws and washable plastic ones. The metal ones probably have lead and the plastic ones are made of baby kittens.

    • @I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Yeah, it sucks that straws somehow became the poster child for saving the world. It’s nowhere near our main problem, even with sea plastic (that would be discarded fishing nets) but if we can masochistically try to suck a milkshake through a collapsing, leaking, sticking to my lips, paper straw then I must be doing something good, right…?

      • @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This and plastic shopping bags are the perfect poster children - they inconvenience consumers and not shareholders. Look at your average shopping cart and tell me how much plastic is in it. Did we ever address that, or was it totally ignored for the tiny fraction of that plastic that constitutes disposable bags? Disposble bags that have now been replaced by other bags that are dubiously better that we have to buy, and whose normal reuse-case is now other thin plastic bags that we have to also buy.

        Meanwhile the enormous amount of packing plastic that is already in the shopping cart before you bag anything is left alone, because presumably doing anything about that would change supply lines, and that would cost money for shareholders. Can’t have that.

        Also if you’ve got a straw you almost certainly have a plastic lid that has more plastic in it than the straw did but there isn’t an easy way to fix that. It’s an incredibly thin and meaningless cover for the real problems.

      • @PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        Read the entire thing:

        Of the straws tested in the study, those made of paper were the most likely to contain PFAS: The chemicals were detected in 18 out of 20 brands. Four out of five bamboo straws sampled contained PFAS, compared to three out of four plastic straws and two out of five glass straws. All five stainless steel straws analyzed were PFAS-free.

  • _galactose
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    “All the straw manufacturers should take warning and say, ‘Hey, do we use this stuff?’ Because at the moment, they’re not even asking that question,”
    That is kind of concerning!

  • @Squander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    When the craze first started I remember seeing paper straws in plastic. Someone was close but didnt quite get it.

  • DessertStorms
    link
    fedilink
    -62 years ago

    I knew I should have avoided the comments… The fact that defence of this bullshit ban still endures (and in the literal face of its failures) frustrates me beyond words.

    • @Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The plastic straws also contain PFAS anyway so paper still may be marginally better, but it’s definitely money and time that could have been better spent on a different environmental initiative. I’m happy to see plastic bags go, though. Can’t win em all