• floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    traders on prediction markets don’t think so, at least not for some time.

    There’s just a four percent chance on Polymarket that Trump will acquire Greenland before 2027.

    On Kalshi, there’s just a 6.8 percent chance the US will acquire any new territory before 2027, though the odds are slightly better on a longer timeline. There’s a 22 percent chance the US will acquire a new territory before Trump’s term ends on January 20, 2029.

    🤮 Why the actual fuck are journalists reporting on what “prediction markets” “think”? Between this and “which Europeans see as a violation of Greenland’s sovereignty” this article seems to casually legitimize trump’s claim

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think they have (unfortunately correctly) realized that the prediction markets can be bastardized into a quick and dirty public opinion poll without needing to do any of that dirty icky work like sending out questionaires or controlling statistical poll biases

      • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Some also have advertising deals with those prediction markets, so them saying things about it is really just a quick ad break in some cases 🫠

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Indeed, I am tired of “public” opinion (which is more wall-street-type-dudes’ opinion) being even considered on matters like this. I don’t care if 100% of Americans support it or have resigned to it happening, the only opinion that matters is Greenland’s, as unless they democratically decide to join the US (no chance of that happening anytime soon), anything else is an invasion plain and simple, no matter if polymarket says that will make line go up

    • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      The only reason to consider them (which is not what the media is doing) is because we’ve already confirmed Trump and likely countless other corrupt goons of his have been placing massive bets on events they know for a fact Trump is going to act on. Insider “gambling”.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Journalists reporting on prediction markets aren’t journalists. They’re opinion writers. They need to stir up possible intigues in order to get those clicks for cash.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because people with huge amounts of money also have inside information.

      If the markets showed more favorably, it would be a legitimate indicator that there are more discussions of this happening amongst top brass. That there are no people nakedly staking profiteering bets on this is legitimate information worth comparing against the presidents words.

      Like I understand polymarket and kalshi are gross things and they’re morally bankrupt, but surely you understand why a journalist would reference this very legitimate barometer of information…?

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m vaguely sure the whole point of inside information in these cases is betting against the market, which results in better payouts. Or at least, making big bets on 50/50 things just before they happen, instead of sitting in a pile of nobodies with 90% chance and zero profit.

  • MonsterMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trump is turning the US into the fourth member of the hoodlum group of countries along with Russia, North Korea and Israel.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The amount he says during his word salads of speeches is amazing. I don’t think I’ve heard anyone say so many words without a tiny bit of relevance to the previous sentance, or the previous comma if typing it out. Truly if you want someone to speak without saying anything meaningful, he’s your guy.

      Okay I’ll correct, I don’t think I’ve heard anyone not under some supervised care say so much irrelevant to what they were saying one sentence ago. Though I guess technically he is supervised but not in my intended meaning.

  • krigo666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Supreme Orange Turd is a delusional imbecile, he couldn’t even keep a porn star under control.