For most people today, public elections are synonymous with democracy. However, between 508 and 322 BCE, Athenians favoured a lottery system known as ‘sortition’. They largely believed it to be more fair, representative and responsive to the public interest than elections, which are often influenced by money and can foster destructive political polarisation. In this animation, Michael Vazquez, associate director of the Parr Center for Ethics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, breaks down both the potential of lottery-based systems and their limits. In particular, he highlights an updated lottery system conceived by the US philosopher Alex Guerrero, designed to address flaws in earlier models and some of the most pressing problems in contemporary electoral politics.
In theory, rule by lottery might sound good…but have you met the average person living next door to you? Just imagine what President Cletus of Buttfuck, Appalachia would do with a ten year term in office.
Appalachia has been politically stepped on by everyone for generations. That’s a big part of why they’re poor. Cletus may not be an expert on how to run a country but I bet he would help out some Appalachians. Your blatant classism is pretty gross.
as opposed to Trump?
I actually can imagine it. Its not that big a stretch.