inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoGerman lawyers: Ban on far-right AfD 'likely successful'www.dw.comexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1235arrow-down11
arrow-up1234arrow-down1external-linkGerman lawyers: Ban on far-right AfD 'likely successful'www.dw.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squaremycodesucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70arrow-down2·3 months agoGood call about not banning it because it’s too popular. Just ignore it and wait for people to come to their senses on logic. It worked to stop Trump in the US. /s
minus-squarenao@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·3 months agoLast time the reason was they are too small to ban. Now they are too large?
minus-squarerwrwefwef@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·3 months agoBanning a small party would be politically damaging, banning a big party would be institutionally damaging.
minus-squaremycodesucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down2·3 months agoYou know what else is institutionally damaging? Right-wing populist rule.
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI guess the Nazis have arrived to downvote this fact.
Good call about not banning it because it’s too popular. Just ignore it and wait for people to come to their senses on logic.
It worked to stop Trump in the US.
/s
Last time the reason was they are too small to ban. Now they are too large?
Banning a small party would be politically damaging, banning a big party would be institutionally damaging.
You know what else is institutionally damaging?
Right-wing populist rule.
I guess the Nazis have arrived to downvote this fact.