• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depends. If there’s lots of traffic, yes. If it’s sparse enough that you can merge without slowing people down too much, just do it early.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that’s the big asterisk on the “zipper merging is more efficient” premise. It assumes that things are already bottlenecked. If you have the space to merge early without slowing down, you do that. People trying to force their way in at the last minute (when they didn’t have to) is one of the things that triggers the bottleneck in the first place.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        K but people don’t tend to complain about those driving down the empty lane if there is no bottle neck.

        Obviously if you’re racing down to cut someone off, that’s just as rude as any unsafe merge, but thats not unique to zipper merging, so is it relevant?

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ll merge early but also try to go a bit slower than the person in front of me to open a gap which allows me to absorb some of the traffic wave (where flow alternatively speeds up and slows down from people trying to get up to speed only to have to slam on the brakes because some car ahead wasn’t going fast enough to maintain that), as well as leave space for others to merge at speed.

        Though I sometimes close the gap if I notice people pulling into the right lane to try to skip the line.